The Right to Health in an Era of Privatisation and Globalisation: National and International Perspectives
In: Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice, Daphne Barak-Erez & Aeyal Gross eds., 289-339 (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2007)
30 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice, Daphne Barak-Erez & Aeyal Gross eds., 289-339 (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2007)
SSRN
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 101, S. 129-132
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, 391-414 (Robert Wintemute and Mads Andenas eds., Hart Publishing 2001)
SSRN
In: Berkeley Journal of International Law, Band 33, Heft 2, S. 2015
SSRN
Exploring Social Rights looks into the theoretical and practical implications of social rights. The book is organised in five parts. Part I considers theoretical aspects of social rights, and looks into their place within political and legal theory and within the human rights tradition; Part II looks at the status of social rights in international law, with reference to the challenge of globalisation and to the significance of specific regional regulation (such as the European System); Part III includes discussions of various legal systems which are of special interest in this area (Canada, So
In: The Right to Health at the Public/Private Divide: A Global Comparative Study, 1-16 (Colleen Flood & Aeyal Gross eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014)
SSRN
In: Health and Human Rights, Band 16, Heft 2
This article presents research demonstrating that the right to health plays different roles in different types of health systems. In high-income countries with tax-funded health systems, we usually encounter a lack of an enforceable right to heath. In contrast, rights play a more significant role in social health insurance/managed competition systems (which are present in a mixture of high-income and middle-income countries). There is concern, for example in Colombia, that a high volume of rights litigation can challenge the very sustainability of a public health care system and distort resources away from those most in need. Finally, in middle-income countries with big gaps between a poor public health system and a rich private one, we are more likely to find an express constitutional right to health care (or one is inferred from, for example, the right to life). In some of these countries, constitutional rights were included as part of the transition to democracy and an attempt to address huge inequities within society. Here the scale of health inequities suggests that courts need to be bolder in their interpretation of health care rights. We conclude that in adjudicating health rights, courts should scrutinize decision-making through the lens of health equity and equality to better achieve the inherent values of health human rights. Adapted from the source document.
In: Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice, Daphne Barak-Erez & Aeyal Gross eds., 243-261 (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2007); ISBN: 9781841136134
SSRN
Working paper
In: Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice, Daphne Barak-Erez & Aeyal Gross eds., 243-261 (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2007)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Position Paper No. 37, The Israeli Law Professors' Forum for Democracy פורום המרצות והמרצים למשפטים למען הדמוקרטיה, נייר עמדה מס' 37
SSRN
In: J. King & O. Ferraz (eds), The Oxford Compendium of National Legal Responses to Covid-19 (Oxford University Press, 2021)
SSRN
In: European journal of risk regulation: EJRR ; at the intersection of global law, science and policy, Band 12, Heft 2, S. 308-320
ISSN: 2190-8249
Israel's vaccination percentage was among the highest recorded worldwide. The Israeli government opted for a model using a proof-of-vaccine document ("Green Pass"). However, the "Green Pass" policy raises practical, legal and ethical concerns. While immunisation passports could be utilised to protect one's health, significant legal difficulties arise from their usage as a vaccination encouragement scheme. Protecting health is a proper purpose, particularly as minimising the pandemic ameliorates the human rights violations that stem from the COVID-19 response, enables individuals to return to their daily lives and enhances economic activity. However, any privileges or restrictions guided by one's COVID-19 immunisation status must be designed with the utmost attention to prevent a disproportionate violation of the human rights of the non-vaccinated and the public at large. Furthermore, as "Green Pass" policies might entrench existing discriminatory structures, ensuring equality is vital in moving forward. By exploring two case studies – labour rights and the right to privacy – we demonstrate the legal and public implications of the "Green Pass" regime. Despite the removal of the "Green Pass" in Israel, discussions continue regarding its modified reimplementation. The wider implications of the model might extend beyond its specific legal arrangements and limited temporal phase, requiring us to bring long-term public health into consideration.
In: University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper No.14/2023
SSRN