Introduction: more rights and accountability but fewer remedies?
In: Journal of human rights, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 261-276
ISSN: 1475-4843
52 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of human rights, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 261-276
ISSN: 1475-4843
In: International peacekeeping, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 172-179
ISSN: 1743-906X
In: International peacekeeping, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 172-179
ISSN: 1353-3312
In: Comparative studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Band 22, Heft 1-2, S. 59-75
ISSN: 1548-226X
In: Human rights quarterly, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 799-821
ISSN: 1085-794X
In: Nationalities papers: the journal of nationalism and ethnicity, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 303-304
ISSN: 1465-3923
In: Civil wars, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 25-76
ISSN: 1743-968X
In: Peace review: peace, security & global change, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 395-402
ISSN: 1469-9982
In: Wadabagei: a journal of the Caribbean and its diaspora, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 1-47
ISSN: 1091-5753
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 799-821
ISSN: 0275-0392
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 799-821
ISSN: 0275-0392
In: Civil wars, Band 5, Heft 2, S. 25-76
ISSN: 1369-8249
This essay analyzes the largely political causes behind the incipient norm for enforcing human rights protection, what is often called 'collective humanitarian intervention,' that has emerged in the peace-making & peacekeeping missions in Haiti, Bosnia, & Kosovo. It does not take a legal approach to determining what is or should be this new international law. Rather, three political science paradigms are used to explain why Western states have adopted a natural law approach to humanitarian intervention, rather than defer to a consensus understanding of the text of the UN Charter's rules on the use of force. This new trend away from positivism is crucial because humanitarian intervention is likely to be the more frequent kind of war that most NATO states are likely to fight. NATO leaders did not undertake, indeed they probably tried to avoid, debates over the UN Charter & international jurisprudence. Yet, international law is based on how states behave. The natural law proclivities of NATO leaders, to the extent that they represent state policy, were unambiguously expressed when British Prime Minister Tony Blair called for defense of the 'values of civilization & justice.'. Adapted from the source document.
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 799-821
ISSN: 0275-0392
In: Human rights quarterly: a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 799-821
ISSN: 0275-0392
In: Peace review: the international quarterly of world peace, Band 14, Heft 4, S. 395-402
ISSN: 1040-2659