Suchergebnisse

Метою цієї статті є дослідження розвитку козакознавчих студій у Миколаєві та Херсоні наприкінці ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст. Дослідження козацької історії у загалом провінційних за своїм економічним та культурним потенціалом, порівняно з Одесою, Миколаєві та Херсоні були одним з основних (поряд з антикознавством (Ольвія, скіфські кургани), дослідження історії цих міст з кінця ХVIII – у ХІХ ст.) струменем місцевої історіографії, що дозволяв їй привертати увагу представників інших центрів, бути активними учасниками історіографічного процесу на півдні України, а іноді і ширше. Важливим чинником розвитку козакознавства був інтерес до цієї теми з боку аматорів історії, що, розуміючи історичне значення документальних та археологічних артефактів допомагали історикам опрацьовувати та зберігати ці джерела. ; Целью этой статьи является исследование развития козакознавчих исследований в Николаеве и Херсоне в конце XIX – начале ХХ в. Исследование казацкой истории в целом провинциальных по своему экономическому и культурным потенциалом по сравнению с Одессой, Николаеве и Херсоне были одним из основных (наряду с антиковедении (Ольвия, скифские курганы), исследование истории этих городов с конца XVIII – XIX в. – основа местной историографии, позволяла ей привлекать внимание представителей других центров, быть активными участниками историографического процесса на юге Украины, а иногда и шире. Важным фактором развития казаковедения был интерес к этой теме со стороны любителей истории, которые, понимая историческое значение документальных и археологических артефактов помогали историкам обрабатывать и хранить эти источники. ; The main center of historical research in the territory of Southern Ukraine in the XIX and XX centuries. Odesa was the largest socio-economic and cultural center in the region. Therefore, most historiographers mainly studied how the historiography developed at the Novorossiysky University, leading Odesa societies. But important historiographic phenomena were also in other southern Ukrainian centers. The development of historiography in the territory between the Bug and the Dnieper, the main cities of these lands, Kherson and Mykolayiv should be studied better. Although these territories are known to have been one of the historical centers for the development of the Ukrainian Cossacks, in particular Kamyanska and Oleshkivska Sich, and the Bug Cossack Army.The purpose of this article is to study the history of the Cossacks in these centers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, to trace their connections, and to accept their views. The relevance of this approach is evidenced by the availability of articles on the study of the Cossacks in certain regional branches of historical science. Some aspects have already attracted the attention of researchers whose works are taken into account as a historiographic basis of this article. The source-documentary base of our article is, first of all, the works of Mykolayiv and Kherson cossacks, newspaper publications, memoirs.The first history of the Cossacks in Mykolayiv was studied by M. Kiryakov, in Kherson - O. Rusov. Both paid attention to the fact that the Cossacks carried out military and maritime campaigns, and the Kherson author made an important accent on the fact that historians should pay much attention to the Turkish and Tatar historical sources. In the 1890s in Mykolayiv studied the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks, a student of V. B. Antonovich P. A. Ivanov In the magazine «Kievskaya starina» in 1891 year. P. A. Ivanov published documents from the archives of the Nicholas Military Governor's Office on the resettlement of Cossacks to Taman.A great contribution to the collection and research of the Cossack heritage was made by the employees of the Natural History-Historical (Historical-Archaeological) Museum S.I. Gaiduchenko F. T. Kaminsky In the work "History of Ukraine-Rus", the head of the Ukrainian society "Prosvita" Mykolayiv M. M. Arkas paid much attention to the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks. He accepted the populist version that the Cossacks emerged from the fugitives who escaped the Polish order, in the hope of starting a new life, free and equal. He described the Ukrainian people who went to the Cossacks as vicarious people, conquerors who attacked and robbed Tatars, Turks, Muscovites, Poles, Lithuanians and their own, Ukrainian, Masters. The device of Zaporozhian Sich reminded the author of West European knight orders. M. M. Arkas believed the uprising of 1648 was popular. Separate section M. M. Arkas devoted to the last years of Sich's existence and its liquidation. The description of the liquidation of the Sich draws attention to the sharp opposition between Russians and Zaporozhians. The historian paid much attention to the fate of the Cossacks after the liquidation, until the Crimean War. Many images of the Cossacks were in the illustrations to the book. Reviewers of the book М. М. Arkas basically believed that he well described the history of the Cossacks.Chief historian in Kherson in the late ХІХ nineteenth and early ХХ centuries. was a student of V. B. Antonovych Viktor Ivanovych Goshkevych, founder and director of the Kherson Museum. In 1903 year the researcher published a book on treasures and the search for treasures in the Kherson region. In the book, in an interesting way, he combined stories about the findings of Cossack subjects and legends about the Cossack treasures. In the department of history of the Cossacks V.I. Goshkevych conducted excursions in the Ukrainian language. The museum was constantly replenished with items from the history of the Cossacks. V. I. Goshkevych conducted excavations on the territories of Kamenska, Oleshkivska and Chortomlytskaya Sich.It is concluded that the research of Cossack history in Mykolayiv and Kherson was one of the main directions of local historiography. This allowed local historians to draw attention to their research by representatives of other centers, to be active participants in the historiographical process in the south of Ukraine, and sometimes also outside its borders. An important factor in the development of Cossack was the interest in this topic from the side of the lovers of history. They understood the historical significance of documentary and archaeological artifacts that helped historians, first of all, V. I. Goshkevych, to process and store these sources.

