In: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie: ARSP = Archives for philosophy of law and social philosophy = Archives de philosophie du droit et de philosophie sociale = Archivo de filosofía jurídica y social, Band 91, Heft 2, S. 291-293
Generalklauseln wie Treu und Glauben oder die Guten Sitten werden in der gegenwärtigen Privatrechtsdiskussion meist nur unter dem Aspekt ihrer Konkretisierung, d.h. der Ableitung präziserer, unmittelbar anwendbarer Rechtssätze behandelt. Marietta Auer zeigt dagegen, daß man ihrer Funktion nur mit Berücksichtigung der ethischen und historischen Grundlagen der Privatrechtsentwicklung während des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts gerecht werden kann.
The meaning, function and desirable scope of good faith in contractual performance is one of the most pervasive problems of European as well as American contract law. Yet, the discussion seems to be locked into a set of inescapable dilemmas which frequently reappear as a typical, but unsatisfactory part of academic contributions and judicial opinions; namely, the controversies between an individualist ethics of freedom of contract and the opposing altruist value of interpersonal responsibility, between the danger of judicial arbitrariness and the demand for equitable flexibility, and, finally, between the legitimacy of judicial law making and the insistence on judicial restraint. This article attempts to show a pattern behind this structure, consisting of a relatively small set of typical arguments which appear in ordered pairs of diametrical oppositions such as those mentioned above. This suggests that good faith language is much less tailored to context and much more dependent on a preexistent structure of stereotyped arguments than it usually appears in the practice of legal discourse. This insight implies a new assessment of the cogency of argument patterns deployed in theoretical and doctrinal statements on good faith.
Der Band versammelt die für die akademische Gedenkfeier für Michael Stolleis (1941-2021) am 24. Juni 2022 verfassten Vorträge. Sie würdigen die vielfältigen Facetten des Juristen und Historikers, des Wissenschaftlers wie des Hochschullehrers. Einige Aufsätze beleuchten im Anschluss an sein Werk die Wissenschaftsgeschichte des deutschen Völkerrechts oder die Geschichte des Kolonialrechts; andere stellen seine große Bedeutung für europäische Kolleginnen und Kollegen heraus. Doch alle Beiträge durchzieht ein Grundgedanke: dass Rechtsgeschichte und Rechtsgeschichten untrennbar zusammengehören, wie es Stolleis in seinem letzten Buch unter dem Titel recht erzählen (2021) meisterhaft vorführte. So halten persönliche Erinnerungen von Freunden und Wegbegleiter das Andenken an den einzigartigen Erzähler vom Recht fest. Auch Michael Stolleis selbst kommt noch einmal in einem wieder abgedruckten Gespräch über Väter, Bildungswege und Zeitgenossenschaft zu Wort.This volume presents the lectures written for the academic memorial service for Michael Stolleis (1941-2021) on June 24, 2022. They pay tribute to the many facets of the jurist and historian, the scientist as well as the university teacher. Tying in with his work, some essays shed light on the academic history of "German international law" or the history of colonial law; others highlight his great importance for European colleagues. Yet through all the contributions runs one basic idea: that legal history and legal histories inseparably belong together, as Stolleis masterfully demonstrated in his last book bearing the title "recht erzählen" (2021). Thus, personal recollections of friends and academic companions sustain the memory of an unique narrator of law. Michael Stolleis himself also has his say once again in a reprinted conversation about fathers, educational paths and contemporaneity
Front Cover -- Impressum -- Vorwort -- Inhalt -- Grußwort des Präsidenten der Goethe-Universität -- Grußwort des Dekans des Fachbereichs Rechtswissenschaft der Goethe-Universität -- Grußwort der Geschäftsführenden Direktorin am Max-Planck-Institut für Rechtsgeschichte und Rechtstheorie -- B. Schlink: Rechtsgeschichte und Rechtsgeschichten -- A. Gaillet: Michael Stolleis - eine französische Hommage -- M. Vec: »Deutsches Völkerrecht« - Eine Wissenschaftsgeschichte -- P. Cancik: Zur Geschichte des Kolonialrechts - ein Gespräch -- M. Kunze: Schlusswort -- »Rechtshistoriker sind Historiker«. Ein Gespräch mit Michael Stolleis über Väter, Bildungswege und Zeitgenossenschaft.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
When Italy and Germany joined the 'scramble for Africa' and established colonies on the continent in the late 19th century, they, like other imperial powers before them, had to deal with the question of how to define the legal status of the inhabitants of these territories. This book takes Eritrea and German East Africa as case studies to comparatively analyze norms and practices of citizenship. It focuses on racism and other elements that influenced colonial governmentality.
This book examines the process of electoral reform in the Bahamas during the 20th century in the broader context of decolonisation. Beginning with the General Assembly Elections Act of 1919, which reaffirmed a franchise limited to propertied men, milestones include the introduction of voting by secret ballot between 1939 and 1946, universal adult male suffrage in 1959, women's suffrage in 1961, and the incremental abolition of plural voting between 1959 and 1969.
This book offers a legal-historical examination of the construction of property in the province of Córdoba, Argentina, at the end of the 19th century. The author analyzes the interaction of the civil codification, Argentina's federal structure, and the systems for the official surveying of land and registration of property. In this context, she focuses on the privatization of the territories belonging to indigenous communities in Córdoba province from the 1870s to the early 20th century.
This book examines the social construction of legal relations between people and things in Brazil during the 19th century through the analysis of court cases discussing dominion and possession over slaves and land. The chapters address topics such as the role of social recognition in situations of possession, the process of delegitimizing acts of land usage from indigenous peoples, dependent persons and women, and the widespread illegal acquisition of slaves and land