Suchergebnisse

Information and Communication Technology has played a major role in the process of receiving, sending, and storing data, both public data and privacy data in various fields. But unfortunately, the empowerment of Information and Communication Technology related to personal data or privacy is starting to run out of control. Conditions that occur at this time are the emergence of misuse of personal data or violations of privacy so that the impact can be detrimental to the community as a user. This study uses normative legal research methods using a normative juridical approach which is carried out by reviewing and analyzing the rules of international law relating to the privacy of digital information. Based on the research, it was found that privacy is not only protected by law but also includes cultural norms, ethics, and business / professional practices. DIRECTIVE 95/46 / EC and DIRECTIVE 2002/58 / EC provide protection against data and privacy in the digital era and answer a number of important issues related to information confidentiality, treatment of data traffic, spam and cookies. In addition, it also provides guidelines and explanations that the processing of personal data can only be done for relevant and not excessive purposes, for legitimate purposes, as well as ensuring the processing of personal data accurately and up to date.

Four contributions about the EC-Japan relationship. J.-P. Lehman: "Japan and a new world order; implications and an agenda for Europe". (The growth in Japanese influence on the world economy is matched by a potential for even greater influence on the neighbouring Asian countries. The US has made protectionist trade barriers. Europe as a whole can adopt a more enlightened approach to Japan, in political and in traditional trade terms). F. Engering: "The future of economic relations between the EC and Japan". (In particular there are three separate problems in the Japanese trade relations with the European Community: rapidly growing Japanese trade surplus; explosively growing Japanese market-shares within a number of strategically important sectors of European industry; difficult access to the Japanese market). A. Morita: "Destructive business attitudes". Y. Kashiwagi: "Japan as a major creditor country and her relations with Europe". (Kashiwagi's opinion about the ongoing global economic evolution, in which Japan, as he is convinced, plays a unique role). (EVD)

Budgetary conflict between the European Council and Parliament.

THERE ARE 518 MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT(MEPs). Each of the twelve member states of the EuropeanCommunity (EC) has a specific number of MEPs, based onpopulation. As one of the larger member states, the UnitedKingdom, along with France, Germany, and Italy, has 81repre sent at ives.European Parliament (EP) elections are held every five yearsfor a fixed term. The Parliament is organized into blocs ofrepresentatives, which, in the traditional manner of multi-partyparliaments, span the ideological spectrum from left to right.There are continual adjustments in these coalitions, but generallythe 5 18 MEPs are divided into approximately ten groupings. The EP holds its plenary sessions in Strasbourg, and itsSecretariat is in Luxembourg. However, most of its substantivedeliberations are done by committees, which hold their sessions inBrussels. This, together with the ease of commuting andinherently greater appeal of Brussels, has made the Belgiancapital the usual reference point for the European Parliament,although the EP continues to have something akin to ageographical split personality.

SEVERAL REASONS EXPLAIN THE LOW INTEREST IN THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS IN THE FRG. FIRST, THE VOTER WAS NOT DECIDING ABOUT THE FORMATION OF A GOVERNMENT AND THE (RE)DISTRIBUTION OF POLITICAL POWER. SECOND, IT WAS NOT A DECISION ABOUT TOP RANKING POLITICAL LEADERS AS IN NATIONAL ELECTIONS WHERE PERSONALITIES COMPETE FOR THE POSITION OF CHANCELLOR OF (AT LAND LEVEL) PRIME MINISTER; EXPERIENCE SHOWS THAT THE PERSONALITY FACTOR HAS A MOBILIZING EFFECT. THIRD, THE HIGHLY COMPLICATED SUBSTANCE OF EC POLITICS HAS A DEMOBILIZING EFFECT. FOURTH, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT WAS REGARDED AS AN INSTITUTION WITH VERY LIMITED POWERS AND ONLY MARGINAL POLITICAL INFLUENCE. IN ADDITION, THE GREAT MAJORITY (70 AND 73 PER CENT)2 FELT INSUFFICIENTLY INFORMED ABOUT THE EP AND UNBLE TO COME TO AN ADEQUATE JUDGEMENT ON ITS ACTIVITIES. FIFTH, THE PERFORMANCE OF THE EC AS A WHOLE HAD BEEN FELT TO BE POOR AND DISAPPOINTING: ONLY 13 PER CENT COULD IDENTIFY SOME PROGRESS SINCE 1979 AGAINST ONE THIRD WHO COULD ONLY SEE SETBACKS.3