Suchergebnisse

Every year the Australian government invests large sums of money in the research sector. To maximise returns on this investment, it is important that research findings are open, accessible and clearly communicated to relevant stakeholders. Best practice promotes rigorous science, and research that is open, engaging and reproducible. Nonetheless, It is still possible for gaps to exist between research outputs (code/data/results) and consumers of research (policy makers/other researchers/the general public). This is the Data Gap. Bridging the Data Gap requires formal, reproducible workflows, including reproducible computational environments, and analysis platforms that allow researchers to share their code, data and findings in an open and engaging format. We refer to these environments as interactive analysis platforms. This project focusses on the following questions: • Are Australian researchers currently using interactive analysis platforms? • What tools are they using? • How can the ARDC support Australian researchers to use these platforms?

Every year the Australian government invests large sums of money in the research sector. To maximise returns on this investment, it is important that research findings are open, accessible and clearly communicated to relevant stakeholders. Best practice promotes rigorous science, and research that is open, engaging and reproducible. Nonetheless, It is still possible for gaps to exist between research outputs (code/data/results) and consumers of research (policy makers/other researchers/the general public). This is the Data Gap. Bridging the Data Gap requires formal, reproducible workflows, including reproducible computational environments, and analysis platforms that allow researchers to share their code, data and findings in an open and engaging format. We refer to these environments as interactive analysis platforms. This project focusses on the following questions: • Are Australian researchers currently using interactive analysis platforms? • What tools are they using? • How can the ARDC support Australian researchers to use these platforms?

Every year the Australian government invests large sums of money in the research sector. To maximise returns on this investment, it is important that research findings are open, accessible and clearly communicated to relevant stakeholders. Best practice promotes rigorous science, and research that is open, engaging and reproducible. Nonetheless, It is still possible for gaps to exist between research outputs (code/data/results) and consumers of research (policy makers/other researchers/the general public). This is the Data Gap. Bridging the Data Gap requires formal, reproducible workflows, including reproducible computational environments, and analysis platforms that allow researchers to share their code, data and findings in an open and engaging format. We refer to these environments as interactive analysis platforms. This project focusses on the following questions: • Are Australian researchers currently using interactive analysis platforms? • What tools are they using? • How can the ARDC support Australian researchers to use these platforms?

This article deals with two aspects of psychoanalytic history. The first is the history of ideas, specifically the notions of a one- and two-person psychology that are in such wide use today. Second, the authors attend, much more critically, to a disturbance of memory (repeated distortion, omission, selective representation, and misrepresentation) that has accompanied scholarly discussion of these ideas for the past 50 years. Finally, the authors attempt to restore the original meaning of the person-psychology concept and illustrate its relevance for contemporary psychoanalytic debate.