Suchergebnisse

Part I -- Introduction -- Historical Development of Labour Dispute Resolution in Turkey -- Concept of Labour Dispute and Alternative Dispute Resolution -- Part II -- Labour Dispute Resolution and Ways of Prevention of Disputes -- Labour Dispute Resolution within the Enterprise -- Labour Inspection and Prevention of Disputes -- Part III -- Labour Dispute Resolution and Adjudication -- Organization of Labour Courts -- Procedure in Labour Courts -- Part IV -- Alternative Dispute Resolution in Labour Rights Disputes -- Conciliation in Labour Rights Disputes -- Mediation in Labour Rights Disputes -- Arbitration in Labour Rights Disputes -- Part V -- Alternative Dispute Resolution in Collective Interests Disputes -- Mediation in Collective Interests Disputes -- Arbitration in Collective Interests Disputes -- Concluding Remarks

Defence date: 16 December 2014 ; Examining Board: PhD Dennis Patterson, European University Institute (EUI); PhD David Ramos Muñoz, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (External supervisor); PhD Marco Lamandini, Università Di Bologna; PhD Hans-W. Micklitz, European University Institute. ; This PhD thesis explores how the legal infrastructure for dispute resolution in transnational securities transactions can be improved, considering the regulatory and legal limits of the financial sector in each jurisdiction under study (US, Europe and Brazil). The two main objectives of the work are to a) identify the problems that currently exist for a dispute resolution mechanism in the securities area that can be used transnationally and b) propose solutions that can create a safe legal environment that can be used by the investor in case regulatory rules or the terms of the transaction are breached. The work is justified by the fact that financial markets are legal constructions, making legal certainty and the mechanisms available to enforce the terms of a transaction and apply regulatory rules, especially to the investor that is part of the transaction, essential for the own existence of financial markets. Therefore, the existence of transnational financial markets also depends on the existence of a transnational legal infrastructure, at least broad enough to protect the interest of investors. The argument developed through the work is that the creation of a transnational legal infrastructure depends on the type of dispute that is considered, since not only each type of dispute has its own peculiarities, but the national dispute resolution systems are also built based on the type of dispute that will be submitted to it. To create transnational dispute resolution systems for securities transactions, I propose the use of collective mechanisms of dispute resolution based on the initiative of private parties, the use of arbitration and the establishment of cooperation networks among national alternative dispute resolution mechanisms used to solve financial disputes.

Preface -- Urban Community Conflict and Dispute Resolution -- Methodology -- Theories of Conflict Resolution and The Model of Conflict Resolution -- History and Development of Dispute Resolution in China -- Case Analysis—Three Cases in Urban Communities in Shanghai -- State-society Cooperation in Urban Community Dispute Resolution -- The Means and Skills of Mediation and Dispute Resolution -- Conclusion: Making Harmonious Community Work -- Appendix -- Epilogue.

"This edited volume presents research and policy insights into the theory and practice of dispute systems reform in diverse jurisdictions. It highlights how important extra-judicial mechanisms are for resolving cross border disputes, as evidenced both by the breadth of scholarship dedicated to the issue and proliferation of parties resorting to non-litigious dispute resolution mechanisms in recent years. Drawing on selected case studies, the book examines the impact of comparative research and policy analysis in advancing reform of dispute resolution institutions at both the regional and global levels. It explores the challenges and opportunities of understanding and assessing developments in systems of dispute resolution in diverse social and political contexts through comparative research. With growing number of disputes which have come to involve cross-border issues, anyone interested in transnational and comparative dispute resolution will find this book a useful reference"--

Editor --Contributors --List of Abbreviations --Acknowledgment --Introduction --The Deed of Gift (24 October 1887) --The Protocol Governing the 34th America's Cup, Incorporating Amendments 1 through 19 (Consolidated Version 2 September 2013) --Rules of Procedure --Other 34th America's Cup Governing Documents --The 34th America's Cup Jury Decisions --Judicial Decisions.

How viable is the resolution of nuclear non-proliferation disputes through the International Court of Justice and international arbitration? James Fry examines the compromissory clauses in the IAEA Statute, IAEA Safeguards Agreements and the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material that give jurisdiction to these fora and analyses recent jurisprudence to demonstrate how legal resolution can handle such politically sensitive disputes. In sum, legal resolution of nuclear non-proliferation disputes represents an option that States and commentators have all too often ignored. The impartiality and procedural safeguards of legal resolution should make it an acceptable option for target States and the international community, especially vis-à-vis the procedural shortcomings and general heavy-handedness of Security Council involvement under UN Charter Chapter VII