Suchergebnisse

Rancière's work on education is becoming widely known, but it must be understood in its context to avoid any misleadingly conventional readings and to grasp its general importance. The work on industrial history is obviously connected, but so are the more technical academic criticisms of Althusser, Bourdieu and Marx. These add considerably to conventional discussion by identifying a crucial contradiction between emancipatory goals and necessary hierarchies based on expertise. Rancière's work on aesthetics as a democratic arena has inspired some recent educational experiments in participation. His historical research can also be seen as providing support for current educational struggles against neoliberalism. Rancière's methods are assessed critically in turn, and the connections with Foucault can be seen to both unify the work overall and raise difficulties of its own.

In the following essay we offer an interpretation of Rancière's thought. We do this in three steps: at first we sustain the systematic character of Rancière's esthetic philosophy in particular and of his philosophy in general. We then locate the genesis of this theory within the discussion with the politicization of art. To end with the truly political reading that follows from Rancière's philosophy. ; En el presente ensayo ofrecemos una interpretación del pensamiento de Rancière. Ésta se vertebra en tres momentos: en primer lugar sostenemos la hipótesis del carácter sistemático de la teoría estética en particular, y de su filosofía en general. En un segundo momento situamos la génesis de esta teoría en la discusión con la teoría de la politización del arte. Para, en un tercer momento, abordar la lectura propiamente política que se desprende de la filosofía de Rancière.

En el presente ensayo ofrecemos una interpretación del pensamiento de Rancière. Ésta se vertebra en tres momentos: en primer lugar sostenemos la hipótesis del carácter sistemático de la teoría estética en particular, y de su filosofía en general. En un segundo momento situamos la génesis de esta teoría en la discusión con la teoría de la politización del arte. Para, en un tercer momento, abordar la lectura propiamente política que se desprende de la filosofía de Rancière. ; In the following essay we offer an interpretation of Rancière's thought. We do this in three steps: at first we sustain the systematic character of Rancière's esthetic philosophy in particular and of his philosophy in general. We then locate the genesis of this theory within the discussion with the politicization of art. To end with the truly political reading that follows from Rancière's philosophy.

Es handelt sich bei dem vorliegenden Buch um die erste umfassende Einführung zu Rancières ästhetischem Denken und seiner Relevanz für die Kunstpraxis. Jacques Rancière hat die Frage der Gleichheit in den Mittelpunkt der Kunstbetrachtung gestellt und damit international gerade an Kunsthochschulen Furore gemacht. Volkmar Mühleis widmet sich eingehend Rancières ästhetischem Denken und befragt es erstmals kritisch im Rahmen der Kunstpraxis. Dabei zeigt sich zum einen die besondere Qualität von Rancières Ansatz für den Kunstdiskurs – der stets die Freiheit, aber kaum ihre Bedingung, die Gleichheit, verhandelte –, zum andern aber auch seine Schwächen. So operiert Rancière mit einem medialen Begriff, der kaum den Anforderungen technologischer Kritik heutzutage standhält. Wenn er ästhetische Erfahrung in Anspruch nimmt, ohne zu klären, was Erfahrung hier im Einzelnen heißt, so verbleibt er seinem emanzipatorischen Gedankengut nach in einer rationalistischen Tradition. Mit Blick auf die Schriften von Bernard Stiegler, Bernhard Waldenfels und Käte Meyer-Drawe zeigt Volkmar Mühleis, wie diese besondere Qualität von Rancières ästhetischem Denken auf ganz andere Art die gegenwärtige Debatte bereichern kann.

Dieser Sammelband diskutiert aus einer politiktheoretischen Perspektive das Denken Jacques Rancières. Dabei widmen sich die Beiträge insbesondere dem Verhältnis von Demokratie, Herrschaft und Staatlichkeit. Aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven identifizieren und erörtern sie zunächst zentrale theoretische Konzepte. Im Anschluss wird Rancières Denken über einen Vergleich mit anderen herrschafts- und staatskritischen Denker*innen des Politischen in einen dissensuellen Zwischenraum versetzt, um Verbindungslinien, Spannungen und Konvergenzen zwischen Rancières politischer Theorie und anderen demokratie- und politiktheoretischen Arbeiten des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts herauszuarbeiten. Die Beiträge des Bandes konzentrieren sich hier auf messianische, republikanische, poststrukturalistische und deliberative Ansätze. In einem letzten Zugang unterziehen die Beiträge Rancières politisches Denken einer kritischen Lektüre durch queer-feministische, postkoloniale und anarchistische Theoretisierungen, um Leerstellen auszuleuchten und damit mit Rancière gegen Rancière zu denken. Mit Beiträgen von Marvin Dreiwes, Matthias Flatscher, Mareike Gebhardt, Johannes Haaf, Anastasiya Kasko, Alexander Kurunczi, Christian Leonhardt, Thomas Linpinsel, Niklas Plätzer, Kenneth Rösen, Luca Sagnotti, Sergej Seitz, Anna-Terese Steffner de Marco und Carolin Zieringer.

