International Political Science Abstracts
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 1-162
ISSN: 1751-9292
6417369 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 71, Heft 1, S. 1-162
ISSN: 1751-9292
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 70, Heft 6, S. 759-937
ISSN: 1751-9292
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 70, Heft 5, S. 633-758
ISSN: 1751-9292
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 70, Heft 4, S. 479-632
ISSN: 1751-9292
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 70, Heft 3, S. 311-478
ISSN: 1751-9292
In: International political science abstracts: IPSA, Band 70, Heft 2, S. 161-310
ISSN: 1751-9292
ISSN: 1507-7896
ISSN: 0137-4176
In: Fordham Law Review, Band 81
SSRN
In: Perspectives on political science, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 135-141
ISSN: 1930-5478
In: Philippine political science journal, Band 3, Heft 3, S. 36-52
ISSN: 2165-025X
In: Review of policy research, Band 30, Heft 5, S. 439-446
ISSN: 1541-1338
Blogs have become everyday acquaintances in digital life. Although personal, political, and fashion blogs may be the best known, academics also engage in blogging about research. With fast-expanding digital publishing of all kinds, we may have to rethink the status of blogging in relation to our on-going research. This article discusses the perception of science blogs, and their status as a genre. It explores some blog threads talking about research blogging: are blogs a great way to improve outreach, or just dumbing down? Should we use blogs for publishing serious findings, or brush them aside as edutainment – preferably done by somebody else? Research blogs are explored in the context of science communication and research writing traditions, and their old and new features discussed.
BASE
In: The review of politics, Band 49, Heft 1, S. 59-84
ISSN: 1748-6858
The modern science of politics has agreed with Thomas Hobbes that government must be based on the rejection of Aristotle's belief that claims to rule might be judged and accepted on their substantive merit as a matter of justice. The present essay examines the premodern approach as found in Aristotle's treatment of the question of regimes in the Politics. It is argued that the interpretation of Aristotle's discussion that understands him to distinguish right and deviant regimes as these are in the interest of ruled or rulers respectively and to seek a resolution of the conflict between claims to rule as a kind or instance of distributive justice is belied by a close reading of his Politics and Nicomachean Ethics and collapses distinctions crucial to Aristotelian political science.