Suchergebnisse

В статье рассматриваются дискурсивные практики внедрения неподтвержденной информации в массмедийном политическом дискурсе.

Objective: Along with the rapid spread of the COVID-19 pandemic around the globe, a proliferation of mass media information exposed the population to an infodemic with various implications documented worldwide. The present study analyzed Romanian healthcare practitioners' (HCPs) appraisal of COVID-19 mass media information and governmental measures throughout 2020, ranking vaccination priorities and moral values. Methods: 97 HCP completed a cross-sectional survey with items referring to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Results: Findings were consistent with other studies, indicating an overall negative appraisal of mass media information, which predicted anxiety and relaxation difficulties. Unlike other studies, our sample reported a moderate level of satisfaction with official measures in 2020, which was not related to their view on mass media information. The ranking of population categories in the vaccination order showed similarities with the governmental vaccination program in 2021. Despite placing freedom third after health and love in the hierarchy of values, HCPs showed a high tendency of limiting individual liberty for the common good. Conclusions: Results showed a dissociation between the overall negative appraisal of mass media information and the satisfaction with governmental measures in 2020. Romanian HCPs shared a secular perspective on moral values and assumed an authoritarian position.

Do audiences need the government's protection from mass media? Or are they capable of choosing media and protecting themselves? For decades, judicial opinion on this issue developed in the form of judicial notice, speculation, and assumption. Yet during that time, a rich social science discipline was emerging that could have helped to address these issues based on empirical research about mass media effects and audiences. Given the renewed importance of this issue, it is time to bridge the gap between the law of mass media content regulation and the social science research into mass media consumption. To that end, this article presents an interdisciplinary critique of the law's assumptions about the effects of mass media on the audience, the nature of that audience, and how those assumptions have shaped First Amendment doctrine. Part I reviews important First Amendment rulings concerning content regulation of electronic media, as well as analogous cases involving non-broadcast speech. The goal is to identify the judicial assumptions used to justify giving less First Amendment protection to broadcasting than to other media. Part II critiques these assumptions against the conclusions of social science theorists who have been studying the question of mass communications effects and audiences since the early twentieth century. This critique shows that most of the law's current assumptions about the nature of mass communications are based on an early, and now discredited, view of mass communications effects known as the "Hypodermic Needle Model." More sophisticated models have since supplanted the Hypodermic Needle Model, which failed to account for the interactive and social dimensions of mass communication. Finally, Part III returns to the question of how new media should be treated under the First Amendment and analyzes the potential impact of the critique presented in Part II on the development of the law of content regulation in the twenty-first century.

The modern Media Space is a system that uses integrated new methods of communication. The article is focused on the analysis of «matrix of communication» category by intent-analysis in the programs of China Radio International. The role and the main intentions of forming the China's image in the media discourse are revealed.

Through this paper we analyze the influence of mass media in the overthrow of the dictatorship in Nicaragua. After two years of armed conflict, the guerrilla organization "FSLN (Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional)" took the power and end to the Somoza dynasty in 1979. Throughout the bibliographic review we will pay special attention to the existing links between political, military and communicative events. ; En este trabajo analizamos la influencia de los medios de comunicación de masas en el derrocamiento de la dictadura en Nicaragua. Tras dos años de lucha armada, la organización guerrillera Frente Sandinista de Liberación Nacional (FSLN) se hizo con el poder y puso fin a la dinastía de los Somoza en 1979. A través de la revisión bibliográfica pondremos especial atención en los nexos existentes entre los acontecimientos políticos, militares y comunicativos.