Search results

Political Science; European Union - De onderzoeksvraag van deze studie is viervoudig: hoe is de ontwikkeling van het standpunt van de Nederlandse regering geweest aangaande de ondersteuning van de december-2004-verdrag?
hoe was het mogelijke EU-lidmaatschap van Turkije ontvangen door het Nederlandse publiek en media?
in hoeverre waren er legitimiteitsproblemen aangaande het formele Nederlandse standpunt betreffende de ambitie van Turkije zich aan te sluiten bij de EU?
zou een andere manier van inbedding van de mogelijke Turkse toetreding geleid hebben tot een meer erkende positie van de Nederlandse regering?
De serie WRR-webpublicaties omvat studies die in het kader van de werkzaamheden van de WRR tot stand zijn gekomen. De verantwoordelijkheid voor de inhoud en de ingenomen standpunten berust bij de auteurs.

This paper provides a comprehensive theoretical model of the political decision making process. Therein two ideologically different political parties compete for power. Their primary instrument in this competition are programmatic concessions in favor of voters and interest groups. As any concession causes losses in utility for the party members, the parties try to win the election with as little concessions as possible. The efficient amount of concessions and their distribution on different groups of voters and interest groups is derived. These concessions are taken as an indicator for the influence of these two groups of political agents on the political decision making process. Hence the political model developed in this paper helps to determine the political influence of voters and interest groups. The illustrations show that the efficient amount of concessions depends on the closeness of the election race. The closer the initial distribution of votes, the more concessions can voters and interest groups wring from the political parties. The characteristics of the political landscape, e.g. the share of informed voters and the degree of ideological polarization, are found to determine the efficient amount of concessions and thus the influence of voters and interest groups on the political decision making process.

"This book focuses on the history of the WIC in Brazil in order to study the role of lobbying for political decision making in the seventeenth- century Dutch Republic, and argues that lobbying was the primary tool for people to implement, shape, and maintain institutions. Considering this impact, it is astonishing that lobbying has been underappreciated and regularly neglected by historians of all sub- disciplines"--

In the article, the conceptual basis of the discussion of political solutions in contemporary political science is revealed. The stages of evolution of political decisionizm and its reflection on political theory is defined. The stages of political decision-making process in conditions of sustainable democracy and transition countries are represented. The paradigmatic dimension of the study of political decisions as a scientific problem is revealed. Attention is paid to the positions of the effectiveness and efficiency of policy decisions in a multidisciplinary scientific perspective. It is noted that the contradictions between the demands of the effectiveness and rationality of the political decisions projects are visible. It is proved that the decision-making centers are oriented to the logic of administrative control and forced to change priorities in accordance with the changes of the political situation and balance of the interaction between the political forces. It is emphasized that decision-making process formalizes available alternatives and predicts the con-sequences of actions. In general, there is a trend towards the standardization of the political decision-making process.Key words: political solution, political procedure, political efficacy, political rationality, political result, political discourse. ; У статті розглядаються концептуальні засади обговорення політичних рішень у сучасній політичній науці, визначаються етапи еволюції політичного децизіонізму та його відображення в політичній теорії. Роз-глядаються етапи ухвалення політичних рішень в умовах сталої демократії й транзитивних країн. Вивчаються парадигмальні виміри політичних рішень як наукової проблеми. Звертається увага на позиції щодо ефектив-ності та раціональності політичних рішень у міждисциплінарній науковій перспективі. Зазначається, що про-тиріччя між вимогами ефективності й раціональності проектних політичних рішень проявляються у сфері взаємодії державно-владного управління та політичних чинників. Доводиться, що центри прийняття рішень, налаштовані на директивно-адміністративну логіку управління, змушені змінювати пріоритети відповідно до зміни політичної кон'юнктури й зміни балансу взаємодії між політичними силами. Підкреслюється, що діяль-ність щодо ухвалення рішень є процесом, який формалізує наявні альтернативи й прогнозує наслідки певних дій. У цілому існує тенденція до стандартизації процесу управлінських рішень. Визначається, що стандарт-ність ухвалення рішень у ситуаціях невизначеності доповнюється впливом зовнішніх чинників. Ключові слова: політичне рішення, політична процедура, політична ефективність, політична раціо-нальність, політичний результат, політичний дискурс.

Public deliberation has risen to the forefront of governance as a technique for increasing participation in policy making. Scholars and practitioners have also noted the potential for deliberation to give greater influence to historically marginalized populations, such as Indigenous peoples. However, there has been less attention paid to the potential fit between the ideals of deliberation and the governance and decision making practices of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) peoples. In this paper, we begin to address this gap by analyzing accounts of AI/AN governance from the perspective of deliberation, and note areas of overlap, synergy, and conflict. We conduct a close reading of key historical and ethnographic accounts of four historical AI/AN contexts—the Iroquois Confederation under the Great Law of Peace, 19th century accounts of the Ojibwa village, the Santa Clara Pueblo government in pre-19th century, and Yup'ik village life in the early 20th century—and a more contemporary case in the form of the Santa Clara Pueblo's Constitution from the Indian Reorganization Act period. We then apply two sets of key criteria for deliberative democracy—from the scholars Robert Dahl and John Gastil—to these accounts and note the ways in which each system is or is not congruent with these frameworks of deliberation. We find variations between these historical tribal contexts in our analysis. Social components of deliberation, such as respectful discussion and equal opportunities to participate, were partially or fully present in many accounts of governance practices, but it was less clear whether the analytic components, such as discussion of a range of solutions, were included in some forms of tribal governance. We then explore the potential implications of our findings for public deliberation within and in AI/AN tribes. We note that deliberative scholars and practitioners should be wary of over-generalizing about AI/AN tribes.

Previous studies of political decision making have used only "static" choice sets, where alternatives are "fixed" and area prioriknown to the decision maker. We assess the effect of adynamicchoice set (new alternatives appear during the decision process) on strategy selection and choice in international politics. We suggest that decision makers use a mixture of decision strategies when making decisions in a two-stage process consisting of an initial screening of available alternatives, and a selection of the best one from the subset of remaining alternatives. To test the effects of dynamic and static choice sets on the decision process we introduce a computer-based "process tracer" in a study of top-ranking officers in the U.S. Air Force. The results show that (1) national security decision makers use a mixture of strategies in arriving at a decision, and (2) strategy selection and choice are significantly influenced by the structure of the choice set (static versus dynamic).