Suchergebnisse

International audience ; This article deals with the pertinence of the notion of leadership for improving the understanding of the changing patterns of territorial power and action that have occured over the last twenty years. Having conducted a review of the existing approach to this question, the authors underline the importance of a gap in this research: the relationship between leadership and territory. As an antidote, they then propose a three dimensional analytical grid which simultaneously tackles: territorial configurations of power, the political construction of leadership and the role of territorial identiy. This proposition is illustrated with examples taken from a range of empirical research conducted by the authors themselves. ; Cet article propose de reconsidérer l'utilité de la notion de leadership à la lumière des changements qui affectent, depuis 20 ans, les cadres de l'action et du pouvoir territoriaux. Après une revue critique de la littérature sur la question, les auteurs envisagent le rapport entre leadership et territoire à la lumière de trois dimensions : la configuration territoriale, la construction politique et le rapport à l'identité territoriale du leadership. Ils fondent leurs analyses sur plusieurs études de terrain.

International audience ; This article deals with the pertinence of the notion of leadership for improving the understanding of the changing patterns of territorial power and action that have occured over the last twenty years. Having conducted a review of the existing approach to this question, the authors underline the importance of a gap in this research: the relationship between leadership and territory. As an antidote, they then propose a three dimensional analytical grid which simultaneously tackles: territorial configurations of power, the political construction of leadership and the role of territorial identiy. This proposition is illustrated with examples taken from a range of empirical research conducted by the authors themselves. ; Cet article propose de reconsidérer l'utilité de la notion de leadership à la lumière des changements qui affectent, depuis 20 ans, les cadres de l'action et du pouvoir territoriaux. Après une revue critique de la littérature sur la question, les auteurs envisagent le rapport entre leadership et territoire à la lumière de trois dimensions : la configuration territoriale, la construction politique et le rapport à l'identité territoriale du leadership. Ils fondent leurs analyses sur plusieurs études de terrain.

International audience ; This article deals with the pertinence of the notion of leadership for improving the understanding of the changing patterns of territorial power and action that have occured over the last twenty years. Having conducted a review of the existing approach to this question, the authors underline the importance of a gap in this research: the relationship between leadership and territory. As an antidote, they then propose a three dimensional analytical grid which simultaneously tackles: territorial configurations of power, the political construction of leadership and the role of territorial identiy. This proposition is illustrated with examples taken from a range of empirical research conducted by the authors themselves. ; Cet article propose de reconsidérer l'utilité de la notion de leadership à la lumière des changements qui affectent, depuis 20 ans, les cadres de l'action et du pouvoir territoriaux. Après une revue critique de la littérature sur la question, les auteurs envisagent le rapport entre leadership et territoire à la lumière de trois dimensions : la configuration territoriale, la construction politique et le rapport à l'identité territoriale du leadership. Ils fondent leurs analyses sur plusieurs études de terrain.

This article proposes reconsidering the usefulness of the concept of leadership in the light of the changes that have affected, over the last 20 years, the frameworks for territorial action and power. After a critical review of the literature on the issue, the authors consider the relationship between leadership and territory in the light of three dimensions: territorial configuration, political construction and the link to the territorial identity of leadership. They base their analyses on several field studies. ; International audience This article deals with the pertinence of the notion of leadership for improving the understanding of the changing patterns of territorial power and action that have occured over the last twenty years. Having conducted a review of the existing approach to this question, the authors underline the importance of a gap in this research: the relationship between leadership and territory. As an antidote, they then propose a three dimensional analytical grid which simultaneously tackles: territorial configurations of power, the political construction of leadership and the role of territorial identiy. This proposition is illustrated with examples taken from a range of empirical research conducted by the authors themselves. ; This article proposes reconsidering the usefulness of the concept of leadership in the light of the changes that have affected, over the last 20 years, the frameworks for territorial action and power. After a critical review of the literature on the issue, the authors consider the relationship between leadership and territory in the light of three dimensions: territorial configuration, political construction and the link to the territorial identity of leadership. They base their analyses on several field studies. ; Cet article propose de reconsidérer l'utilité de la notion de leadership à la lumière des changements qui affectent, depuis 20 ans, les cadres de l'action et du pouvoir territoriaux. Après une revue critique de la littérature sur la question, les auteurs ...

This article deals with the pertinence of the notion of leadership for improving the understanding of the changing patterns of territorial powerand action that have occured over the last twenty years. Having conducted areview of the existing approach to this question, the authors underline theimportance of a gap in this research: the relationship between leadershipand territory. As an antidote, they then propose a three dimensional analytical grid which simultaneously tackles: territorial configurations of power, the political construction of leadership and the role of territorial identiy. This proposition is illustrated with examples taken from a range of empirical research conducted by the authors themselves.

Policy analysis in France lays the foundation for a more systematic understanding of policy analysis in the country. In doing so, the volume discusses the role of the State and its restructuring, processes of government and governance, and State-Society relationships and policies as both a process and an outcome. Through 18 chapters contributions focus on policymakers, their practices, ideas and discourses, how they engage in sustained relationships with a large variety of market and society actors, and the concrete devices they use in order to make policy objectives operational. This is a comprehensive study of policy analysis in France that will be valuable to academics and postgraduate students researching and studying a range of policy and public management areas