Метою цієї статті є дослідження розвитку козакознавчих студій у Миколаєві та Херсоні наприкінці ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст. Дослідження козацької історії у загалом провінційних за своїм економічним та культурним потенціалом, порівняно з Одесою, Миколаєві та Херсоні були одним з основних (поряд з антикознавством (Ольвія, скіфські кургани), дослідження історії цих міст з кінця ХVIII – у ХІХ ст.) струменем місцевої історіографії, що дозволяв їй привертати увагу представників інших центрів, бути активними учасниками історіографічного процесу на півдні України, а іноді і ширше. Важливим чинником розвитку козакознавства був інтерес до цієї теми з боку аматорів історії, що, розуміючи історичне значення документальних та археологічних артефактів допомагали історикам опрацьовувати та зберігати ці джерела. ; Целью этой статьи является исследование развития козакознавчих исследований в Николаеве и Херсоне в конце XIX – начале ХХ в. Исследование казацкой истории в целом провинциальных по своему экономическому и культурным потенциалом по сравнению с Одессой, Николаеве и Херсоне были одним из основных (наряду с антиковедении (Ольвия, скифские курганы), исследование истории этих городов с конца XVIII – XIX в. – основа местной историографии, позволяла ей привлекать внимание представителей других центров, быть активными участниками историографического процесса на юге Украины, а иногда и шире. Важным фактором развития казаковедения был интерес к этой теме со стороны любителей истории, которые, понимая историческое значение документальных и археологических артефактов помогали историкам обрабатывать и хранить эти источники. ; The main center of historical research in the territory of Southern Ukraine in the XIX and XX centuries. Odesa was the largest socio-economic and cultural center in the region. Therefore, most historiographers mainly studied how the historiography developed at the Novorossiysky University, leading Odesa societies. But important historiographic phenomena were also in other southern Ukrainian centers. The development of historiography in the territory between the Bug and the Dnieper, the main cities of these lands, Kherson and Mykolayiv should be studied better. Although these territories are known to have been one of the historical centers for the development of the Ukrainian Cossacks, in particular Kamyanska and Oleshkivska Sich, and the Bug Cossack Army.The purpose of this article is to study the history of the Cossacks in these centers in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, to trace their connections, and to accept their views. The relevance of this approach is evidenced by the availability of articles on the study of the Cossacks in certain regional branches of historical science. Some aspects have already attracted the attention of researchers whose works are taken into account as a historiographic basis of this article. The source-documentary base of our article is, first of all, the works of Mykolayiv and Kherson cossacks, newspaper publications, memoirs.The first history of the Cossacks in Mykolayiv was studied by M. Kiryakov, in Kherson - O. Rusov. Both paid attention to the fact that the Cossacks carried out military and maritime campaigns, and the Kherson author made an important accent on the fact that historians should pay much attention to the Turkish and Tatar historical sources. In the 1890s in Mykolayiv studied the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks, a student of V. B. Antonovich P. A. Ivanov In the magazine «Kievskaya starina» in 1891 year. P. A. Ivanov published documents from the archives of the Nicholas Military Governor's Office on the resettlement of Cossacks to Taman.A great contribution to the collection and research of the Cossack heritage was made by the employees of the Natural History-Historical (Historical-Archaeological) Museum S.I. Gaiduchenko F. T. Kaminsky In the work "History of Ukraine-Rus", the head of the Ukrainian society "Prosvita" Mykolayiv M. M. Arkas paid much attention to the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks. He accepted the populist version that the Cossacks emerged from the fugitives who escaped the Polish order, in the hope of starting a new life, free and equal. He described the Ukrainian people who went to the Cossacks as vicarious people, conquerors who attacked and robbed Tatars, Turks, Muscovites, Poles, Lithuanians and their own, Ukrainian, Masters. The device of Zaporozhian Sich reminded the author of West European knight orders. M. M. Arkas believed the uprising of 1648 was popular. Separate section M. M. Arkas devoted to the last years of Sich's existence and its liquidation. The description of the liquidation of the Sich draws attention to the sharp opposition between Russians and Zaporozhians. The historian paid much attention to the fate of the Cossacks after the liquidation, until the Crimean War. Many images of the Cossacks were in the illustrations to the book. Reviewers of the book М. М. Arkas basically believed that he well described the history of the Cossacks.Chief historian in Kherson in the late ХІХ nineteenth and early ХХ centuries. was a student of V. B. Antonovych Viktor Ivanovych Goshkevych, founder and director of the Kherson Museum. In 1903 year the researcher published a book on treasures and the search for treasures in the Kherson region. In the book, in an interesting way, he combined stories about the findings of Cossack subjects and legends about the Cossack treasures. In the department of history of the Cossacks V.I. Goshkevych conducted excursions in the Ukrainian language. The museum was constantly replenished with items from the history of the Cossacks. V. I. Goshkevych conducted excavations on the territories of Kamenska, Oleshkivska and Chortomlytskaya Sich.It is concluded that the research of Cossack history in Mykolayiv and Kherson was one of the main directions of local historiography. This allowed local historians to draw attention to their research by representatives of other centers, to be active participants in the historiographical process in the south of Ukraine, and sometimes also outside its borders. An important factor in the development of Cossack was the interest in this topic from the side of the lovers of history. They understood the historical significance of documentary and archaeological artifacts that helped historians, first of all, V. I. Goshkevych, to process and store these sources.

