In: Allern , E H , Hansen , V W , Rødland , L , Røed , M , Gall , C L , Klüver , H , Marshall , D , Otjes , S , Poguntke , T , Rasmussen , A , Saurugger , S , Webb , P & Witko , C 2022 , ' Introducing the Party-Interest Group Relationships in Contemporary Democracies (PAIRDEM) Datasets ' , Party Politics . https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221075591
Hansen, V. W., Rødland, L., Røed, M., Gall, C. L., Klüver, H, Marshall, D., Otjes, S, Pogunkte, T., Rasmussen, A, Saurugger, S., Webb, P. and Witko, C. (forthcoming) 'Introducing the Party-Interest Group Relationships in Contemporary Democracies (PAIRDEM) Datasets', Party Politics.
HauptbeschreibungBei Bundestagswahlen steht der Wähler mittlerweile ebenso sehr im Rampenlicht wie Politikerinnen und Politiker. Mit einer Vielzahl von Instrumenten wird dem Wahlvolk auf den Zahn gefühlt, sodass? oft schon vor den ersten Hochrechnungen? eigentlich jedem Journalisten, Politiker und Bürger klar ist, warum wer wen gewählt hat. Dass diese Einschätzung häufig auf zweifelhaften Quellen und Verfahren wie O-Tönen aus der Fußgängerzone beruht, spielt keine Rolle. So entstehen moderne Mythen über den deutschen Wähler, die sich trotz erheblicher Veränderungen bei Wählerschaft, Medien u.
In: Poguntke , T , Scarrow , S E , Webb , P D , Allern , E , Aylott , N , Bardi , L , Costa-Lobo , M , Cross , W P , Deschouwer , K , Eneydi , Z , Fabre , E , Farrell , D , Gauja , A , Kopeký , P , Koole , R , Verge Mestre , T , Müller , W , Pedersen , K , Rahat , G , Szczerbiak , A & van Haute , E 2016 , ' Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies How parties organize in the 21st century ' , Party Politics . https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816662493
This article introduces the first findings of the Political Party Database Project, a major survey of party organizations in parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies. The project's first round of data covers 122 parties in 19 countries. In this article, we describe the scope of the database, then investigate what it tells us about contemporary party organization in these countries, focusing on parties' resources, structures and internal decision-making. We examine organizational patterns by country and party family, and where possible we make temporal comparisons with older data sets. Our analyses suggest a remarkable coexistence of uniformity and diversity. In terms of the major organizational resources on which parties can draw, such as members, staff and finance, the new evidence largely confirms the continuation of trends identified in previous research: that is, declining membership, but enhanced financial resources and more paid staff. We also find remarkable uniformity regarding the core architecture of party organizations. At the same time, however, we find substantial variation between countries and party families in terms of their internal processes, with particular regard to how internally democratic they are, and the forms that this democratization takes.
In: Poguntke , T , Scarrow , S , Webb , P , Allern , E H , Aylott , N , Biezen , I V , Calossi , E , Costa Lobo , M , Cross , W P , Deschouwer , K , Enyedi , Z , Fabre , E , Farrell , D M , Gauja , A , Pizzimenti , E , Kopecky , P , Koole , R , Kosiara-Pedersen , K , Müller , W C , Rahat , G , Szczerbiak , A , van Haute , E & Verge , T 2016 , ' Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies : How parties organize in the 21st century ' , Party Politics , pp. 661-678 . https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816662493
This article introduces the first findings of the Political Party Database Project, a major survey of party organizations in parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies. The project's first round of data covers 122 parties in 19 countries. In this article, we describe the scope of the database, then investigate what it tells us about contemporary party organization in these countries, focusing on parties' resources, structures and internal decision-making. We examine organizational patterns by country and party family, and where possible we make temporal comparisons with older data sets. Our analyses suggest a remarkable coexistence of uniformity and diversity. In terms of the major organizational resources on which parties can draw, such as members, staff and finance, the new evidence largely confirms the continuation of trends identified in previous research: that is, declining membership, but enhanced financial resources and more paid staff. We also find remarkable uniformity regarding the core architecture of party organizations. At the same time, however, we find substantial variation between countries and party families in terms of their internal processes, with particular regard to how internally democratic they are, and the forms that this democratization takes. ; This article introduces the first findings of the Political Party Database Project, a major survey of party organizations in parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies. The project's first round of data covers 122 parties in 19 countries. In this article, we describe the scope of the database, then investigate what it tells us about contemporary party organization in these countries, focusing on parties' resources, structures and internal decision-making. We examine organizational patterns by country and party family, and where possible we make temporal comparisons with older data sets. Our analyses suggest a remarkable coexistence of uniformity and diversity. In terms of the major organizational resources on which parties can draw, such as members, staff and finance, the new evidence largely confirms the continuation of trends identified in previous research: that is, declining membership, but enhanced financial resources and more paid staff. We also find remarkable uniformity regarding the core architecture of party organizations. At the same time, however, we find substantial variation between countries and party families in terms of their internal processes, with particular regard to how internally democratic they are, and the forms that this democratization takes.
This article introduces the first findings of the Political Party Database Project, a major survey of party organizations in parliamentary and semi-presidential democracies. The project's first round of data covers 122 parties in 19 countries. In this article, we describe the scope of the database, then investigate what it tells us about contemporary party organization in these countries, focusing on parties' resources, structures and internal decision-making. We examine organizational patterns by country and party family, and where possible we make temporal comparisons with older data sets. Our analyses suggest a remarkable coexistence of uniformity and diversity. In terms of the major organizational resources on which parties can draw, such as members, staff and finance, the new evidence largely confirms the continuation of trends identified in previous research: that is, declining membership, but enhanced financial resources and more paid staff. We also find remarkable uniformity regarding the core architecture of party organizations. At the same time, however, we find substantial variation between countries and party families in terms of their internal processes, with particular regard to how internally democratic they are, and the forms that this democratization takes.