Suchergebnisse

AbstractDespite appearances to the contrary, the International Court of Justice can and does have much to say on matters of criminal justice. This article considers four areas in which such matters arise before the Court: jurisdiction over criminal offences allegedly committed abroad and immunity from that jurisdiction; principles of individual criminal liability and the potential for concurrent State responsibility; issues of evidence and proof; and the Court's review of the exercise of those domestic criminal powers which are subject to international regulation. In the process of addressing these issues, the ICJ has contributed to the development of fundamental principles of criminal law, while drawing on the experience of domestic courts.

Frontmatter -- CONTENTS -- CONTRIBUTORS -- PREFACE -- INTRODUCTION -- 1. THE MORAL AND METAPHYSICAL SOURCES OF THE CRIMINAL LAW -- 2. INTENTIONALITY AND THE CONCEPT OF THE PERSON -- 3. THE DECONSTRUCTION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF INTENT -- 4. CLASSIFICATION-BASED SENTENCING: SOME CONCEPTUAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEMS -- 5. HOW TO MAKE THE PUNISHMENT FIT THE CRIME -- 6. RETRIBUTIVISM AND THE STATE'S INTEREST IN PUNISHMENT -- 7. A MOTIVATIONAL THEORY OF EXCUSES IN THE CRIMINAL LAW -- 8. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY IN GOVERNMENT -- 9. A COMMENT ON "CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY IN GOVERNMENT" -- 10. THE LEGAL AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY OF ORGANIZATIONS -- 11. ON THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF CRIME -- 12. COMMENT ON "ON THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF CRIME" -- 13. CRIME, KICKERS, AND TRANSACTION STRUCTURES -- 14. IS THERE AN ECONOMIC THEORY OF CRIME? -- BIBLIOGRAPHY -- INDEX