The aim of the article is to study the place of representatives of the Cossack class students and teachers of the Odesa Novorossiys'k university. Established the number and composition of the students of the cossacks, their origin from different cossack communities: ukrainian and russian cossacks. Traced the fate of the outstanding personalities.Novorosiys'k university was one of the universities that they were few in the Russian Empire. So he included the representatives not only of different ethnic and social groups, but also geographically diverse. This led to stay among teachers and students from different families Cossacks. In 1905-1907 years Cossack myth in its Russian version used Odesa Russian chauvinists, some of which could really be a Cossack (Don, etc.) origin and be besides associated with the University.Cossack ancestors had professor Olexiy Markevitch, assistant professor Alexander Lev Borovikovsky. Son of Don Cossack was a law professor Sergei Ilovajskij. Among the students of the ancestors of the Cossacks had a native of Odessa, a microbiologist, Mykola Fedorovych Gamalija. We recorded in the documents in the history of the Novorossiys'k university 80 people among students of origin of the Cossacks. Of these 49 documents on receipt of such themselves as Cossacks, 31 as the sons of the Cossacks. The first five of the Cossacks, who have completed university studies for the first 25 years of its existence were the origin of the Ukrainian Cossacks. The most successful career of the graduates of the Cossacks did Opanas Ivanovych Pogibko - agronomist and Dmitro Ivanovich Dejneka – professor of anatomy.After a period of study persons Cossack origin to rank high in the social hierarchy. We know that M. Lenchyk worked as a secondary school teacher Melytopil, P. Kundius taught in Rostov on Don. I. Berezutski served as an Assistant Secretary in the military court Odesa. A. Orlenko taught russian language and history in Melitopol and Odesa. M. Yatlov taught in schools Berdyansk County. B. Jusko taught history at Odesa High School LK Hinkulovoyi and Iliadi, was the author of several works. F.M. Bondarenko became official in city government in Odesa, Odesa Ukrainian member of «Prosvita». For departments Cossacks as follows: 7 - History and Philology; 27 - of Physics (of which 14 - Natural compartment 13 - mathematics); 24 - law school; 22 - Medical Faculty. For families Cossack troops said persons representing almost all varieties: Ukrainian, left bank, Cossacks (including settlers in southern Ukraine) - 27; Kuban - 31; Don - 11; Terek - 4; Volga - 2; Trans-Baikal - 2. Being of three persons not clear, but inclined to believe that native Odessa L.S. Masenko and P.I. Polyakov were of Ukrainian Cossacks, P.A. Mahnachev to Terek. Obviously, the first two groups were common, Ukrainian roots. Help to train some people Cossack origin was a special scholarship Kuban Cossacks. In 1869 - 1870 years this scholarship received 4 people. In the years 1884-1885 this was one student scholarship of 300 rubles, in 1886, one student at a rate of 420 rubles.The conclusion of the article. In Novorosiys'k university taught and learned people who have ancestors of the Cossacks, the sons of the Cossacks, Cossacks and proper. Some of them made contributions to science and culture. In the future, it is necessary to investigate how the Cossack origin affect learning, the creation of individual societies, social circle. Probably find more people of the Cossacks, who studied at the Novorosiys'k university, especially in 1914-1920, respectively. ; Целью статьи является исследование места представителей казачьего сословия среди студентов и преподавателей одесского Новороссийского университета. Установлено количество и персональный состав студентов-казаков, их происхождение из разных казачьих сообществ: украинского и российского казачества. Прослежено судьбу ярких личностей. ; Метою статті є дослідження місця представників козацького стану серед студентів та викладачів Одеського Новоросійського університету. Встановлено кількість та персональний склад студентів-козаків, їх походження з різних козацьких спільнот: українського та російського козацтва. Простежено долю найяскравіших особистостей.

The aim of the article is to study the place of representatives of the Cossack class students and teachers of the Odesa Novorossiys'k university. Established the number and composition of the students of the cossacks, their origin from different cossack communities: ukrainian and russian cossacks. Traced the fate of the outstanding personalities.Novorosiys'k university was one of the universities that they were few in the Russian Empire. So he included the representatives not only of different ethnic and social groups, but also geographically diverse. This led to stay among teachers and students from different families Cossacks. In 1905-1907 years Cossack myth in its Russian version used Odesa Russian chauvinists, some of which could really be a Cossack (Don, etc.) origin and be besides associated with the University.Cossack ancestors had professor Olexiy Markevitch, assistant professor Alexander Lev Borovikovsky. Son of Don Cossack was a law professor Sergei Ilovajskij. Among the students of the ancestors of the Cossacks had a native of Odessa, a microbiologist, Mykola Fedorovych Gamalija. We recorded in the documents in the history of the Novorossiys'k university 80 people among students of origin of the Cossacks. Of these 49 documents on receipt of such themselves as Cossacks, 31 as the sons of the Cossacks. The first five of the Cossacks, who have completed university studies for the first 25 years of its existence were the origin of the Ukrainian Cossacks. The most successful career of the graduates of the Cossacks did Opanas Ivanovych Pogibko - agronomist and Dmitro Ivanovich Dejneka – professor of anatomy.After a period of study persons Cossack origin to rank high in the social hierarchy. We know that M. Lenchyk worked as a secondary school teacher Melytopil, P. Kundius taught in Rostov on Don. I. Berezutski served as an Assistant Secretary in the military court Odesa. A. Orlenko taught russian language and history in Melitopol and Odesa. M. Yatlov taught in schools Berdyansk County. B. Jusko taught ...

У статті до історіографії уведено досі не використаний біографами історика М. Слабченка текст: звіт студента Новоросійського університету М. Слабченка про свою роботу в київських архівах. Цей архівний рукописний текст відображає етап підготовки історика до своєї першої наукової монографії і є загалом першим відомим науковим текстом М. Слабченка про історію України козацької доби. Також текст відображає творчу лабораторію історика, архівні пошуки. ; В статье в историография впервые введено до сих пор не использованный биографами историка М. Слабченко текст: отчет студента Новороссийского университета М. Слабченко о своей работе в киевских архивах. Этот архивный рукописный текст отражает этап подготовки историка к своей первой научной монографии и является первым известным научным текстом М. Слабченко об истории Украины казацкой эпохи. Также текст отражает творческую лабораторию историка, его архивные поиски. ; The anniversary of the given out historian, founder of historical ukrainistik in Odesa Mykhajlo Slabchenko isrecently marked. The course of life of this personality already will not name insufficiently known, in fact in work of historians there are monographs, collections of documents, dissertation, personally devoted to М. Slabchenko. However, it does not mean that all possibilities of expansion of a springbase are already outspent. The initial phase of life of М.Slabchenko is enough dotted investigated. In this secretservice to historiography the until now not used by the biographers of historian М. Slabchenko text is entered: report of student of the Novorossisk university М. Slabchenka on his work in the Kyiv archives in 1908. This archived handwritten text represents the stage of