In the framework of the complicities that can be identified in different fields between Foucault´s and Rancière's works, the present analysis reviews more particularly the way in which both authors approach the links between subjectivity and politics ; En el marco de las complicidades que en distintos ámbitos se pueden identificar entre las obras de Foucault y Rancière, el presente análisis revisa más particularmente el modo cómo ambos autores abordan los vínculos entre subjetividad y política.

Çağdaş siyaset felsefesinin temel tartışma alanlarından biri "radikal demokrasi" kavramıdır. Bu yaklaşımın temsilcisi sayılan isimler arasında belli müştereklikler olmasına karşın ciddi farklılıklar da vardır. Ne var ki, özellikle iki kuramcının düşünsel verimleri arasındaki benzerlikler bir hayli dikkat çekicidir: Jacques Rancière ve Sheldon S. Wolin. İki isim de, sahih siyasal ilişkinin mevcut siyaset düzenini sekteye uğratması gerektiğini; demokrasinin yalnızca hukuki-politik bir biçimden ibaret olmadığını ileri sürmüştür. Ayrıca her ikisi de siyasetin öznesini "demos" kavramı çerçevesinde tartışmaktadır. Düşünsel hatları oldukça benzeyen ama birbirinin çalışmalarına hiç referans vermemiş bu iki düşünür arasındaki benzerlikler hayli çarpıcıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, iki kuramcının görüşlerini özetleyerek paralelliklere dikkat çekmek ve nasıl benzer kavramsal tertibatlara yaslanarak düşündüklerini gözler önüne sermektir.

12 The Actuality of The Ignorant Schoolmaster -- With Andrea Benvenuto, Laurence Cornu and Patrice Vermeren Le Télémaque, 2005 -- 13 Losing Too Is Still Ours: An Interview about the Thwarted Politics of Literature -- With Martin Jalbert Cahiers littéraires Contre-jour, 2005 -- 14 The Indecisive Affect -- With Patrice Blouin, Élie During and Dork Zabunyan Critique, 2005 -- 15 The New Anti-Democratic Discourse -- With Amador Fernández-Savater Archipélago, 2006 -- 16 Art of the Possible -- With Fulvia Carnevale and John Kelsey Artforum, 2007 -- 17 Another Type of Universality

Summary: In the context of the complications that can be identified in different areas between the works of Foucault and Rancière, this analysis reviews more particularly how the two authors deal with the links between subjectivity and politics. ; Resumen: En el marco de las complicidades que en distintos ámbitos se pueden identificar entre las obras de Foucault y Rancière, el presente análisis revisa más particularmente el modo cómo ambos autores abordan los vínculos entre subjetividad y política.

<p>Rancière's work on education is becoming widely known, but it must be understood in its context to avoid any misleadingly conventional readings and to grasp its general importance. The work on industrial history is obviously connected, but so are the more technical academic criticisms of Althusser, Bourdieu and Marx. These add considerably to conventional discussion by identifying a crucial contradiction between emancipatory goals and necessary hierarchies based on expertise.</p><p> </p><p>Rancière's work on aesthetics as a democratic arena has inspired some recent educational experiments in participation. His historical research can also be seen as providing support for current educational struggles against neoliberalism.</p><p> </p><p>Rancière's methods are assessed critically in turn, and the connections with Foucault can be seen to both unify the work overall and raise difficulties of its own.</p>

now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; 91 109 26 ; now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; Senia ; now discusses the chronic nature of my particular fragmented and unfinished path by Rancière's work, which I will organise on the basis of some of the images which, in my view, play an important role in his argument. I hope that this image album and the skewed speech from them can be useful for the discussion of the sense or political use of the images and, more generally, for the discussion of aesthetic/political relations. Clella Lacasa, M. (2011). The image policy in Jacques Rancière. RES Publica. 26: 91-109. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/51312 ; Someto hoy a discusión la crónica de mi particular recorrido fragmentario e inacabado por la obra de Rancière, que organizaré a partir algunas de las imágenes que, en mi opinión, juegan un papel importante en su argumenta ción. Espero que este álbum de imágenes y el discurso tramado a partir de ellas puedan ser de alguna utilidad para el debate acerca del sentido ...

A partir de un recorrido por las imágenes que han jugado un papel relevante en la obra de J. Rancière y, en particular, de un grupo de imágenes en que se representa el rostro o el cuerpo de la mujer, se establece una comparación entre las estéticas de J. Rancière y J. F. Lyotard. Recurriendo al estudio sobre la imaginación apocalíptica de M. Jay y a las críticas de Rancière a la concepción apocalíptica del tiempo se contraponen dos imágenes enfrentadas de una misma figura femenina desdoblada. Estas dos visiones del cuerpo de la mujer, dos versiones de la figura-madre, corresponden a dos concepciones distintas de la política de las imágenes. ; Taking as a starting point the images that have played an outstanding role in J. Rancière's work, especially in a group of images where the woman's face or body is portrayed, a comparison is drawn between the aesthetics of J. Rancière and J. F. Lyotard. If we turn to M. Jay's study about apocalyptic imagination and Rancière's critique to the apocalyptic concept of time, we find that two images in conflict of the same split female figure are opposed. These two visions of the woman's body, two versions of the mother figure, correspond to two different concepts of the politics of image.