Restorative justice underlies various legal solutions all over the world. The Polish legislator also made reference to restorative justice by including the settlement between the offender and the victim among sentencing directives. The objective of this article is to conduct a more detailed examination of this directive in relation to the essence of RJ, and then to review and analyse the solutions adopted in Polish criminal law in terms of their usefulness for the implementation of the objectives of restorative justice. The text will concentrate on those instruments and penal measures which are not designed to be used for repression against the offender and create – at least seemingly – space for objectives closer to RJ. The compensatory measures, the probative measures and an active repentance will be taken into account. The Polish criminal law is consistent with the continental model existing in all Europe. Therefore, conclusions resulting from this analysis may provide inspiration also for authors functioning in normative realities other than Polish. ; 1. Consedine J (2004) Sprawiedliwość naprawcza. Przywrócenie ładu społecznego. Warsaw. 2. Wilk L, Zawiejski P (2015) The Concept of Restorative Justice. In: Dukiet-Nagórska T (Ed.), The Postulates of Restorative Justice and the Continental Model of Criminal Law. Frankfurt am Main. 3. Zalewski W (2017) Sprawiedliwość naprawcza. In: Kaczmarek T (Ed.), System Prawa Karnego. Nauka o karze. Sądowy wymiar kary. Warsaw. 4. Zalewski W (2006) Sprawiedliwość naprawcza. Początek ewolucji polskiego prawa karnego? Gdańsk. 5. Zawiejski P (2016) Idea sprawiedliwości naprawczej. In: Dukiet-Nagórska T (Ed.), Idea sprawiedliwości naprawczej a zasady kontynentalnego prawa karnego. Warsaw. 6. Christie N (1977) Conflicts as Property. British Journal of Criminology 17(1): 1-15. 7. Christie N (1991) Granice cierpienia. Warsaw. 8. Zehr H (1990) Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale. 9. Płatek M (2005) Teoria sprawiedliwości naprawczej. In: Płatek M, Fajst M (Eds.), Sprawiedliwość naprawcza. Idea. Teoria. Praktyka. Warsaw. 10. Hanc J (2015) The Idea of Restorative Justice: An Attempt at a Comparative Analysis. In: DukietNagórska T (Ed.), the Postulates of Restorative Justice and the Continental Model of Criminal Law. Frankfurt am Main. 11. Braithwaite J (1989) Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge. 12. Sitarz O (2016) Znaczenie normy wywodzonej z przepisu art. 53 § 3 kk dla (dyrektyw) sądowego wymiaru kary. In: Dukiet-Nagórska T (Ed.), Idea sprawiedliwości naprawczej a zasady kontynentalnego prawa karnego. Warsaw. 13. Wójcik D (2010) In: Marek A (Ed.), System prawa karnego. Zagadnienia ogólne. Warsaw. 14. Bienkowska E (2011) Mediacja w sprawach karnych. Stan prawny na 1 wrzesnia 2011 r. Warsaw. 15. Rączkowski S (1999) Postępowanie mediacyjne według Kodeksu postępowania karnego. In: Bogunia L (Ed.), Nowa kodyfikacja prawa karnego. Wroclaw 4. 16. Buchala K (1998) Kodeksu karnego. In: Buchała K, Zoll A, Komentarz do kk (Eds.), Kodeks karny. Czesc ogolna. Komentarz do art. 1-116. 17. Murzynowski A (2005) Rola mediacji w osiąganiu sprawiedliwości w procesie karnym. In: Płatek M, Fajst M (Eds.), Sprawiedliwość naprawcza. Idea. Teoria. Praktyka. Warsaw. 18. Murzynowski A (2002) Mediacja w toku postępowania przygotowawczego. In: Stachowiak S (Ed.), Współczesny polski proces karny. Poznań. 19. Bek D (2015) The Mediation settlement as a directive of the level of sanction. In: Dukiet-Nagórska T (Ed.), the Postulates of Restorative Justice and the Continental Model of Criminal Law. Frankfurt am Main. 20. Bienkowska E (1999) Kodeks karny. Czesc ogolna. Komentarz. Warsaw. 21. Kużelewski D (2009) Wpływ prawa karnego materialnego na mediacje między pokrzywdzonym i oskarżonym – wybrane aspekty. In: Ćwiąkalski Z, Artymiuk G (Eds.), prawa karnego materialnego i procesowego w świetle kodyfikacji karnych z 1997 r. i propozycji ich zmian. Warsaw. 22. Hyps S (2015) Środki probacyjne. In: Grześkowiak A, Wiak K (Eds.), Prawo karne. Warsaw. 23. Skupiński J (2012) Podstawowe problemy interpretacyjne unormowań dotyczących środków probacyjnych. In: Majewski J (Ed.) Środki związane z poddaniem sprawcy próbie. Warsaw. 24. Dukiet-Nagórska T (2016) Obowiązek naprawczy a specyfika prawa karnego. In: Dukiet-Nagórska T (Ed.), Idea sprawiedliwości naprawczej a zasady kontynentalnego prawa karnego. Warsaw. 25. Pawela S (2003) Prawo karne wykonawcze. Zarys wykładu. Krakow. 26. Consedine J (2005) Sprawiedliwość naprawcza – kompensacyjna praktyka prawa karnego. Mediator 3. 27. Skupiński J (2015) In: Stefański RA (Ed.), Kodeks karny. Komentarz. Warsaw.

Marketing Global Justice is a critical study of efforts to 'sell' global justice. The book offers a new reading of the rise of international criminal law as the dominant institutional expression of global justice, linking it to the rise of branding. The political economy analysis employed highlights that a global elite benefit from marketised global justice whilst those who tend to be the 'faces' of global injustice - particularly victims of conflict - are instrumentalised and ultimately commodified. The book is an invitation to critically consider the predominance of market values in global justice, suggesting an 'occupying' of global justice as an avenue for drawing out social values.

Introduction -- Legality and fair labelling at stake -- The principle of legality in international law -- The principle of fair labelling in international law -- The retroactive application of the Rome Statute explained -- The existing views on the retroactive application of the Rome Statute -- The nature of the Rome Statute -- Article 21(3) of the Rome Statute and the Application of Criminal Law in accordance with 'internationally recognized Human Rights' -- Conclusion.

1. What are justice and social justice? -- 2. What do Americans value? -- 3. The criminal justice system -- 4. Social construction of different groups -- 5. Race, ethnicity, and social justice -- 6. Latinos and social justice -- 7. Native Americans and social justice -- 8. Social class and the law -- 9. Women and social justice -- 10. Sexuality and social justice -- 11. Summary and prospects for the future.