preparation of historian to the first scientific monograph and is on the whole the first known scientific text of М. Slabchenko about history of Ukraine Cossack. Also text represents the creative laboratory of historian, archived searches. It is also one of sources from history of arkhivistik in Ukraine, in particular, Kiev archive. Text, which is published below, probably, was not the first scientific text of M. Slabchenko, in fact there is information, that in 1904/1905 school year of M.Slabchenko in quality the student of istorico-philological faculty of the Novorosiysk university gave work of «A peasant question in the legislative commission of EkaterinaII». He was rewarded a silver medal, already as a student of faculty of law. However, there is not this text in our order. In 1905-1910 years during studies on the faculty of law of M. Slabchenko betrayed neither the historical personal interests nor scientific leader – professor of department of Russian history to Ivan Linnichenko. His lectures in Odesa of «Prosvita» in 1908 the «Administrative line-up on Ukraine of XVII-VIII st.» and «A judicial line-up on Ukraine in XVII-XVIII st.» testify the reflection of M. Slabchenko studios above history of cossack Ukraine. Right. As the articles they did not reach to us. These lectures represent a work M. Slabchenko above the main work of student years – medal work from history of legal line-up of Getmanschina. Exactly working above this theme he left on searches in the Kiev archive. The report of M. Slabchenko on work in an university archive comes into a notice that, it is not only the dry list of the labours worked out by him, but also their analysis, with historiography retreats, that, in essence, by a scientific studio. M. Slabchenko used materials, transferred them in a report, in a few works of 1910th, published in Odesa. It is known from the letter to the Odesa historian A. Yakovlev on September, 6, 1909, that M. Slabchenko sent the article of «Chastizing on the judicial book of the Pryluky regiment» for a publication in «Messages» of Kiev Ukrainian scientific society, that also probably based on indicated by him in a report documents, but it got lost somewhere. Main from works of M. Slabchenko, that directly based on the indicated report, was him medal work of 1909 of « A malorusskiy regiment in an administrative relation: Historical-legal essay «in «Messages» of university and separate edition. From a report M. Slabchenko swims out, that at first he planned to name this work of « Higher establishments of Getmanschina XVII – XVIII st.». This name reminds edition under which lectures of M. Slabchenko were given out in 1918 year. For the «Malorusskiy regiment» M. Slabchenko got the gold medal after review of Linnichenko. Before this triumph there was other positive review of Linnichenko on the report published below.A professor marked that him a ward worked very with application and with a large benefit for the scientific labours, did in short time mass of very valuable extracts from acts, and expressed reasoning on the basis of acquaintance with them, that have an absolute scientific value.

У статті до історіографії уведено досі не використаний біографами історика М. Слабченка текст: звіт студента Новоросійського університету М. Слабченка про свою роботу в київських архівах. Цей архівний рукописний текст відображає етап підготовки історика до своєї першої наукової монографії і є загалом першим відомим науковим текстом М. Слабченка про історію України козацької доби. Також текст відображає творчу лабораторію історика, архівні пошуки. ; В статье в историография впервые введено до сих пор не использованный биографами историка М. Слабченко текст: отчет студента Новороссийского университета М. Слабченко о своей работе в киевских архивах. Этот архивный рукописный текст отражает этап подготовки историка к своей первой научной монографии и является первым известным научным текстом М. Слабченко об истории Украины казацкой эпохи. Также текст отражает творческую лабораторию историка, его архивные поиски. ; The anniversary of the given out historian, founder of historical ukrainistik in Odesa Mykhajlo Slabchenko isrecently marked. The course of life of this personality already will not name insufficiently known, in fact in work of historians there are monographs, collections of documents, dissertation, personally devoted to М. Slabchenko. However, it does not mean that all possibilities of expansion of a springbase are already outspent. The initial phase of life of М.Slabchenko is enough dotted investigated. In this secretservice to historiography the until now not used by the biographers of historian М. Slabchenko text is entered: report of student of the Novorossisk university М. Slabchenka on his work in the Kyiv archives in 1908. This archived handwritten text represents the stage of preparation of historian to the first scientific monograph and is on the whole the first known scientific text of М. Slabchenko about history of Ukraine Cossack. Also text represents the creative laboratory of historian, archived searches. It is also one of sources from history of arkhivistik in Ukraine, in particular, Kiev archive. Text, which is published below, probably, was not the first scientific text of M. Slabchenko, in fact there is information, that in 1904/1905 school year of M.Slabchenko in quality the student of istorico-philological faculty of the Novorosiysk university gave work of «A peasant question in the legislative commission of EkaterinaII». He was rewarded a silver medal, already as a student of faculty of law. However, there is not this text in our order. In 1905-1910 years during studies on the faculty of law of M. Slabchenko betrayed neither the historical personal interests nor scientific leader – professor of department of Russian history to Ivan Linnichenko. His lectures in Odesa of «Prosvita» in 1908 the «Administrative line-up on Ukraine of XVII-VIII st.» and «A judicial line-up on Ukraine in XVII-XVIII st.» testify the reflection of M. Slabchenko studios above history of cossack Ukraine. Right. As the articles they did not reach to us. These lectures represent a work M. Slabchenko above the main work of student years – medal work from history of legal line-up of Getmanschina. Exactly working above this theme he left on searches in the Kiev archive. The report of M. Slabchenko on work in an university archive comes into a notice that, it is not only the dry list of the labours worked out by him, but also their analysis, with historiography retreats, that, in essence, by a scientific studio. M. Slabchenko used materials, transferred them in a report, in a few works of 1910th, published in Odesa. It is known from the letter to the Odesa historian A. Yakovlev on September, 6, 1909, that M. Slabchenko sent the article of «Chastizing on the judicial book of the Pryluky regiment» for a publication in «Messages» of Kiev Ukrainian scientific society, that also probably based on indicated by him in a report documents, but it got lost somewhere. Main from works of M. Slabchenko, that directly based on the indicated report, was him medal work of 1909 of « A malorusskiy regiment in an administrative relation: Historical-legal essay «in «Messages» of university and separate edition. From a report M. Slabchenko swims out, that at first he planned to name this work of « Higher establishments of Getmanschina XVII – XVIII st.». This name reminds edition under which lectures of M. Slabchenko were given out in 1918 year. For the «Malorusskiy regiment» M. Slabchenko got the gold medal after review of Linnichenko. Before this triumph there was other positive review of Linnichenko on the report published below.A professor marked that him a ward worked very with application and with a large benefit for the scientific labours, did in short time mass of very valuable extracts from acts, and expressed reasoning on the basis of acquaintance with them, that have an absolute scientific value.

