Knowledge and valuation in markets
In: Theory and society: renewal and critique in social theory, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 111-131
ISSN: 1573-7853
37 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Theory and society: renewal and critique in social theory, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 111-131
ISSN: 1573-7853
In: The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 477
In: The American journal of economics and sociology, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 379-398
ISSN: 1536-7150
Abstract. The purpose of this article is to analyze the relation between scientific knowledge in the form of theories and the world that such theories are about. The focus is on market theories. I argue that everyday knowledge, conceptualized using the notion of "lifeworld," is the bedrock of scientific knowledge. I also make two distinctions, one between types of markets and one between principles of order in markets. There are two different types of markets, fixed‐role markets and switch‐role markets, and no existing theory can be used to explain both of them. In fixed‐role markets, such as a producer market of garments, actors are identified as either sellers or buyers. In switch‐role markets, such as the stock exchange market or currency market, actors are not identified with one role. The other distinction is between standard and status markets. In a status market, order is maintained because the identities of actors on both sides of the market are ranked according to status, which is a more entrenched social construction than the commodity traded in the market. In a market characterized by standards, the situation is reversed: the commodity is a more entrenched social construction than the social status of actors in the market. These distinctions are the backdrop of my analysis of the idea that markets are performed. It is concluded that the performativity approach is useful today for analyzing switch‐role markets. A further conclusion is that neoclassical economic theory can be used in understanding switch‐role markets, but not fixed‐role markets.
The objective is to consider ethics in global production networks of fashion apparel from an economic-sociology viewpoint. The sociological market scholarship concurs that neoclassical economic theory encourages a model of markets that is out of sync with actual markets. Economists, by & large, do not emphasize dissimilarities between markets. New economic sociologists, who analyze actual markets, contend conversely that markets have diverse forms. It is demonstrated here how ethics is fostered in the global production chain of garment markets. General remarks on the linkage between markets & ethics lay the groundwork for this discussion. Figures. K. Coddon
In: Distinktion: scandinavian journal of social theory, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 41-57
ISSN: 2159-9149
In: The American journal of sociology, Band 109, Heft 2, S. 517-519
ISSN: 1537-5390
In: Sociologisk forskning: sociological research : journal of the Swedish Sociological Association, Band 39, Heft 1, S. 6-29
ISSN: 2002-066X
In: The American journal of economics and sociology, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 519-545
ISSN: 1536-7150
The aim of the paper is to present the economic sociology of Vilfredo Pareto. We argue that Pareto represents a mode of thinking that has not been used in economic sociology and barely considered in the other branches of sociology. We reject the habitual bifurcation of Pareto into "the economist" and "the sociologist." Pareto stresses the non‐logical parts of human life, and he provides empirical examples of this in his writing. He was occupied with the dynamics in society as a result mainly of non‐logical actions. We show how one may speak of a distinctly Paretian economic sociology, which primarily has its origin in his theoretical discussions. We also show that Pareto conducted empirical studies drawing from his version of economic sociology. Included is finally a presentation, as well as a discussion of Pareto's idea of rentiers and speculators, which is followed up by a more general discussion of economic types in the market.
In: Sociologisk forskning: sociological research : journal of the Swedish Sociological Association, Band 34, Heft 4, S. 73-80
ISSN: 2002-066X
The purpose of this book is to explore new developments in the field of economic sociology. It contains cutting-edge theoretical discussions by some of the world's leading economic sociologists, with chapters on topics such as the economic convention, relational sociology, economic identity, economy and law, economic networks and institutions.
For any market to work properly, certain key elements are necessary: competition, pricing, rules, clearly defined offers, and easy access to information. Without these components, there would be chaos. Orderly Fashion examines how order is maintained in the different interconnected consumer, producer, and credit markets of the global fashion industry. From retailers in Sweden and the United Kingdom to producers in India and Turkey, Patrik Aspers focuses on branded garment retailers--chains such as Gap, H&M, Old Navy, Topshop, and Zara. Aspers investigates these retailers' interactions and com
In: Qualitative sociology, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 599-608
ISSN: 1573-7837
AbstractIn this text we respond and elaborate on the four comments addressing our original article. In that piece we define qualitative research as an "iterative process in which improved understanding to the scientific community is achieved by making new significant distinctions resulting from getting closer to the phenomenon studied." In light of the comments, we identify three positions in relation to our contribution: (1) to not define qualitative research; (2) to work with one definition for each study or approach of "qualitative research" which is predominantly left implicit; (3) to systematically define qualitative research. This article elaborates on these positions and argues that a definition is a point of departure for researchers, including those reflecting on, or researching, the fields of qualitative and quantitative research. The proposed definition can be used both as a standard of evaluation as well as a catalyst for discussions on how to evaluate and innovate different styles of work.
In: Global networks: a journal of transnational affairs, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 454-471
ISSN: 1471-0374
AbstractIn this study, we analyse the consequences of the conditions of the labour‐market contracts for working on board merchant ships. More specifically, we examine how seafarers hired on different contracts work together. Seafarers' conditions of work differ considerably: some, mainly workers in the West, have permanent contracts with a shipping company, are paid a relatively high monthly wage and can go ashore every second month, whereas others performing the same tasks may have to stay at sea for more than six months at a time, and work for less money on temporary contracts. Drawing on the economic sociology of markets and institutional theory, in this article we present the institutional conditions of globalized labour markets for seafarers and analyse unique data derived from observations and interviews on board merchant ships. We argue that the notion of market is a key explanatory factor for how the work is conducted on board. Theoretically, our elaboration on markets allows us to conceptualize and address global and transnational markets.
In: Qualitative sociology, Band 42, Heft 2, S. 139-160
ISSN: 1573-7837