6211211 results
Sort by:
In: Orbis: FPRI's journal of world affairs, Volume 47, Issue 1, p. 161-169
ISSN: 0030-4387
In: Journal of policy history: JPH, Volume 13, Issue 1, p. 133-156
ISSN: 0898-0306
In: Journal of policy history: JPH, Volume 13, Issue 1, p. 47-72
ISSN: 0898-0306
In: The American journal of sociology, Volume 99, Issue 2, p. 531-532
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: History of European ideas, Volume 10, Issue 2, p. 251-252
ISSN: 0191-6599
In: The Middle East journal, Volume 36, Issue 3, p. 415
ISSN: 0026-3141
In: The Middle East journal, Volume 35, Issue 3, p. 397
ISSN: 0026-3141
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Volume 43, Issue 4, p. 587-588
ISSN: 0033-362X
In: The American journal of sociology, Volume 84, Issue 1, p. 204-205
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: American anthropologist: AA, Volume 78, Issue 1, p. 175-176
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: Boston College Law Review, Volume 42, p. 771
SSRN
In Religion, Politics, and Polarization, three esteemed scholars trace the confluence of religion and party in the US Congress over time. The authors examine several issues of contemporary relevance as they trace the increasing polarization in Congress.
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Volume 4, Issue 1, p. 187-189
ISSN: 1755-0491
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Volume 59, Issue 1, p. 72-77
ISSN: 1363-030X
In: Politics and religion: official journal of the APSA Organized Section on Religion and Politics, Volume 9, Issue 1, p. 187-190
ISSN: 1755-0491
While there have been many approaches to classifying religious traditions in the social sciences (see Hackett and Lindsay 2008), the most popular approach is the religious tradition classification scheme, which was most carefully systematized by Steensland et al. (2000). Their widely-embraced article argued that the most accurate typology of religiosity was to sort individuals into seven distinct groups: evangelical Protestant, mainline Protestant, black Protestant, Jewish, Catholic, other religious groups, and no religion. This approach has become popularly known as "reltrad" and its usage in academic writing is voluminous. A brief search of Google Scholar indicates that over 900 published articles and books utilized the reltrad framework. However, the implementation of this typology has never been fully and accurately operationalized.