Dowry and Intrahousehold Bargaining: Evidence from China
In: The journal of human resources, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 25-46
ISSN: 1548-8004
255 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of human resources, Band 44, Heft 1, S. 25-46
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: World affairs: a journal of ideas and debate, Band 170, Heft 1, S. 33-36
ISSN: 0043-8200
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 759-789
ISSN: 1539-2988
In: The journal of economic history, Band 66, Heft 2, S. 528-529
ISSN: 1471-6372
In: Social science history: the official journal of the Social Science History Association, Band 30, Heft 3, S. 431-461
ISSN: 1527-8034
The origins and role of corporate landholding and land redistribution practices over arable land in seventeenth- to nineteenth-century Japan have posed a quandary for scholars. The most common forms are widely seen as means to spread the impact of flooding among villagers in districts that are considered to be at great risk from flood hazards. Such conclusions are often based on individual village studies. In contrast, this study takes a regional approach and tests the validity of this relationship using geographic information systems technology experimentally. This experiment reveals a variety of anomalies that, taken together, suggest that any link between natural hazard risk and the presence or absence of redistribution practices is more subtle than typical explanations assert.
In: The review of politics, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 375-377
ISSN: 1748-6858
In: The review of politics, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 375-376
ISSN: 0034-6705
In: Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 99-103
In: Child & adolescent social work journal, Band 7, Heft 4, S. 319-337
ISSN: 1573-2797
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 452-454
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 47, Heft 1, S. 87-88
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 617-640
ISSN: 2161-7953
No branch of international law has been so badly misunderstood and needlessly confused as that of the recognition of new states and new governments. Recognition has been the football of diplomats who have made it mean anything that suited their purpose. It has certainly been grossly abused as a weapon of diplomatic pressure and intervention. It has in many cases proved to be an insoluble puzzle to the courts whose decisions have been sometimes conflicting and confusing. It has been a plaything for the political scientists who have taken delight in posing abstract problems of a theoretical nature.
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 620-627
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 42, Heft 3, S. 745-746
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 104-104
ISSN: 2161-7953