The anniversary of the given out historian, founder of historical ukrainistik in Odesa Mykhajlo Slabchenko isrecently marked. The course of life of this personality already will not name insufficiently known, in fact in work of historians there are monographs, collections of documents, dissertation, personally devoted to М. Slabchenko. However, it does not mean that all possibilities of expansion of a springbase are already outspent. The initial phase of life of М.Slabchenko is enough dotted investigated. In this secretservice to historiography the until now not used by the biographers of historian М. Slabchenko text is entered: report of student of the Novorossisk university М. Slabchenka on his work in the Kyiv archives in 1908. This archived handwritten text represents the stage of preparation of historian to the first scientific monograph and is on the whole the first known scientific text of М. Slabchenko about history of Ukraine Cossack. Also text represents the creative laboratory of historian, archived searches. It is also one of sources from history of arkhivistik in Ukraine, in particular, Kiev archive. Text, which is published below, probably, was not the first scientific text of M. Slabchenko, in fact there is information, that in 1904/1905 school year of M.Slabchenko in quality the student of istorico-philological faculty of the Novorosiysk university gave work of «A peasant question in the legislative commission of EkaterinaII». He was rewarded a silver medal, already as a student of faculty of law. However, there is not this text in our order. In 1905-1910 years during studies on the faculty of law of M. Slabchenko betrayed neither the historical personal interests nor scientific leader – professor of department of Russian history to Ivan Linnichenko. His lectures in Odesa of «Prosvita» in 1908 the «Administrative line-up on Ukraine of XVII-VIII st.» and «A judicial line-up on Ukraine in XVII-XVIII st.» testify the reflection of M. Slabchenko studios above history of cossack Ukraine. Right. As the ...

The aim of the article is to study the place of representatives of the Cossack class students and teachers of the Odesa Novorossiys'k university. Established the number and composition of the students of the cossacks, their origin from different cossack communities: ukrainian and russian cossacks. Traced the fate of the outstanding personalities.Novorosiys'k university was one of the universities that they were few in the Russian Empire. So he included the representatives not only of different ethnic and social groups, but also geographically diverse. This led to stay among teachers and students from different families Cossacks. In 1905-1907 years Cossack myth in its Russian version used Odesa Russian chauvinists, some of which could really be a Cossack (Don, etc.) origin and be besides associated with the University.Cossack ancestors had professor Olexiy Markevitch, assistant professor Alexander Lev Borovikovsky. Son of Don Cossack was a law professor Sergei Ilovajskij. Among the students of the ancestors of the Cossacks had a native of Odessa, a microbiologist, Mykola Fedorovych Gamalija. We recorded in the documents in the history of the Novorossiys'k university 80 people among students of origin of the Cossacks. Of these 49 documents on receipt of such themselves as Cossacks, 31 as the sons of the Cossacks. The first five of the Cossacks, who have completed university studies for the first 25 years of its existence were the origin of the Ukrainian Cossacks. The most successful career of the graduates of the Cossacks did Opanas Ivanovych Pogibko - agronomist and Dmitro Ivanovich Dejneka – professor of anatomy.After a period of study persons Cossack origin to rank high in the social hierarchy. We know that M. Lenchyk worked as a secondary school teacher Melytopil, P. Kundius taught in Rostov on Don. I. Berezutski served as an Assistant Secretary in the military court Odesa. A. Orlenko taught russian language and history in Melitopol and Odesa. M. Yatlov taught in schools Berdyansk County. B. Jusko taught history at Odesa High School LK Hinkulovoyi and Iliadi, was the author of several works. F.M. Bondarenko became official in city government in Odesa, Odesa Ukrainian member of «Prosvita». For departments Cossacks as follows: 7 - History and Philology; 27 - of Physics (of which 14 - Natural compartment 13 - mathematics); 24 - law school; 22 - Medical Faculty. For families Cossack troops said persons representing almost all varieties: Ukrainian, left bank, Cossacks (including settlers in southern Ukraine) - 27; Kuban - 31; Don - 11; Terek - 4; Volga - 2; Trans-Baikal - 2. Being of three persons not clear, but inclined to believe that native Odessa L.S. Masenko and P.I. Polyakov were of Ukrainian Cossacks, P.A. Mahnachev to Terek. Obviously, the first two groups were common, Ukrainian roots. Help to train some people Cossack origin was a special scholarship Kuban Cossacks. In 1869 - 1870 years this scholarship received 4 people. In the years 1884-1885 this was one student scholarship of 300 rubles, in 1886, one student at a rate of 420 rubles.The conclusion of the article. In Novorosiys'k university taught and learned people who have ancestors of the Cossacks, the sons of the Cossacks, Cossacks and proper. Some of them made contributions to science and culture. In the future, it is necessary to investigate how the Cossack origin affect learning, the creation of individual societies, social circle. Probably find more people of the Cossacks, who studied at the Novorosiys'k university, especially in 1914-1920, respectively. ; Целью статьи является исследование места представителей казачьего сословия среди студентов и преподавателей одесского Новороссийского университета. Установлено количество и персональный состав студентов-казаков, их происхождение из разных казачьих сообществ: украинского и российского казачества. Прослежено судьбу ярких личностей. ; Метою статті є дослідження місця представників козацького стану серед студентів та викладачів Одеського Новоросійського університету. Встановлено кількість та персональний склад студентів-козаків, їх походження з різних козацьких спільнот: українського та російського козацтва. Простежено долю найяскравіших особистостей.

The purposes of this article are to create a historical portrait of Sygarevyches' family, in particular, of Dmytro Dmytrovych Sygarevych (1868-1914), to give a definition of his place in the Ukrainian national movement, to make an analysis of his creative heritage. The conclusion is done, that D. Sygarevych was one of leaders of politicization process of the Ukrainian national movement. His living in Odesa, especially during 1905-1906 years, was the peak of his activity. D. Sygarevych was at the beginnings of the Ukrainian student's movement in Odesa, he promoted to acquaintance of wide sectors of society with the Ukrainian culture. ; Целью статьи является создание просопографического исторического портрета семьи Сигаревич, прежде всего, Дмитрия Дмитриевича Сигаревича (1868 – 1914), в частности, определения его места в украинском национальном движении, анализ его творческого наследия. Сделан вывод, что Д. Сигаревич был одним из лидеров процесса политизации украинского национального движения. Пиком его деятельности было время его проживания в Одессе, особенно 1905-1906 гг. Д. Сигаревич стоял у истоков украинского студенческого движения в Одессе, содействовал ознакомлению широких слоев общества с украинской культурой. ; Метою статті є реконструкція внеску родини Сигаревичів, передусім Дмитра Дмитровича Сигаревича (1868 – 1914), у процес українського націєтворення наприкінці ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст.

