FAQ zur Gefährdungsbeurteilung Teil II: Gehört die Wirkungsprüfung zur GB?
In: Betriebliche Prävention: Arbeit, Gesundheit, Unfallversicherung, Heft 9
ISSN: 2365-7634
265 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Betriebliche Prävention: Arbeit, Gesundheit, Unfallversicherung, Heft 9
ISSN: 2365-7634
In: Betriebliche Prävention: Arbeit, Gesundheit, Unfallversicherung, Heft 7
ISSN: 2365-7634
In: Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen: ZIB, Band 24, Heft 1, S. 160-169
ISSN: 0946-7165
In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
"Capitalist Peace Theory: A Critical Appraisal" published on by Oxford University Press.
In: Zeitschrift für betriebliche Prävention und Unfallversicherung: BPUVZ, Heft 11
ISSN: 2193-3308
In: Zeitschrift für betriebliche Prävention und Unfallversicherung: BPUVZ, Heft 1
ISSN: 2193-3308
In: Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 309-330
In: Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: Studies in peace and conflict : ZeFKo, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 309-330
ISSN: 2192-1741
World Affairs Online
In: Political science research and methods: PSRM, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 153-161
ISSN: 2049-8489
In: Zeitschrift für betriebliche Prävention und Unfallversicherung: BPUVZ, Heft 6
ISSN: 2193-3308
In: Journal of peace research, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 173-183
ISSN: 0022-3433
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of peace research, Band 51, Heft 2
ISSN: 1460-3578
The security externalities of globalization and capitalism continue to play an influential role in peace research. Typical contributions to these interrelated areas of scientific inquiry address the hope that the external openness (commercial liberalism) and the internal freedom of an economy (capitalist peace) pacify interstate as well as intrastate relations. I claim, despite the empirical support both theses have received, that they face considerable analytical hurdles. Commercial liberalism has, on a theoretical level, not yet moved much beyond the opportunity cost arguments that enlightenment philosophers first advanced more than 200 years ago. The capitalist peace research program similarly does not offer clear micro-level mechanisms explaining why the interactions between economic agents and political decisionmakers should be more peaceful in capitalist than in state-dominated economies. Drawing on the political economy literature, I argue that economic liberalism should distinguish between level- and change-effects of both globalization and capitalism and that thinking in analogies between domestic and interstate peace has prevented the field from making analytical headway. Both literatures will only profit from the advent of 'big data' in the case that the field addresses the theoretical challenges upfront. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.]
In: Journal of peace research, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 173-183
ISSN: 1460-3578
The security externalities of globalization and capitalism continue to play an influential role in peace research. Typical contributions to these interrelated areas of scientific inquiry address the hope that the external openness (commercial liberalism) and the internal freedom of an economy (capitalist peace) pacify interstate as well as intrastate relations. I claim, despite the empirical support both theses have received, that they face considerable analytical hurdles. Commercial liberalism has, on a theoretical level, not yet moved much beyond the opportunity cost arguments that enlightenment philosophers first advanced more than 200 years ago. The capitalist peace research program similarly does not offer clear micro-level mechanisms explaining why the interactions between economic agents and political decisionmakers should be more peaceful in capitalist than in state-dominated economies. Drawing on the political economy literature, I argue that economic liberalism should distinguish between level- and change-effects of both globalization and capitalism and that thinking in analogies between domestic and interstate peace has prevented the field from making analytical headway. Both literatures will only profit from the advent of 'big data' in the case that the field addresses the theoretical challenges upfront.
SSRN
Working paper
In: European political science: EPS, Band 10, Heft 3, S. 337-345
ISSN: 1682-0983