Suchergebnisse

[ES] El presente Trabajo Fin de Máster tiene como objetivo analizar el área de Gestión de riesgos de la dirección de proyectos considerando y comparando los principales estándares y metodologías para la Dirección y Gestión de Proyectos, como son el Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) del Project Management Institute, PRojects IN Controlled Environments 2 (PRINCE2) de la Office of Government Commerce (OGC-UK), el Open Project Management Methodology (PM2) de la Comisión Europea, la Individual Competence Baseline (ICB 4) de la International Project Management Association (IPMA) y Project Risk Analysis and Management (PRAM) de la Association for Project Management (APM-UK) Para ello se hará una revisión bibliográfica de los marcos de referencia anteriormente mencionados, centrando la atención en los procesos de gestión de riesgos, analizando las etapas de dichos procesos, las herramientas de análisis de riesgo y las estrategias de gestión de riesgo propuestas. Tras la revisión teórica es necesario realizar una comparación de la aplicación de estos enfoques. Para ello se ha decidido elegir como caso de estudio un proyecto del que se dispusiera abundante información y de envergadura suficiente para sufrir riesgos de diferente origen y tipología, seleccionando el Proyecto de Diseño y Construcción del Tercer Juego de Esclusas, perteneciente al Programa de Ampliación del Canal de Panamá. Por tanto, se ha realizado un plan de gestión del riesgo para dicho proyecto, utilizando los diferentes estándares y metodologías considerados y seguidamente se ha elaborado como conclusión un análisis comparativo de las analogías y diferencias, beneficios, carencias y limitaciones de cada uno de los enfoques. ; [EN] The main goal of the current thesis is to analyse the Risk Management of Project Management considering and comparing the main standards and methodologies in Project Management, such as Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) by Project Management Institute, PRojects IN Controlled Environments 2 (PRINCE2) by ...

Social history of East Bengal (now Bangladesh), 1857-1905

The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].

The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].

The twentieth century is an era of pervasive turmoil. There were two cataclysmic full-scale wars and many wars and conflicts of lesser importance in all parts of the world. The term crisis is among the most widely used verbal symbols of turmoil in politics among nations. Scholars and journalists, too, often write about such things as incidents, disputes, riots, and rebellions etc. as crisis. In short, crisis is a pervasive term to describe dis ruption and disorder in the global arena. Many political scientists have been researching this phenomenon of international system but there is still a need for new researches and analysis of crisis in world politics. New technological tools and data-sets enable further development of analytical aspects of crisis theory: eruption of conflictual situations, context and reasons of crisis escalation and de-escalation, decision making process etc. The main reason impelled to write this article is the lack of integral theory on crisis issues. That is why the main objective of this study is to make a quantitative and comparative research of the crisis in the 20th century in order to highlight the main influential factors of this process in different time and space dimensions. A quantitative and comparative analysis in this article was performed using International Crisis Behavior (ICB) data-set of international crisis (by the SPSS 12.0 package). The results of the research confirm the presumption that the analysis of different "levels" provides different outcomes.[.].

"International Crises Interrogated: Modeling the Escalation Process with Quantitative Methods" published on by Oxford University Press.

Interpersonal citizenship behavior (ICB) in organizations is an inherently relational and multilevel phenomenon. Using a multilevel framework, this study investigates the different levels of social network antecedents of ICBs. Specifically, the authors examine the effects of individual-level network characteristics (centrality and transitivity) and group-level network properties (density and centralization) on individuals' ICBs. From a sample of 846 individuals in 149 work groups, the authors find that individual centrality and the network density of a group increased group members' ICBs and note the positive joint effect of both predictors. Furthermore, consistent with their prediction, the tendency for individuals embedded in a local triad to display less ICB is greater in the decentralized group. This result shows a possible trade-off between structural positions in local and global networks in facilitating individuals' ICBs.

Die Nachfrage nach mobil erbrachten Gesundheitsdienstleistungen steigt an. Dabei ist IT-Unterstützung verfügbar, Dienstleistungsorganisationen in der Domäne müssen aber mit knappen Budgets und einem Engpass an Fachkräften zurechtkommen. Gleichzeitig wird eine hohe Servicequalität vorausgesetzt. Es sind Hilfestellungen nötig, damit die Dienstleister die Versorgung hochwertig gestalten können. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird hierzu ein Bezugsrahmen entwickelt, der die konfigurative Gestaltung entsprechender Geschäftsmodelle unterstützt.

In Information Systems, enterprise modelling has been a pivotal field of research that has evolved over a period of more than 20 years. In recent years, the main research focus was on adapting approaches to enterprise modelling to changing requirements, e.g. provide support for IT management. To develop a better understanding of the motivation, objectives and concepts that are characteristic for enterprise modelling, it is important to study the terminological background. On the one hand, it builds the foundation for the conceptualisation of enterprise models, on the other hand, it helps to clarify the semantic relation of the term "enterprise model" to terms in its surroundings such as "information system", "conceptual model" etc. This report is aimed at developing conceptualisations of respective terms. Starting with more generic terms like "domain", "model" or "information system", the course of the investigation gradually moves forward to "conceptual model", "action system", and "enterprise model". Finally, an elaborate conception of multi-perspective enterprise models is presented that is intended to characteristic aspects of their structure, the intentions related to them and preconditions of their reflective use.

An enterprise model comprises various abstractions of an enterprise that represent both information systems and the surrounding action systems. These different models are integrated in order to avoid redundant work and to contribute to a tight and consistent integration of action systems and information systems. For this purpose, the method MEMO (Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling) features a family of modelling languages, each of which is aimed at representing specific perspectives and aspects of an enterprise. Within the MEMO languages, the Organisation Modelling Language (MEMO OrgML) is of outstanding relevance. It allows for creating elaborate models of business process types (organisational dynamics) and of organisation structures. Therefore, it is a key instrument for analysing and (re-) designing a company's action system, i.e. its key patterns of division of labour and coordination with respect to organisational goals. This report is intended to prepare for a major revision of the MEMO OrgML. Therefore, its focus on terminological foundations and on the comprehensive analysis of requirements related to the design of organisation modelling languages. The analysis was guided by a method for developing domain-specific modelling languages. It suggests focussing on use scenarios to analyse and refine requirements. The analysis is differentiated into general requirements for DSML and general as well as specific requirements for organisation modelling languages. The results are presented in an extensive dictionary of almost 70 requirements on different levels of abstraction.