309439 results
Sort by:
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Volume 28, Issue 4, p. 100-120
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: International Studies Quarterly, Volume 37, Issue 3, p. 271
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Volume 28, Specia, p. 100
ISSN: 1036-1146
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Volume 28, Issue SPECIAL, p. 100-120
ISSN: 1036-1146
FOR AUSTRALIA, THE QUESTION OF A REPUBLIC IS A NATIONALIST ISSUE. THE CAMPAIGN FOR AN AUSTRALIAN REPUBLIC MUST, THEREFORE, BE CONSIDERED IN THE CONTEXT OF THE EVOLUTION OF MATTERS RELATING TO THE TIES BETWEEN AUSTRALIA AND BRITAIN. THESE INCLUDE THE AUSTRALIAN FLAG, THE GOVERNOR-GENERALATE, IMPERIAL AND AUSTRALIAN HONORS, THE NATIONAL ANTHEM, APPEALS TO THE PRIVY COUNCIL, AND THE AUSTRALIA ACT OF 1986. IN THIS PAPER, THESE AND OTHER ISSUES ARE EXAMINED IN AN HISTORICAL CONTEXT. PARTICULAR ATTENTION IS PAID TO THE POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF VARIOUS FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS FROM FEDERATION THROUGH THE KEATING GOVERNMENT.
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Volume 37, Issue 3, p. 271-296
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
In: African affairs: the journal of the Royal African Society, Volume 91, Issue 362, p. 141-142
ISSN: 1468-2621
In: Contributions to political economy, Volume 11, Issue 1, p. 41-66
ISSN: 1464-3588
In: Utrecht studies in air and space law 9
In: Social sciences and modern states: national experiences and theoretical crossroads, p. 230-260
In: International journal / Canadian Institute of International Affairs, Volume 45, Issue 4, p. 959-962
ISSN: 2052-465X
In: Publizistik, Volume 35, Issue 4, p. 424-436
ISSN: 1862-2569
In: Gérontologie et société, Volume 13 / n° 53, Issue 2, p. 45-50
In: Behavioral & social sciences librarian, Volume 8, Issue 1-2, p. 51-66
ISSN: 1544-4546
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Volume 41, Issue 4, p. 500-535
ISSN: 1086-3338
This essay addresses the question, "Why do different democracies pursue different public policies?" through an examination of taxation policy in the United States, Sweden, and Britain. The essay demonstrates how the different decision-making structures found in these three democracies (characterized as pluralist, corporatist, and party government systems, respectively) bias each polity toward different types of policy outcomes. The key argument is that institutional structures are the context in which political actors must necessarily define their policy preferences and determine their strategic objectives. Institutional structures thus provide a central link between individual choice behavior and macro policy outcomes.