The purposes of this article are to create a historical portrait of Sygarevyches' family, in particular, of Dmytro Dmytrovych Sygarevych (1868-1914), to give a definition of his place in the Ukrainian national movement, to make an analysis of his creative heritage. The conclusion is done, that D. Sygarevych was one of leaders of politicization process of the Ukrainian national movement. His living in Odesa, especially during 1905-1906 years, was the peak of his activity. D. Sygarevych was at the beginnings of the Ukrainian student's movement in Odesa, he promoted to acquaintance of wide sectors of society with the Ukrainian culture. ; Целью статьи является создание просопографического исторического портрета семьи Сигаревич, прежде всего, Дмитрия Дмитриевича Сигаревича (1868 – 1914), в частности, определения его места в украинском национальном движении, анализ его творческого наследия. Сделан вывод, что Д. Сигаревич был одним из лидеров процесса политизации украинского национального движения. Пиком его деятельности было время его проживания в Одессе, особенно 1905-1906 гг. Д. Сигаревич стоял у истоков украинского студенческого движения в Одессе, содействовал ознакомлению широких слоев общества с украинской культурой. ; Метою статті є реконструкція внеску родини Сигаревичів, передусім Дмитра Дмитровича Сигаревича (1868 – 1914), у процес українського націєтворення наприкінці ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст.

Метою цієї статті є висвітлення процесу зародження та розвитку проєктів одеських істориків кінця ХІХ – початку ХХ ст., що з різних причин так і не були реалізовані. Зроблено висновок, що на прикладі історії одеських проєктів випливає, що історія таких видань майже завжди відображає особливості загального доробку вчених, дозволяє глибше зануритися в особливості інтелектуального механізму, демонструє взаємозв'язок соціальних, політичних, економічних, наукових, психоемоційних чинників, показує переваги та недоліки колективних проєктів, розширяє наше уявлення про бібліометричні показники на просопографічному та особистісному рівнях. ; Целью этой статьи является реконструкция ряда научно-издательских проектов одесских историков конца XIX – начала ХХ вв., которые в полной мере так и не были завершены. Комплексно проблема в историографии не рассматривалась, хотя в нескольких публикациях упомянуто об отдельных аспектах. Нами использована широкая база источников, прежде всего, нарративных, то есть имеющиеся тексты историков. Вспомогательными были для нас актовые, эпистолярные, газетные источники. Часть из этих источников является архивными. Один из первых известных нам совместных издательских проектов двух одесских ученых приходится на начальный период существования Новороссийского университета. Профессоры кафедры канонического права А. С. Павлова и 81 истории И. А. Линниченко длительное время лелеял планы издания актовых источников средневековой истории Западной Украины. В зародыше остался проект профессора кафедры истории русского права А. Я. Шпакова «История секуляризации церковного имущества в Новгороде при Иване ІІІ». На стадии готовности находился проект издания иллюстрированного атласа по истории средневекового и византийского искусства профессора кафедры теории и истории искусств историко-филологического факультета. А. А. Павловского. Углубление процесса институционализации исторических исследований вызвало коллективные проекты, которые способствовали идентификации научных школ, закреплению традиций одесской историографии. В 1911–1914 гг. группа профессоров работала над изданием большого сборника научных трудов в честь юбилея Ф. И. Успенского. Сборник должен был быть издан как двадцать первый том периодического издания Историко-филологического общества при Новороссийском университете. В начале 1910-х годов профессора работали над проектом издания большого труда по истории Новороссийского университета к пятидесятилетию заведения. Фактически издательским архивом этого проекта является часть архивного личного фонда А. П. Доброклонского, который хранится под номером 157 в Государственном архиве Одесской области. Здесь представлены ценные автобиографии и биографии ряда профессоров, статистические сводки. Однако, все эти дела свидетельствуют, что проект вряд ли успел продвинуться дальше чем подготовительная стадия. Помешала война, революции. Бывали случаи, когда творческое наследие умерших историков все же благодаря их родственникам и коллегам становилась достоянием потомков. Так были изданы труды П. К. Бруна, П. А. Юрченко, С. И. Иловайского. Итак, причина нереализованности ряда творческих издательских проектов одесских историков в конце XIX – начале ХХ вв. заключалась в разных плоскостях. Иногда это отражало особенности жизненного ритма историков, снижение темпов их интеллектуального труда, прежде всего вследствие педагогической загруженности, проблем со здоровьем. Часто говорилось о материальных причинах, которые преследовали историков на всех этапах вплоть до сегодняшнего дня. Специфическим обстоятельством была ограниченность тогдашних историков относительно механизмов дистанционного труда, их ментальная неготовность к реализации совместных проектов на расстоянии друг от друга. В общем, во-первых, история нереализованных издательских проектов почти всегда отражает особенности общего наследия ученых, во-вторых, позволяет глубже погрузиться в особенности интеллектуального механизма, в-третьих, демонстрирует взаимосвязь социальных, политических, экономических, научных, психоэмоциональных факторов в-четвертых, показывает преимущества и недостатки коллективных проектов, в-пятых, расширяет наше представление о библиометрических показателях на просопографическом и личностном уровнях. Выявление рукописей, издание наиболее актуальных из них является перспективным направлением дальнейших историографических, книговедческих и библиографических исследований. ; The purpose of this article is to reconstruct a number of scientific publishing projects of Odessa historians of the late 19th – early 20th centuries, which were never fully completed. The problem was not considered comprehensively in historiography, although several publications mention certain aspects. We have used a wide base of sources, primarily narrative, that is, the available texts of historians. Auxiliary were for us act, epistolary, newspaper sources. Some of these sources are archived. One of the first joint publishing projects of two Odesa scientists known to us falls on the initial period of the existence of Novorossiysk University. Professors of the department of canon law O. S. Pavlov and the history of Russian law F. I. Leontovych worked on the preparation of a collection of the most important monuments of Old Russian law. But the project was not implemented due to the move of O.S. Pavlov to Moscow. For a long time, Professor of the Department of Russian History I. A. Lynnychenko cherished plans to publish documentary sources of the medieval history of Western Ukraine. The project of the professor of the Department of History of Russian Law A. Ya. Shpakov "History of the secularization of church property in Novgorod under Ivan III" remained in its infancy. At the best stage of readiness was the project of