Suchergebnisse

Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch are the co-founders of Fusion GPS, the private research firm behind the Steele "Trump-Russia" dossier. Simpson and Fritsch join David to discuss their joint roots as Wall Street Journal reporters, how the research skills they developed as journalists translated to careers in private investigative work, how they met Christopher Steele and the formulation of the Steele Dossier, and what they learned about Donald Trump following a private investigation of then-candidate Trump.

Their new book, Crime in Progress, takes readers inside the firm's four-year-long investigation into Donald Trump's Russia ties—culminating in what became known as the Steele dossier.
To learn more about how CNN protects listener privacy, visit cnn.com/privacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Certain extremely successful popular culture contents may convey democratic values that can have an impact on the political views of readers and fans. The differences in the values of Harry Potter fans and average Facebook users using social data about public Facebook activity are examined. Even though currently only a minority share the values that the Harry Potter stories embody, they are still an important segment of society that one might not even be aware of if one only follows the state-controlled media and make up a significant majority of the Hungarian media market. Understanding this culturally constructed fan network is thus academically and socially relevant.

PurposeThis paper aims to review the available academic literature on CSR from employees' perspective, with an objective to better understand the individual-level analysis of CSR and clarify the current state of thinking in the area. Specifically, the authors present the evolution of the concept of CSR, from the historical overview to the emergence of recent theory and conceptualizations; the underlying theoretical foundations of CSR; the studied variables for CSR; and the research gaps and future work avenues in the field of CSR.Design/methodology/approachIn all, 158 articles from 72 journals were included in the review, and a comprehensive analysis of the reviewed articles was performed.FindingsThis paper makes a significant contribution to the literature by presenting a comprehensive review of the articles published in academic journals, focusing on employees' perspective of CSR. The findings advance the understanding of the research trend in employee-focused micro-level CSR research. They will assist organizations better understand "why," "how" and "when" employees react to CSR initiatives of an organization. This paper also identifies the existing gaps in employee-centric CSR research, which will provide important directions for future research in the area.Research limitations/implicationsThe review focused exclusively on journal publications. Dissertations, conference papers, working papers and practitioner papers were excluded, as they are not peer-reviewed.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the comprehensive review papers that focus exclusively on employees' perspective of CSR, by analyzing 158 articles from the period 1961-2017.