The 'Crisis' in Political Development Theory
In: The journal of development studies: JDS, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 165-185
ISSN: 0022-0388
The 'crisis' approach in a variety of manifestations has been represented as the acme of political development theorizing. In assessing the criterion which makes one conceptual model superior to another the 'crisis' theory is critically appraised. An exploration into the philosophy of social science expresses that the choice of a framework be underpinned by an awareness of its uses in the realms of political analysis & political action. Applying this mode of evaluation to 2 main variants of crisis models--one by G. Almond, S. Flanagan, & R. Mundt, Ed's, (CRISIS, CHOICE, AND CHANGE: HISTORICAL STUDIES OF POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, Boston, Mass: Little Brown, 1973) & the other by L. Binder, J. Coleman, J. LaPalombara, L. Pye, S. Verba & M. Weiner (CRISIS AND SEQUENCES IN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT, Princeton, NJ: Princeton U Press, 1971)--neither is found to possess sufficient explanatory power based on a necessary provision of "law-like" generalizations about political development. The expectation is for these inadequate models to shift from explanation to prescription of political action. Modified HA.