Local Government Capacity in Post-Soviet Central Asia
In: Viešoji politika ir administravimas: mokslo darbai = Public policy and administration : research papers, Volume 14, Issue 3
ISSN: 2029-2872
1809102 results
Sort by:
In: Viešoji politika ir administravimas: mokslo darbai = Public policy and administration : research papers, Volume 14, Issue 3
ISSN: 2029-2872
In: Local government studies, Volume 25, Issue 4, p. 116-136
ISSN: 1743-9388
In: ICG Middle East report, 33
World Affairs Online
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Volume 1, Issue 2, p. 162-183
ISSN: 1468-0491
In: Public personnel management, Volume 12, Issue 2, p. 129-145
ISSN: 1945-7421
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 15, Issue 1, p. 26
ISSN: 1540-6210
In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 15, p. 26-34
ISSN: 0033-3352
This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses intergovernmental relations of local governments in India. The entry forms part of the LoGov Report on India. To access the full version of the report on India, other practices regarding intergovernmental relations of local governments and to receive more information about the project, please visit: https://www.logov-rise.eu/. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823961.
BASE
In: Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, Volume 30, Issue 2, p. 14
This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses intergovernmental relations of local governments in Switzerland. The entry forms part of the LoGov Report on Switzerland. To access the full version of the report on Switzerland, other practices regarding intergovernmental relations of local governments and to receive more information about the project, please visit: https://www.logov-rise.eu/. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 823961.
BASE
This paper examines the impacts of devolving authority for public resource allocation to local governments in a setting of limited electoral control. Such a setting differs from that assumed by seminal formal models of devolution, but describes many developing countries. This study presents a formal model of this setting and tests it using unique data from a natural experiment in rural Ethiopia whereby half of the country's regions were decentralized but not the other half. Employing a spatial regression discontinuity design, this article shows that decentralization strongly improved delivery of agricultural public services, which are of high priority to the central government. In contrast, it did not impact drinking water services, on which the central government places lower priority but citizens place high priority. ; IFPRI3; ISI; CRP2; 5 Strengthening Institutions and Governance; IFPRIOA ; DSGD; PIM ; PR ; CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM)
BASE
In: The China Quarterly, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: Local government studies, Volume 25, Issue 4, p. 116-136
ISSN: 0300-3930
In: Local government studies, Volume 30, Issue 4, p. 467-480
ISSN: 1743-9388