Biotechnology and Governance in Australia and Sweden: Path Dependency or Institutional Convergence?
In: Australian journal of political science: journal of the Australasian Political Studies Association, Band 38, Heft 1, S. 25-43
ISSN: 1363-030X
The development of new generic technologies occurs within traditional structures of industry-government interaction, but also unleashes a process of 'creative destruction' generating new institutional patterns. This article, focusing on biotechnology, compares policy processes & institutional arrangements in Australia & Sweden. The Swedish biotechnology sector displays a pattern of fragmentation & relatively weak state steering. Australia, by contrast, has implemented a set of comparatively coordinated regulatory & other measures to foster the growth of biotechnology. This observation contradicts the characterization of Sweden as a 'strong state' economy, & challenges the depiction of Australia as lacking in state steering capacity. The relative open-endedness of the search in these countries for a mode of regulation of biotechnology suggests that the role of the state in economic restructuring today is fundamentally distinct from that of earlier periods. 58 References. Adapted from the source document.