Suchergebnisse

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Elena Martinez-Rosales was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU18/01107) . Alba Hernandez-Martinez was supported by the Plan Propio, Gerty Cori program from the University of Almeria, Spain. Irene Esteban-Cornejo was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (RTI2018-095284-J-100) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (RYC2019-027287-I) . Alberto Soriano-Maldonado was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (ref. RTI2018-093302-A-I00) . ; Objectives: We determined the representation of women in sport sciences research leadership by assessing the proportion of women in (i) leading authorship positions of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2000 to September 2020 in sport sciences journals and (ii) editorial boards of these journals as of September 2020. Design: Review. Methods: We searched PubMed for RCTs published from January 1, 2000, to September 1, 2020, in a representative sample of the top sport sciences journals and identified the sex of first and senior authors through photographs, sex pronouns, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, institutional, or other profiles. This strategy was also used to identify the sex of the editorial board members from the selected journals. Results: A total of 4841 articles published in 14 journals, and 1418 editors, were analyzed. The average proportions of female first and senior authorship were 24.8% and 16.8%, respectively. The percentage of female first authorship increased by ~0.5% annually (β=0.702; B=0.46, 95% CI=0.24 to 0.68, p < 0.001) from2000 to 2020, while the percentage of female senior authorship did not change over time (β = 0.274; B = 0.15, 95% CI = −0.102 to 0.398, p = 0.230). Among the editorial boards' positions, 19.7% were occupied by women. None of the editors-in-chief of the selected journals were women. Conclusions:Women are markedly underrepresented in leading authorship and editorial board positions in sport sciences, despite a ~0.5% annual increase in female first authorship in the past two decades. The mechanisms underlying these findings and the actions needed to reduce potential gender inequalities warrant further research. ; Spanish Government FPU18/01107 ; University of Almeria, Spain ; Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness RTI2018-095284-J-100 ; Spanish Government RYC2019-027287-I ; Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities RTI2018-093302-A-I00

The use of social science knowledge by policymakers has fallen short of what many social scientists would prefer. Research that supports this conclusion may be flawed by a methodological bias that overlooks the variety of knowledge sources used by decision makers. A survey of social workers that measures knowledge use from the perspective of the user, rather than the producer, of information identifies three types of knowledge sources, all of which are integrated in the decision-making process. We argue here for a shift in the direction of knowledge utilization research that will recognize similarities between knowledge use and knowledge creation.

Intro -- The Decisionist Imagination -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- List of Figures and Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction. Who Decides? -- Chapter 1. Reading the International Mind -- Chapter 2. Militant Democracy as Decisionist Liberalism -- Chapter 3. Parliamentary and Electoral Decisions as Political Acts -- Chapter 4. Decision and Decisionism -- Chapter 5. How Having Reasons Became Making a Decision -- Chapter 6. Computable Rationality, NUTS, and the Nuclear Leviathan -- Chapter 7. The Unlikely Revolutionaries -- Chapter 8. Prediction and Social Choice -- Chapter 9. Predictive Algorithms and Criminal Sentencing -- Conclusion. The Myth of the Decision -- Index

This article discusses and reflects on the action research process used during an investigation in which social and participatory media were integrated into the face-to-face classroom. The action research project concerned pedagogical and curricular changes created, negotiated, reflected upon and documented as new media were incorporated into 13 classes, over an 18-month period, in an Australian public high school. The action research process and its continual cycles of improvement were used to redesign projects that incorporated new media within a contemporary pedagogical approach to schooling young people. The article discusses the change in thinking and mindset for the teacher that came about from this new learning milieu and was undertaken with a view to meet the school demands of a one electronic device per student program. This study supports educators and learning designers in developing curriculum and pedagogy that is more in line with the demands and skills of young people using social and participatory media to engage, interpret and understand their social worlds.

This collection of essays by Sheila Jasanoff explores how democratic governments construct public reason, that is, the forms of evidence and argument used in making state decisions accountable to citizens. The term public reason as used here is not simply a matter of deploying principled arguments that respect the norms of democratic deliberation. Jasanoff investigates what states do in practice when they claim to be reasoning in the public interest. Reason, from this perspective, comprises the institutional practices, discourses, techniques and instruments through which governments claim legitimacy in an era of potentially unbounded risks-physical, political, and moral. Those legitimating efforts, in turn, depend on citizens' acceptance of the forms of reasoning that governments offer. Included here therefore is an inquiry into the conditions that lead citizens of democratic societies to accept policy justification as being reasonable. These modes of public knowing, or "civic epistemologies," are integral to the constitution of contemporary political cultures. Methodologically, the book is grounded in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS). It uses in-depth qualitative studies of legal and political practices to shed light on divergent cross-cultural constructions of public reason and the reasoning political subject. The collection as a whole contributes to democratic theory, legal studies, comparative politics, geography, and ethnographies of modernity, as well as STS.

Der Aufsatz geht der Frage nach, wie mit Hilfe von anonymen Tanz Wissen über Körper, Selbst und Andere produziert, in Frage gestellt und erfahrbar werden kann. Dazu wird mit dem Konzept des embodied research gearbeitet, bei dem nicht nur über den Tanz geforscht wird, sondern durch das Tanzen. Tanzen ist hier nicht nur Forschungsgegenstand. Tanzen ist Forschung. Hierzu wird auf drei unterschiedliche Movement Research Workshops Bezug genommen: Blind Contact Dance, Dark-Room Contact Improvisation und Embodied Rebellion (becoming uncivilized). In Hinsicht auf diese drei Workshops werden unterschiedliche Auslegungsweisen der Rolle von Anonymität im Tanz einander gegenübergestellt. Anonymität als Selbstfindung, Anonymität als Dekonstruktion und Anonymität als verkörperte Rebellion. Die Idee von Tanz als Rebellion wird abschließend eingehender diskutiert, denn die Rebellion, um die es hier geht, ist insofern von ethico-politischer Bedeutung, dass sie sich gegen Schamgrenzen richtet, welche als Resultat und Katalysator heteronormativer sowie (post)kolonialer Unterdrückungsregime verstanden werden.

Covers the period 1970-71 to 1984-85

This groundbreaking, open access volume analyses and compares data practices across several fields through the analysis of specific cases of data journeys. It brings together leading scholars in the philosophy, history and social studies of science to achieve two goals: tracking the travel of data across different spaces, times and domains of research practice; and documenting how such journeys affect the use of data as evidence and the knowledge being produced. The volume captures the opportunities, challenges and concerns involved in making data move from the sites in which they are originally produced to sites where they can be integrated with other data, analysed and re-used for a variety of purposes. The in-depth study of data journeys provides the necessary ground to examine disciplinary, geographical and historical differences and similarities in data management, processing and interpretation, thus identifying the key conditions of possibility for the widespread data sharing associated with Big and Open Data. The chapters are ordered in sections that broadly correspond to different stages of the journeys of data, from their generation to the legitimisation of their use for specific purposes. Additionally, the preface to the volume provides a variety of alternative "roadmaps" aimed to serve the different interests and entry points of readers; and the introduction provides a substantive overview of what data journeys can teach about the methods and epistemology of research.