Suchergebnisse

We introduce Property-Driven Design, a tool-flow that guarantees formal soundness be- tween ESL and RTL and thus enables a shift-left of general functional verification by moving HW verification to higher abstraction layers. In addition, by generating a formal Verification IP (VIP) automatically from ESL descriptions, the entry hurdle to formal methods is reduced considerably, opening them to a wider audience, which effectively 'democratizes' them. Short feedback cycles reduce time spent on RTL verification and lead to higher-quality designs.

Since the drawn of the civilization, when the importance of land was appreciated, land ownership has been linked with certain rights and duties for the owners which have evolved over the centuries to the idea of ownership as it is understood today. The basic rights in land are the right to the use and enjoyment of land, the right to income from land and the right to alienate or transfer land. The aggregate of ownership rights over a piece of land, comprised what has been termed as the bundle of property rights.Property rights have a very significant role to play both at international and national level in the current socio-economic environment and have been a matter of dispute between nations as well as between affected owners and central or local governments. The aim of this paper is to outline the fundamental property protection rights at international and national level by reference to UN Conventions, European Conventions as well as comparative overview of different countries. Within the scope of this paper an attempt is made to outline the main property compensation rights regarding illegal occupiers or users of in the occupied area of Cyprus, since the Turkish invasion in 1974. Specifically, this paper is divided into three basic sections which are described below: Outline the major provisions of International and European Law as regards property protection rights. These include the right of ownership and the conditions under which a compulsory purchase and compensation could take effect. Some violations of the property rights are described in this section, which have been extracted from Court Case decisions in an attempt to present the extent to which rights in Property are safeguarded. Comparative country overview of major provisions in their Constitution and legislative provisions regarding property protection rights. Also, this section attempts to outline the basic rules of compensation assessment as well as practical examples of their application by reference to court case decisions, when these rights ...

This Article proposes that local governments should be able to decide for themselves how to protect private property, and then be held to that choice as if it were a local constitutional pre-commitment. Specifically, the Article proposes state enabling legislation to create a mechanism for local pre-commitments around the most contested takings and land use issues, like the meaning of public use, the extent of just compensation, the diminution of value that triggers compensation, and others. The resulting local variation in property regimes would allow consumers - homeowners, developers, and any other property owners - to select the property protection they want by choosing where to live and invest. It would also allow local governments to use variation in property protection as a basis for inter-local competition. Implicit in this proposal is a view of property protection as a tool for attracting investment. Given the opportunity, local governments should offer property protection when the costs of that protection - in the form of increased compensation and decreased flexibility - are less than the benefits from increased investment. This cost-benefit calculus will apply differently depending on the characteristics and priorities of particular local governments.

In an address before the 1949 annual meeting of the American Society of International Law this writer remarked that the laws governing captured enemy property have never been codified or collected in one place and are very difficult to find and apply. The lack of a handy tool in the field of captured property has been noted at times by others, including Professor H. A. Smith, formerly a colonel with the British 21st Army Group, who observed that the "law of booty is almost unwritten" and Judge Manley O. Hudson, who wrote some years ago in an editorial in this JOURNAL that the "literature on captured property and war booty seemed inadequate."