International Law and the History of Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict
In: Identifying the Enemy, S. 26-47
62 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Identifying the Enemy, S. 26-47
In: Identifying the Enemy, S. 48-92
In: Identifying the Enemy, S. 172-202
In: International legal materials: ILM, Band 53, Heft 5, S. 927-932
ISSN: 1930-6571
On March 27, 2014, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 68/262 on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The resolution was adopted in response to the March 16, 2014 referendum held in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and city of Sevastopol, and it affirmed the territorial integrity, unity, sovereignty, and political independence of Ukraine, calling on states to desist and refrain from actions that undermine the unity and territorial integrity of Ukraine.
In: RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTERNATIONAL LAW AND TERRORISM, Ben Saul, ed., Edward Elgar, UK, pp. 250-270, 2014
SSRN
In: APPLYING INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW IN JUDICIAL AND QUASI-JUDICIAL BODIES: INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC ASPECTS, Derek Jinks, Jackson N. Maogoto, Solon Solomon, ed., Springer, pp. 335-354, 2014
SSRN
In: Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/10
SSRN
In: Journal of international humanitarian legal studies, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 43-72
ISSN: 1878-1527
In the years following the adoption of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions in 1977, debate emerged regarding the extant lacunae in the international rules relating to armed conflict. It was argued that there were gaps in international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law with regards to so-called 'grey-zone conflicts' – armed conflicts that did not reach the minimum threshold of either Protocol II or Common Article 3. Therefore, it was proposed that a declaration outlining the minimum humanitarian standards applicable in all situations of violence and conflict be adopted. By 1990, this debate had crystallised around the Turku Declaration on Minimum Humanitarian Standards. However, progress on the declaration quickly stalled once discussion was moved to the United Nations. Since 1995, there have been nine reports by the Secretary-General on the question of fundamental standards of humanity to use the current terminology. Over the years, the scope and content the fundamental standards of humanity has become clearer, yet the adoption of a document on these fundamental standards is no more imminent than when the issue first moved to the United Nations. This article will therefore examine why and how this apparently vital piece of international policy has stalled.
In: Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 12/61
SSRN
Working paper
In: MONISM AND DUALISM, M. Novaković, ed., Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade; Institute of Comparative Law; Institute of International Politics and Economics: Belgrade, 2013
SSRN
In: Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/45
SSRN
Working paper