Suchergebnisse

The article considers environmental law policy as a component, an independent type of national legal policy, as well as state and sectoral environmental policy. The existence of correlative, mutual influence of ecological and legal doctrine on formation of the corresponding policy is proved. It is substantiated that the ecological and legal legal doctrine significantly influences the current state of the state ecological policy (and this influence is mutual), formation of the ecological legislation and integration of Ukraine into the European legal space. It was stated that Ukraine first of all needs to intensify law-making, modernize the provisions of the environmental and legal doctrine, based on the concepts of which will be revised, updated provisions of public policy, legal understanding, and hence law enforcement. Further institutionalization of the basic provisions of the ecological and legal doctrine in the legislation becomes a necessary condition for the further development of law-making and statehood. It is emphasized that the use of environmental and legal doctrine will speed up the lawmaking process, in particular due to the adaptation of regulations to European standards; formulate legislative definitions that will gradually become an important part of environmental regulations; develop a "road map" for the development of environmental policy and legislation, etc. It is emphasized that the current state of the legal system requires a fuller use of the lawmaking potential of environmental law doctrine and the implementation of its main functions – stabilizing, guiding, heuristic, rule-making, evaluative and prognostic. Therefore, it is expedient to apply the ecological and legal doctrine as a methodological platform of the ecological and legal policy. The necessity of developing concepts of systematization of the ecological legislation, and also legal policy is proved.

The science of environmental law in modern Ukraine occupies an important place in human public life and has various levels: basic, methodological, philosophical and legal, general theoretical, industrytheoretical and applied. In the context of the proposed study, environmental science is considered at the fundamental level. It must be understood as a system of knowledge and ideas about environmental law and its constituent institutions (ownership of natural resources, environmental management rights, environmental security law, environmental legal protection, legal responsibility for environmental violations, legal climate protection, etc.), the ultimate goal of which is the development of the concept of environmental law and legislation, the study of relevant theoretical and methodological problems of this branch of law and legislation, the formation of its conceptual apparatus, scientific categories used by the legislator and law enforcement agencies, analysis of environmental policy and the role of the state in the implementation of the environmental function. The subject of environmental law science includes not only the norms and institutions of this branch of law, but also studies of environmental and legal relations regulated by other branches of legislation (environmental management, environmental tax, fee for the special use of natural resources, environmental insurance and auditing, international and European environmental community, etc.), their specificity, the reasons for the emergence, functioning and termination.

Taking into account the new dangerous challenges to the modern international legal order and security system, politicians and scholars are faced with the question of the timeliness and validity of the revision of established conceptual approaches to the construction of international and European security architecture. Since the beginning of the XXI century there are more and more calls to significantly update the current international order, its institutions, norms and rules, which emerged after 1945 (especially the UN Security Council). In this regard, the study of the evolution of previous systems of international relations and security systems based on them (in particular the Vienna system) is relevant and of a practical significance. Regarding the «European Concert» as a core of the Viennese architecture of European security (1815–1914) there is a general ambiguous attitude in historiography, which prevents it from being properly assessed, as well as to trace the evolution of the Vienna system, its relationship with subsequent international systems, to assess the possibility of using its elements to design future international systems. It determines the attention caused by the formation, development and decline of the Vienna system. One of the concepts that require to be reconsidered in this context is the «balance of power», the theoretical foundations of which were mainly formed during the Vienna system. Over time, the content of the concept of «balance of power» changed markedly and was supplemented with new elements, which caused the conceptual ambiguity of the term. As a result of the development of international relations, changes in approaches to global and regional security, there is a need for a critical analysis of the «balance of power», its new conceptual models that explain the behavior of world politics' subjects.

the article deals with individual issues of the procedure for assigning and directly building the psychological profile. Provided reasoned provisions for the distinction between such concepts as "the conclusion of a specialist" and "expert's opinion", which are based on the norms of the existing criminal procedural legislation and the provisions of other normative acts of Ukraine regarding the recognition of their evidentiary status. The author identifies two stages in the process of constructing the psychological profile of an unknown criminal: 1) analytical and 2) synthetic. Based on the above provisions, the researcher reveals the nature and structure of the expert's conclusion regarding the psychological profile of the person of the unknown criminal. ; в статье рассмотрены отдельные вопросы процедуры назначения и непосредственно процесса построения психологического профиля. Аргументированы положения относительно разграничения понятий «заключение специалиста» и «заключение эксперта», в основе которых лежат нормы действующего уголовного процессуального законодательства и положения других нормативных актов Украины относительно признания их доказательного статуса. Автором выделены два этапа процесса построения психологического профиля личности неизвестного преступника: 1) аналитический и 2) синтетический. Исходя из приведенных положений, исследователем раскрыты сущность и структура заключения специалиста относительно психологического профиля личности неизвестного преступника. ; у статті розглянуто окремі питання процедури призначення та безпосередньо процесу побудови психологічного профілю. Наведено аргументовані положення щодо проведення розмежування між поняттями «висновок спеціаліста» та «висновок експерта», в основу яких покладено норми чинного кримінального процесуального законодавства, положення інших нормативних актів України стовно визнання їх доказового статусу. Автором виокремлено два етапи процесу побудови психологічного профілю особи невідомого злочинця: 1) аналітичний та 2)синтетичний. Виходячи із наведених положень дослідник розкрив сутність та структуру висновку спеціаліста щодо психологічного профілю особи невідомого злочинця.

The influence of globalization and integration processes on the research of the issues of environmental law and legislation is examined. Environmental legal science is considered to be a system of knowledge and ideas on environmental law and its different institutions aimed at developing the environmental law doctrine, analyzing its theoretical and methodological issues, forming the conceptual apparatus and scientific categories for environmental legislation, studying the role of the state in the implementation of ecological functions and environmental policy