Introduction
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 102, p. 411-412
ISSN: 2169-1118
47 results
Sort by:
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Volume 102, p. 411-412
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: European journal of international law, Volume 15, Issue 4, p. 813-838
ISSN: 0938-5428
World Affairs Online
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Volume 9, Issue 4, p. 441-458
ISSN: 1942-6720
In: Global governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations, Volume 9, Issue 4, p. 441-458
ISSN: 2468-0958, 1075-2846
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of international law, Volume 14, Issue 3, p. 437-480
ISSN: 0938-5428
World Affairs Online
In: Power in Global Governance, p. 185-204
From 1960 to 1990, islands across the Pacific gained independence or self-government. In the years following this, Ian Johnstone and Michael Powles interviewed the Pacific people in key leadership positions in the lead-up to and achievement of independence, many of whom became well-known in the Pacific and more widely. This book presents a nation-by-nation history of this change from being colonial subjects to citizens of Pacific nations from the point of view of the leaders involved. Accompanied by maps, photographs and background information about the Pacific nations, the book explores
In: Global policy: gp, Volume 13, Issue 4, p. 563-570
ISSN: 1758-5899
AbstractAs the range of actors, issues and levels of negotiation at the COP26 meeting in Glasgow demonstrates, the defining feature of global governance today is pluralism. Geopolitics, including swings in US global leadership and surging US–China competition, are part of the picture, but do not adequately explain the complexity of contemporary multilateralism. Deeper, systemic forces are at work – the birth pains of a more plural global system. This article identifies and examines four dimensions of pluralism: multipolarity, multiple issues, multi‐level governance, and multiple stakeholders. The effect is that all states – including middle and small states – must be more active, more agile, more self‐reliant, more willing to lead, and more oriented towards issues than ideology. The article illustrates the four dimensions through reviews of multilateral responses to COVID‐19, cyber attacks, and mass migration, before asking how states and non‐state actors can effectively manage a more plural system of governance. Three capacities for success are discussed: to act early and decisively by finding partners and fora for success; to embrace adhocracy internally and externally; and to rebalance effectiveness and trust through greater technocratic expertise, transboundary scientific cooperation, and a more inclusive diplomacy.
In: International peacekeeping, Volume 15, Issue 1, p. 1-17
ISSN: 1743-906X
In: International peacekeeping, Volume 15, Issue 1, p. 1-17
ISSN: 1353-3312
World Affairs Online
In: International peacekeeping, Volume 15, Issue 1, p. 1-17
ISSN: 1353-3312
In: Études internationales: revue trimestrielle, Volume 26, Issue 1, p. 187
ISSN: 0014-2123
In: Oxford scholarly authorities on international law
In: Oxford Handbooks