European Law and National Constitutions
In: Deutsch-Norwegisches Forum des Rechts v.11
Foreword -- Contents -- Thomas Giegerich | European Integration v. the Inalienable Core of German Statehood -- 1. The Traditional Political Finality of European Integration -- 2. The Current Crisis of the European Integration Project -- 3. Recent Proposals for Deepening the European Integration as a Way Out of the Crisis -- 4. The Irreconcilability of Rationality and Political Psychology in EU Affairs -- a) How to Improve the Democratic Accountability of the EU -- b) How to Reduce the Size of the Commission -- c) How to Determine the Seat of the European Parliament -- 5. The German Federal Constitutional Court's List of Non-Transferrable State Competences -- 6. The Gate-keeping Function of the German Federal Constitutional Court with Regard to the European Integration Process -- a) The Federal Constitutional Court Permits Every Voter to Lodgea Complaint against Treaty Revisions -- b) How Would the European Court of Human Rights Decide onAnalogous Applications by Individual Voters? -- 7. National Fundamental Rights Protection as an Inalienable National Policy Domain -- a) The Åkerberg Fransson Opinion of the Court of Justice of the EU and the Reaction of the Federal Constitutional Court -- b) Should the EU Have More Power to Monitor the Member States' Human Rights Record? -- 8. Is there a Uniform Approach in the Member States withregard to Inalienable National Policy Domains? -- 9. The Equilibrium Concept for a More PerfectEuropean Union -- Eirik Holmøyvik | Europe and Norwegian constitutionalism 1814 -2014: From the relationship between Parliament and King to the EEA -- 1. Introduction -- 2. The Norwegian constitution of 1814 and its Europeancontext -- 2.1. The European context -- 2.2. The Norwegian 1814 constitution -- 3. 1814 -1884: Constitutional struggles -- 3.1. Constitutional developments in post 1814 Europe