Suchergebnisse

The term, Artificial Intelligence (AI), has changed since it was first coined by John MacCarthy in 1956. AI, believed to have been created with Kurt Gödel's unprovable computational statements in 1931, is now called deep learning or machine learning. AI is defined as a computer machine with the ability to make predictions about the future and solve complex tasks, using algorithms. The AI algorithms are enhanced and become effective with big data capturing the present and the past while still necessarily reflecting human biases into models and equations. AI is also capable of making choices like humans, mirroring human reasoning. AI can help robots to efficiently repeat the same labor intensive procedures in factories and can analyze historic and present data efficiently through deep learning, natural language processing, and anomaly detection. Thus, AI covers a spectrum of augmented intelligence relating to prediction, autonomous intelligence relating to decision making, automated intelligence for labor robots, and assisted intelligence for data analysis.

The purpose of the study is to find ways of overcoming the etatistician legal tradition of regulating human rights in Ukraine in relation to the rights of the nation and the people. The contradictions between the articles of the Constitution of Ukraine on a person and his rights with his articles on restriction of human rights are revealed; between articles about the Ukrainian people and articles about the nation and national interests. The causal relationship between the positivist understanding of law as established and regulated by the state and the practice of legal regulation of human rights, the nation and the people as subjective objects, and not the natural subjects of civil society and the state - theirs, is investigated. servant. Alternative legal regulation based on the dialectic of the individual (person), special (nation), general (people) with the defining role of the people in the law, which includes not only legislation, but also norms of morality, customs, traditions, treaties, is argued. The ideological extremes of legal regulation are criticized: the hypertrophy of anthropocentrism and the sovereignty of the people. The key importance of the elimination of poverty of the people and the creation of a majority of middle-class middle-class majority for the achievement of the main goal of legal regulation of human rights, nation and people – to ensure their freedom is substantiated. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn: on the advisability of adopting an official legal doctrine in Ukraine on the basis of modern European law of understanding as a source of law; on scientific development of subjects of non-state legal regulation; on amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine regarding the relation between the concepts of nations and peoples and the possibility of limiting a person not in rights, but in their implementation; on the criteria for the equitable legal regulation of mutual human rights, the nation and the people: its fullest endorsement by the majority of these entities as equal in their rights on the basis of the widest consensus between them throughout Ukraine and its individual regions and a steady tendency to increase the middle class in composition people.Key words: legal regulation, etatism, anthropocentrism, human rights, people, nations. ; Мета дослідження – пошук шляхів подолання етатистської правової традиції правового регулювання прав людини у їх співвідношенні з правами націй та народу. Аргументується альтернатива, основана на діалектиці одиничного (людина), особливого (нація), загального (народ) з визначальною роллю народу щодо права, яке включає до свого змісту не тільки законодавство, але й норми моралі, звичаїв, традицій, договорів. Обґрунтовується ключове значення ліквідації бідності людей і створення в складі народу більшості середнього класу для досягнення головної мети правового регулювання прав людини, націй і народу – забезпечення їх свободи.Ключові слова: правове регулювання, етатизм, антропоцентризм, права людини, нації, народу.