publishing an illustrated atlas on the history of medieval and Byzantine art by the professor of the Department of Theory and History of Arts of the Faculty of History and Philology. O.A. Pavlovsky. The deepening of the process of institutionalization of historical research caused collective projects that contributed to the identification of scientific schools, consolidation of the traditions of Odesa historiography. In 1911–1914, a group of professors worked on the publication of a large collection of scientific papers in honor of the anniversary of F. I. Uspensky. The collection was to be published as the twenty-first volume of the periodical of the Historical and Philological Society at Novorossiysk University. In the early 1910s, the professors worked on a project to publish a large work on the history of Novorossiysk University for the fiftieth anniversary of the institution. In fact, the publishing archive of this project is a part of O. P. Dobroklonsky, which is stored at number 157 in the State Archives of the Odessa region. Here are presented valuable autobiographies and biographies of a number of professors, statistical summaries. However, all these cases indicate that the project hardly managed to move further than the preparatory stage. War, revolution prevented. There have been cases when the creative heritage of deceased historians, thanks to their relatives and colleagues, became the property of descendants. This is how the works of P. K. Bruna, P. O. Yurchenko, S. I. Ilovaisky. So, the reason for the failure to implement a number of creative publishing projects of Odessa historians in the late XIX – early XX century was in different planes. Sometimes this reflected the peculiarities of the life rhythm of historians, a decrease in the pace of their intellectual work, primarily due to pedagogical workload, health problems. It was often said about the material reasons that haunted historians at all stages of history up to the present day. A specific circumstance was the limitations of the then historians regarding the mechanisms of remote labor, their mental unpreparedness for the implementation of joint projects at a distance from each other. In general, firstly, the history of unrealized publishing projects almost always reflects the features of the common heritage of scientists; secondly, it allows one to dive deeper into the features of the intellectual mechanism; thirdly, it demonstrates the interconnection of social, political, economic, scientific, psycho-emotional factors; and fourthly , shows the advantages and disadvantages of collective projects, fifthly, expands our understanding of bibliometric indicators at the prosopographic and personal levels. Revealing of manuscripts, archaeographic publication of the most relevant of them is a promising direction for further historiographic, bibliological and bibliographic research.

Метою цієї статті є висвітлення процесу зародження та розвитку проєктів одеських істориків кінця ХІХ – початку ХХ ст., що з різних причин так і не були реалізовані. Зроблено висновок, що на прикладі історії одеських проєктів випливає, що історія таких видань майже завжди відображає особливості загального доробку вчених, дозволяє глибше зануритися в особливості інтелектуального механізму, демонструє взаємозв'язок соціальних, політичних, економічних, наукових, психоемоційних чинників, показує переваги та недоліки колективних проєктів, розширяє наше уявлення про бібліометричні показники на просопографічному та особистісному рівнях. ; Целью этой статьи является реконструкция ряда научно-издательских проектов одесских историков конца XIX – начала ХХ вв., которые в полной мере так и не были завершены. Комплексно проблема в историографии не рассматривалась, хотя в нескольких публикациях упомянуто об отдельных аспектах. Нами использована широкая база источников, прежде всего, нарративных, то есть имеющиеся тексты историков. Вспомогательными были для нас актовые, эпистолярные, газетные источники. Часть из этих источников является архивными. Один из первых известных нам совместных издательских проектов двух одесских ученых приходится на начальный период существования Новороссийского университета. Профессоры кафедры канонического права А. С. Павлова и 81 истории И. А. Линниченко длительное время лелеял планы издания актовых источников средневековой истории Западной Украины. В зародыше остался проект профессора кафедры истории русского права А. Я. Шпакова «История секуляризации церковного имущества в Новгороде при Иване ІІІ». На стадии готовности находился проект издания иллюстрированного атласа по истории средневекового и византийского искусства профессора кафедры теории и истории искусств историко-филологического факультета. А. А. Павловского. Углубление процесса институционализации исторических исследований вызвало коллективные проекты, которые способствовали идентификации научных школ, закреплению традиций одесской историографии. В 1911–1914 гг. группа профессоров работала над изданием большого сборника научных трудов в честь юбилея Ф. И. Успенского. Сборник должен был быть издан как двадцать первый том периодического издания Историко-филологического общества при Новороссийском университете. В начале 1910-х годов профессора работали над проектом издания большого труда по истории Новороссийского университета к пятидесятилетию заведения. Фактически издательским архивом этого проекта является часть архивного личного фонда А. П. Доброклонского, который хранится под номером 157 в Государственном архиве Одесской области. Здесь представлены ценные автобиографии и биографии ряда профессоров, статистические сводки. Однако, все эти дела свидетельствуют, что проект вряд ли успел продвинуться дальше чем подготовительная стадия. Помешала война, революции. Бывали случаи, когда творческое наследие умерших историков все же благодаря их родственникам и коллегам становилась достоянием потомков. Так были изданы труды П. К. Бруна, П. А. Юрченко, С. И. Иловайского. Итак, причина нереализованности ряда творческих издательских проектов одесских историков в конце XIX – начале ХХ вв. заключалась в разных плоскостях. Иногда это отражало особенности жизненного ритма историков, снижение темпов их интеллектуального труда, прежде всего вследствие педагогической загруженности, проблем со здоровьем. Часто говорилось о материальных причинах, которые преследовали историков на всех этапах вплоть до сегодняшнего дня. Специфическим обстоятельством была ограниченность тогдашних историков относительно механизмов дистанционного труда, их ментальная неготовность к реализации совместных проектов на расстоянии друг от друга. В общем, во-первых, история нереализованных издательских проектов почти всегда отражает особенности общего наследия ученых, во-вторых, позволяет глубже погрузиться в особенности интеллектуального механизма, в-третьих, демонстрирует взаимосвязь социальных, политических, экономических, научных, психоэмоциональных факторов в-четвертых, показывает преимущества и недостатки коллективных проектов, в-пятых, расширяет наше представление о библиометрических показателях на просопографическом и личностном уровнях. Выявление рукописей, издание наиболее актуальных из них является