Primary Boys and Hegemonic Masculinities
In: British journal of sociology of education, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 349-369
ISSN: 1465-3346
4918 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: British journal of sociology of education, Band 18, Heft 3, S. 349-369
ISSN: 1465-3346
In: Men and masculinities, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 107-108
ISSN: 1552-6828
In: Men and masculinities, Band 9, Heft 2, S. 261-268
ISSN: 1552-6828
World Affairs Online
In: Men and masculinities, Band 6, Heft 4, S. 319-329
ISSN: 1552-6828
In: Berghahn monographs in French studies
This text is based on over 10 years research with 500 men from different classes, backgrounds, races and ethnic groups. It constructs a theory of masculinity by exploring masculine expectancies, how men form their gender identities and how those identities influence their behaviour
In: In S. Magaraggia and D. Cherubini (eds.) Men Against Women: The Roots of Male Violence UTET University, Italy, 2013, pp: 77-‐102
SSRN
In: Norma: Nordic journal for masculinity studies, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 115-131
ISSN: 1890-2146
In: The Journal of men's studies, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 374-376
ISSN: 1060-8265, 1933-0251
In: Men and masculinities, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 16-33
ISSN: 1552-6828
Feminist scholarship on masculinities ossified into a recognizable "subfield" of gender studies, in part, through systematically centering the work of a very small group of white men. This process of collective centering works as an effective "exclusionary practice" that I argue hinders both the scholarly and political potential of this field. This article examines the transformation of the status of the subfield alongside an examination of women's contributions to feminist scholarship on masculinities, and an emergent politics of citation that works to reproduce inequality within this subfield. In addition to identifying the processes by which a small group of white men have accumulated a disproportionate amount of power and status within "masculinities studies" as problematic, I also question the lack of critical dialogue and debate between various subfields examining systems of power and structured advantage. Here, I put masculinities studies into conversation with whiteness studies, critical heterosexualities studies, research on elites, and more to argue that there should be more dialogue between scholars doing research in these areas. Disrupting exclusionary practices in masculinities studies with both political and practical intent will better situate feminist scholars of masculinities to adapt their scholarship to transformations in the character and form of durable systems of inequality as well as identifying emergent processes and mechanisms of social reproduction.