Party and Pressure Politics. By Dayton David Mckean. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 1949. Pp. VIII, 712. $4.75.)
In: American political science review, Band 43, Heft 6, S. 1280-1281
ISSN: 1537-5943
36 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American political science review, Band 43, Heft 6, S. 1280-1281
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: The Western political quarterly, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 300-301
ISSN: 1938-274X
In: American political science review, Band 42, Heft 5, S. 992-993
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 41, Heft 6, S. 1222-1224
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 158-160
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 552-554
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 33, Heft 5, S. 908-909
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 33, Heft 4, S. 697-699
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 28, Heft 2, S. 317-318
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: American political science review, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 63-65
ISSN: 1537-5943
An earlier note in the Review indicated the desirability of minority party activity in the interval between campaigns and appraised the organization and functioning of the publicity bureau of the Democratic national committee from June 1, 1929, until September 1,1930. During the period from September, 1930, to the convening of the Democratic national convention on June 27, 1932, the bureau continued, as a party agency, to criticise the policies of the Hoover administration and to assume, in a limited degree, the educational function of the minority party. In addition, it was necessary during the first session of the Seventy-second Congress to explain and justify the work of the Democratic House of Representatives.
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 473-474
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: National municipal review, Band 21, Heft 5, S. 312-318
In: American political science review, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 68-72
ISSN: 1537-5943
Observers of the American political system have long recognized the difficult position of the opposition party as an effective critic of the legislative and executive policies of the party in power, especially in the interval between campaigns. Our constitutional practices result in the nomination of "available" men for the presidency, and in the rather complete elimination of the defeated candidate from a position of acknowledged party leadership. The methods and traditions which govern and control the procedure of Congress are hardly adapted to produce party leaders who can speak authoritatively for the minority. It is rare that the party out of power is cohesive, united, and ready to present and support an alternative program. It is decidedly difficult, under normal conditions, to arouse public interest in the minority's position, save in the period which precedes an election. On the other hand, because of the great prestige attaching to the presidential office, and because of the elaborate methods of favorable publicity so highly developed by recent chief executives, the party in power is able to direct continuous attention to its policies and program.The question of effective minority opposition concerns chiefly the Democratic party, since it seems probable that it will remain, for the most part, in the position of an opposition party. The lack of funds adequately to finance campaigns and the relatively insignificant press support given to the Democracy are factors which accentuate the difficulty.
In: National municipal review, Band 13, Heft 4, S. 194-197