Dealing with Dictators: Westphalian and American Strategies
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 51-65
ISSN: 1470-482X
94 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International relations of the Asia-Pacific: a journal of the Japan Association of International Relations, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 51-65
ISSN: 1470-482X
In: Japanese journal of political science, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 157-172
ISSN: 1474-0060
In: Međunarodne studije: časopis za međunarodne odnose, vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju, Band 1, Heft yearbook, S. 383-406
ISSN: 1332-4756
In: Japanese journal of political science, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 157-172
ISSN: 1468-1099
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 114, Heft 1, S. 158-159
ISSN: 1538-165X
In: Review of International Studies, Band 24, Heft 5, S. 17-46
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 24, Specia, Heft (December), S. 17
ISSN: 0260-2105
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 41, Supple, S. 275
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
In: International affairs, Band 72, Heft 4, S. 799-799
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International political science review: IPSR = Revue internationale de science politique : RISP, Band 16, Heft 4, S. Dangers of our time, S. 319-339
ISSN: 0192-5121
World Affairs Online
In: American political science review, Band 87, Heft 4, S. 1054-1055
ISSN: 1537-5943
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 401-408
ISSN: 1469-9044
Contemporary theorists of international politics do not see the world in the same ways nor do they agree on what is important to know, or how to know it. Disagreements are partly due to the increasing complexity of the world, but also derive from the development of many different viewing points. Some are geographic and cultural (Americans often view the world differently than, say, Japanese), but other perspectives come from different epistemological starting points and from different assumptions as to what constitutes reliable or useful knowledge, and how to create it. Debates in the 1960s revolved around problems of methodology. Today, we see in addition arguments over metaphysics, the purposes of theoretical activity (understanding versus praxis, for example), and a whole host of other divisive questions.
In: Review of international studies: RIS, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 401
ISSN: 0260-2105
In: The Political Economy of Foreign Policy in Southeast Asia, S. 9-20
In: International Studies Quarterly, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 255