The Political, Cultural, and Social Views of Yugoslav Youth
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 87
ISSN: 1537-5331
1804808 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 29, Heft 1, S. 87
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Kierkegaard research Volume 14
Giorgio Agamben : state of exception / Leif Bork Hansen -- Hannah Arendt : religion, politics and the influence of Kierkegaard / Marcio Gimenes de Paula -- Alain Badiou : thinking the subject after the death of God / Michael O' Neill Burns -- Judith butler : Kierkegaard as her early teacher in rhetoric and parody / Gerhard Thonhauser -- Jürgen Habermas : social selfhood, religion, and Kierkegaard / J. Michael Tilley -- Martin Luther King, Jr. : Kierkegaard's Works of love, King's Strength to love / Nigel Hatton -- Gyárgy Lukács : from a tragic love story to a tragic life story / András Nagy -- Herbert Marcuse : social critique, Haecker, and Kierkegaardian individualism / J. Michael Tilley -- José Ortega y Gasset : meditations on "provincial romanticism" / Robert Puchniak -- Jean-Paul Sartre : between Kierkegaard and Marx / Michael O'Neill Burns -- Carl Schmitt : zones of exception and appropriation / Bartholomew Ryan -- Eric Voegelin : politics, history, and the anxiety of existence / Peter Brickey LeQuire -- Cornel West : Kierkegaard and the construction of a "blues philosophy" / Marcia C. Robinson -- Richard Wright : Kierkegaard's Influence as existentialist outsider / Jennifer Elisa Veninga.
In: Studies in philosophy
The critique of mechanism in the political philosophy of Herder and German romanticism -- The political function of machine metaphors in Hegel's early writings -- Mechanism in religious practice -- The mechanization of labor and the birth of modern ethicality in Hegel's Jena political writings -- Mechanism and the problem of self-determination in Hegel's logic -- The modern state as absolute mechanism : Hegel's logical insight into the relation of civil society and the state
In: Routledge studies in social and political thought
In: Abandoning Historical Conflict?, S. 45-68
In: Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History, Band 67, Heft 1, S. 44-61
ISSN: 2541-9390
The purpose of the article is to analyze the social and political views of Alexey Filippov during the years of his cooperation with the Russian National Democrats. It reveals the achievements and gaps in the historiography of Filippov's ideological biography. Considerable attention is paid to the formation of the thinker's original views on the construction of the greatness of Russia by the hands of non-Russians. The reasons for the unpopularity of Filippov's "progressive nationalism" and the conditions of his activity in St Petersburg since 1912 are considered. The article analyzes the collaboration of Filippov with Alexander Gariazin; the chronology and circumstances of their publication of the weekly "Dym Otechestva" and the monthly "Zhurnal Dlia Vsekh" ("The Journal for All"). Filippov's sharp criticism of the leaders of the right-wing parties in Russia, the aristocracy, the ruling dynasty, ministers, the Holy Synod is emphasized. His loyalty to the monarchy as a form of government, and personally to Nicholas II, as well as the loyalty of other National Democrats, which they tried to use in confrontation with the All-Russian National Union and the Union of the Russian People, is pointed out. The positions of Filippov and his associates on Russian foreign policy, the reasons for their calls for the immediate war against Germany and Austria-Hungary are demonstrated. It is concluded that behind the eclecticism of Filippov's views was hidden his sincere conviction in the necessity of combining democracy, rights and freedoms with strong imperial power and national patriotism. The article demonstrates the continuity of Filippov's views throughout his life, including the Soviet period.
The article covers the political and legal views of Taras Shevchenko on national oppression elimination and establishment of the state independence of the Ukrainian people, and Shevchenko's call for a struggle for national and social liberation, the abolition of serfdom, social equality and political freedomSlavic federation, independent state, social and national equality.
BASE
In: Mind Association occasional series
Interest in the contribution made by women to the history of philosophy is burgeoning. At the forefront of this revival is Mary Wollstonecraft. This volume brings together essays from leading scholars, which explore Wollstonecraft's range as a moral and political philosopher of note, both taking a historical perspective and applying her thinking to current academic debates
In: Great thinkers in economics
This book explores the life and work of Austrian-British economist, political economist, and social philosopher, Friedrich Hayek. Set within a context of the recent financial crisis, alongside the renewed interest in Hayek and the Hayek-Keynes debate, the book introduces the main themes of Hayek's thought. These include the division of knowledge, the importance of rules, the problems with planning and economic management, and the role of constitutional constraints in enabling the emergence of unplanned order in the market by limiting the perverse incentives and distortions in information often associated with political discretion. Key to understanding Hayek's development as a thinker is his emphasis on the knowledge problem that economic decision makers face and how alternative institutional arrangements either hinder or assist them in overcoming that epistemic dilemma. Hayek saw order emerging from individual action and responsibility under the appropriate institutional order that itself emerges from actors discovering new and better ways to coordinate their behavior. This book will be of interest to all those keen to gain a deeper understanding of this great 20th century thinker in economics. Peter Boettke is University Professor of Economics and Philosophy, Director of the F.A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, at George Mason University, USA.--
In: Extremism and democracy
"Julius Evolas writing covered a vast range of subjects, from a distinctive and categorical ideological outlook and has been extremely influential on a significant number of extreme right thinkers, activists and organisations. This book is the first full length study in English to present his political thought to a wider audience, beyond that of his followers and sympathisers, and to bring into the open the study of a neglected strand of contemporary Western thought, that of traditionalism. Evola deserves more attention because he is an influential writer. His following comes from an important if largely ignored political movement: activists and commentators whose political positions are, like his, avowedly traditionalist, authoritarian, anti-modern, anti-democratic and anti-liberal. With honourable exceptions, contemporary academic study tends to treat these groups as a minority within a minority, a sub-species of Fascism, from whom they are held to derive their ideas and their support. This work seeks to bring out more clearly the complexity of Evolas post-war strategy, so as to explain how he can be adopted both by the neo-fascist groups committed to violence, and by groups such as the European New Right whose approach is more aimed at influence from within liberal democracies. Furlong also recognises the relevance of Evolas ideas to anti-globalisation arguments, including a re-examination of his arguments for detachment and spontaneism (apolitia)"--
We elicit distributional fairness ideals of impartial spectators using an incentivized experiment in a large and heterogeneous sample of the German population. We document several empirical facts: (i) egalitarianism is more popular than efficiency- and maxi-min ideals; (ii) females are more egalitarian than men; (iii) men are relatively more efficiency minded; (iv) left-leaning voters are more likely to be egalitarians, whereas right-leaning voters are more likely to be efficiency-minded; and (v) young and high-educated participants hold different fairness ideals than the rest of the population. Moreover, we show that fairness ideals predict preferences for redistribution and intervention by the government, as well as actual charitable giving, even after controlling for a range of covariates. This paper thus contributes to our understanding of the underpinnings of voting behavior and ideological preferences and to the literature that links laboratory measures and field behavior.
BASE