Suchergebnisse

France is often depicted as the model of assimilationist or republican integration in the international literature on immigration. However, rarely have surveys drilled down to provide individual responses from a double representative sample. In As French as Everyone Else?, Sylvain Brouard and Vincent Tiberj provide a comprehensive assessment of the state of integration in France and challenge the usual crisis of integration by systematically comparing the "new French" immigrants, as well as their children and grandchildren born in France, with a sample of the French general populatio

France is often depicted as the model of assimilationist or republican integration in the international literature on immigration. However, rarely have surveys drilled down to provide individual responses from a double representative sample. In As French as Everyone Else?, Sylvain Brouard and Vincent Tiberj provide a comprehensive assessment of the state of integration in France and challenge the usual crisis of integration by systematically comparing the "new French" immigrants, as well as their children and grandchildren born in France, with a sample of the French general populatio.

Cet article examine l'impact des crises liées à la pandémie de Covid-19 et au déclenchement de la guerre en Ukraine sur le vote pour Emmanuel Macron au premier tour de l'élection présidentielle de 2022. Pour cela, il met à l'épreuve empirique deux théories établies des conséquences électorales des crises internationales : le vote rétrospectif et l'effet de ralliement au drapeau. Au moyen de données panélisées, cette contribution démontre la pertinence de ces deux mécanismes dans le contexte français de 2022. Bien que la pandémie de Covid-19 ait débuté plus de deux ans avant l'élection présidentielle, l'évaluation des politiques de gestion sanitaire et économique de cette crise reste déterminante pour comprendre le succès du président sortant. De plus, celui-ci a bien bénéficié électoralement – mais dans une moindre mesure – d'un effet drapeau lié à la guerre en Ukraine.

AbstractAlthough executives in many democracies have constitutional powers to circumvent the majoritarian legislative process to make policy, political scientists know relatively little about whether and when ordinary people hold executives accountable for the process they use. To study this issue beyond the American presidency, we conduct a series of large survey experiments in France, where the institution of the confidence procedure puts the government in a strong position relative to parliament. Our experiments highlight that public evaluations of the executive reflect a fundamental trade‐off between policy and process. If they face significant opposition in the legislative process, executives either have to accept policy failure or risk punishment for the use of procedural force. People dislike both results, and the average popularity gain of using the confidence procedure over not delivering the policy is modest. Moreover, in some contexts, executives are strictly better off not legislating rather than applying force.