Suchergebnisse

Olivier Leclerc, Can there be a science of proof? A Cross-Atlantic dialogue (1898-1947) -- Maciej Dybowski, A Good Enough (Meta) Theory of Evidence in Law. An Inferentialist Account -- Weronika Dzięgielewska, Why Are We Bound by Evidence? On The Normative Stance of Legal Proof -- Bohdan Pretkiel, Rethinking expert opinion evidence as an argument from epistemic authority -- Margarida Lacombe Camargo, Constitutional Evidence -- Giovanni Tuzet, Testimony and Hearsay -- Marcin Romanowicz, Neuroscientific Evidence in Courtroom: Clash of Two Anthropological Paradigms -- John R. Harris, An Epistemic Defense of Exclusionary Rules in the Criminal Justice System -- Adam Dyrda and Maciej Próchnicki, Expert's (Meta)Testimony: An Epistemological Perspective -- Daniela Accatino, The Architecture of Evidential Justification between Atomism and Holism.

The Unified Growth Theory is receiving increasing attention from growth theorists since the seminal work of Galor and Weil (1999, 2000). These authors emphasize the need for a unified theory of growth that could account for the transition from Malthusian Stagnation to the Modern Growth Regime (1999). This interest is motivated by the lack of explanation and knowledge regarding the historical evolution of the relationship among population growth, technological change and the standard of living. This paper gives an overview of the Unified Growth Theory, its determinants and its implications.