The Logic of the New Pay Systems Revisited-in the Light of Experimental and Behavioral Economics
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 161-169
ISSN: 0190-0692
700969 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 161-169
ISSN: 0190-0692
In: RatSWD Working Paper No. 79
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 69, Heft 4, S. 897-907
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Twin research, Band 7, Heft 5, S. 485-504
ISSN: 2053-6003
In: The Journal of psychodrama, sociometry, and group psychotherapy, Band 55, Heft 1, S. 3-14
ISSN: 1940-5014
In: Review of social economy: the journal for the Association for Social Economics, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 163-192
ISSN: 1470-1162
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS, Band 7, Heft 1, S. 77
ISSN: 0730-9384
In: The journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps: JASH, Band 11, Heft 4, S. 317-321
In: Journal of education for social work, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 15-27
In: Human relations: towards the integration of the social sciences, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 363-371
ISSN: 1573-9716, 1741-282X
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 61, Heft 4, S. 719-720
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: Differences: a journal of feminist cultural studies, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 74-96
ISSN: 1527-1986
In his paper "The Return to Philology," Paul de Man insists that philology and theory should not be in conflict, but should, rather, mutually enhance one another. This claim that the turn to theory is also a return to philology is explored in the context of the structure of language. In the last twenty to twenty-five years, the return to philology has been a dominant part of the Anglo-Saxon discourse of "world literature," which has turned away from theory. The return to philology is captured in a market-based adaptation of literature in terms of globalization, transnationalism, and translation. In his latest book The Birth and Death of Literary Theory (2019), Galin Tihanov recalls the legacy of classical literary theory and propounds the contemporary discourse of world literature as an unreflected continuation of this legacy as it was articulated in Viktor Shklovsky's and Mikhail Bakhtin's approaches to literature beyond language. Turning this legacy on its head, this essay focuses, rather, on language in literature. In a short-circuiting way, Roman Jakobson's linguistics and poetics and Erich Auerbach's nonnational-based philology can be seen as surprisingly close to one another.
In: Telos: critical theory of the contemporary, Band 1978, Heft 38, S. 124-153
ISSN: 1940-459X