перспективным направлением дальнейших историографических, книговедческих и библиографических исследований. ; The purpose of this article is to reconstruct a number of scientific publishing projects of Odessa historians of the late 19th – early 20th centuries, which were never fully completed. The problem was not considered comprehensively in historiography, although several publications mention certain aspects. We have used a wide base of sources, primarily narrative, that is, the available texts of historians. Auxiliary were for us act, epistolary, newspaper sources. Some of these sources are archived. One of the first joint publishing projects of two Odesa scientists known to us falls on the initial period of the existence of Novorossiysk University. Professors of the department of canon law O. S. Pavlov and the history of Russian law F. I. Leontovych worked on the preparation of a collection of the most important monuments of Old Russian law. But the project was not implemented due to the move of O.S. Pavlov to Moscow. For a long time, Professor of the Department of Russian History I. A. Lynnychenko cherished plans to publish documentary sources of the medieval history of Western Ukraine. The project of the professor of the Department of History of Russian Law A. Ya. Shpakov "History of the secularization of church property in Novgorod under Ivan III" remained in its infancy. At the best stage of readiness was the project of publishing an illustrated atlas on the history of medieval and Byzantine art by the professor of the Department of Theory and History of Arts of the Faculty of History and Philology. O.A. Pavlovsky. The deepening of the process of institutionalization of historical research caused collective projects that contributed to the identification of scientific schools, consolidation of the traditions of Odesa historiography. In 1911–1914, a group of professors worked on the publication of a large collection of scientific papers in honor of the anniversary of F. I. Uspensky. The collection was to be published as the twenty-first volume of the periodical of the Historical and Philological Society at Novorossiysk University. In the early 1910s, the professors worked on a project to publish a large work on the history of Novorossiysk University for the fiftieth anniversary of the institution. In fact, the publishing archive of this project is a part of O. P. Dobroklonsky, which is stored at number 157 in the State Archives of the Odessa region. Here are presented valuable autobiographies and biographies of a number of professors, statistical summaries. However, all these cases indicate that the project hardly managed to move further than the preparatory stage. War, revolution prevented. There have been cases when the creative heritage of deceased historians, thanks to their relatives and colleagues, became the property of descendants. This is how the works of P. K. Bruna, P. O. Yurchenko, S. I. Ilovaisky. So, the reason for the failure to implement a number of creative publishing projects of Odessa historians in the late XIX – early XX century was in different planes. Sometimes this reflected the peculiarities of the life rhythm of historians, a decrease in the pace of their intellectual work, primarily due to pedagogical workload, health problems. It was often said about the material reasons that haunted historians at all stages of history up to the present day. A specific circumstance was the limitations of the then historians regarding the mechanisms of remote labor, their mental unpreparedness for the implementation of joint projects at a distance from each other. In general, firstly, the history of unrealized publishing projects almost always reflects the features of the common heritage of scientists; secondly, it allows one to dive deeper into the features of the intellectual mechanism; thirdly, it demonstrates the interconnection of social, political, economic, scientific, psycho-emotional factors; and fourthly , shows the advantages and disadvantages of collective projects, fifthly, expands our understanding of bibliometric indicators at the prosopographic and personal levels. Revealing of manuscripts, archaeographic publication of the most relevant of them is a promising direction for further historiographic, bibliological and bibliographic research.

У статті досліджено процес формування військово-історичного напряму в історіографічному процесі на території Південної України у ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст. Дослідження розгорталися у межах 3 основних етапів: перша половина ХІХ ст. – поява перших праць, накопичення джерел, перші кроки у згуртуванні вчених; 1860-ті – 1890-ті роки – вдосконалення досліджень у зв'язку з накопи­ченням джерел; перші 14 років ХХ ст. – найвища стадія розвитку, поява найбільш яскравих авторів. Дослідження проводилися двома групами осіб: світськими та військовими, що взаємодоповнювали один одного. Праці охоплювали усю історію від давнини до аналізу нещодавніх війн їх учасниками. ; The purpose of this article is to analyze the process of formation of the military-historical direction in the historiographical process on the territory of Southern Ukraine in the second half of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The research was conducted by two groups of people: secular and military, mutually complementing each other. Chronologically, works on military-historical subjects covered the entire history from antiquity to the genre, which can be defined by the newfangled concept of "modern history", since it concerned the analysis of recent wars (Crimea, between Russian and Japanese empires) by their participants, who used their memories as well and memories of other people and documents, that is, working as historians.

У статті досліджено процес формування військово-історичного напряму в історіографічному процесі на території Південної України у ХІХ – на початку ХХ ст. Дослідження розгорталися у межах 3 основних етапів: перша половина ХІХ ст. – поява перших праць, накопичення джерел, перші кроки у згуртуванні вчених; 1860-ті – 1890-ті роки – вдосконалення досліджень у зв'язку з накопи­ченням джерел; перші 14 років ХХ ст. – найвища стадія розвитку, поява найбільш яскравих авторів. Дослідження проводилися двома групами осіб: світськими та військовими, що взаємодоповнювали один одного. Праці охоплювали усю історію від давнини до аналізу нещодавніх війн їх учасниками. ; The purpose of this article is to analyze the process of formation of the military-historical direction in the historiographical process on the territory of Southern Ukraine in the second half of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The research was conducted by two groups of people: secular and military, mutually complementing each other. Chronologically, works on military-historical subjects covered the entire history from antiquity to the genre, which can be defined by the newfangled concept of "modern history", since it concerned the analysis of recent wars (Crimea, between Russian and Japanese empires) by their participants, who used their memories as well and memories of other people and documents, that is, working as historians.