Suchergebnisse

This paper examines the legal & political justification for imposing restrictions to freedom of speech, just for the cause of protect communitarian religious belief. Through examination of some paradigmatic examples, the author makes the defense of a radical liberalism that entails the claim of a complete secular State. In this very, religious freedom must be seen as a negative liberty. Adapted from the source document.

El objeto de este trabajo es analizar algunos aspectos de la nueva ley en relación con el Convenio del Consejo de Europa sobre acceso a los documentos públicos.

SUMARIO:
I. INTRODUCCIÓNII. LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL Nº 30/2001 Y SUS EFECTOSIII. ANÁLISIS DE LA APLICABILIDAD DE LA CAUSA DE NULIDAD PREVISTA EN EL ART. 62.1.B) DE LA LEY 30/1992 A LOS ACTOS DICTADOS POR LA COMUNIDAD AUTÓNOMA AL AMPARO DE DEL ART. 51 DEL ESTATUTO DE AUTONOMÍAIV. LA EXISTENCIA DE LÍMITES A LA DECLARACIÓN DE NULIDAD, AUN EN EL SUPUESTO EN QUE SE CONSIDERARA APLICABLE LA CAUSA DE NULIDAD DE PLENO DERECHO DEL ART. 62.1.B) DE LA LEY 30/1992. EL ART. 106 DE LA LEY 30/1992V. ANÁLISIS DE LA CUESTIÓN DESDE EL DERECHO COMUNITARIO EUROPEOVI. LOS JUECES ESPAÑOLES Y EL DERECHO COMUNITARIO EUROPEOVII.BREVES CONSIDERACIONES FINALES SOBRE CÓMO PODRÍA DARSE RESPUESTA AL PROBLEMA SUSCITADO UNIFICANDO LA SOLUCIÓNVIII. CONCLUSIONES

This book intertwines two major themes in contemporary legal theory -- the concepts of human dignity and the problem of the autonomy and limits of the law -- while also addressing two other key aspects -- the first one concerned with human rights practices and foundations (in their direct connections with the issue of dignity), the second one considering the role that the law's aspirations attribute to the experience of an autonomous subject-person (and the demands that identify his/her position in the dialectical counterpoint with the rethinking of a community). The diversity of perspectives that each of these themes allows is explored in various contexts and with unmistakable implications concerning juridical validity, rule of law practices, pluralism, political and practical-cultural challenges, and divisive "bio-ethical" issues. This means considering the separation or separability theses between law and morality and the juridically relevant experience of person(hood) as a dialectic between autonomy and responsibility, the orthodox and heterodox images of comparable concreteness and incomparable singularity, the challenges of external points of view and interdisciplinary approaches

This book intertwines two major themes in contemporary legal theory the concepts of human dignity and the problem of the autonomy and limits of the law while also addressing two other key aspects the first one concerned with human rights practices and foundations (in their direct connections with the issue of dignity), the second one considering the role that the laws aspirations attribute to the experience of an autonomous subject-person (and the demands that identify his/her position in the dialectical counterpoint with the rethinking of a community). The diversity of perspectives that each of these themes allows is explored in various contexts and with unmistakable implications concerning juridical validity, rule of law practices, pluralism, political and practical-cultural challenges, and divisive "bio-ethical" issues. This means considering the separation or separability theses between law and morality and the juridically relevant experience of person(hood) as a dialectic between autonomy and responsibility, the orthodox and heterodox images of comparable concreteness and incomparable singularity, the challenges of external points of view and interdisciplinary approaches.