EPILOGUE – From Europe 2020 to the TSCG and National Solvit-Centres
In: Towards an Effective European Single Market, S. 149-156
99 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Towards an Effective European Single Market, S. 149-156
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 511-511
ISSN: 1477-2280
In: Journal of European integration, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 511-512
ISSN: 0703-6337
In: Policy & politics, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 261-281
ISSN: 1470-8442
Based on determinants of the duration of national policy making derived from large-scale national transposition records in nine member states, this paper demonstrates that a mixed-method approach, including the so-called fuzzy set technique, can shed helpful light on scholarly findings of the European Union implementation literature. Whereas regression analysis is concerned more with the 'effects of a cause', the diversity-oriented fuzzy set method allows for asking under which assumptions a given causal factor might be necessary for the outcome. This paper also identifies four conditions that are usually necessary for the timeliness of legally, administratively and politically motivated national transposition processes.
International audience ; This study supplements extant literature on implementation in the European Union (EU). The quantitative analysis, which covers the EU transport acquis, reveals five main findings. First, the EU has a transposition deficit in this area, with almost 70% of all national legal instruments causing problems. Second, transposition delay is multifaceted. The results provide strong support for the assertion that distinguishing between the outcomes of the transposition process (on time, short delay or long delay) is a useful method of investigation. Third, factors specific to European directives (level of discretion and transposition deadline) and domestic-level factors (national transposition package and number of veto players) have different effects on the length of delay. Furthermore, the timing of general elections in member states as well as policy (sub)sector-related accidents influence the timeliness of national transposition processes.
BASE
In: EIPASCOPE: bulletin, Heft 2, S. 21-26
In: European Union politics: EUP, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 115-143
ISSN: 1741-2757
This study supplements extant literature on implementation in the European Union (EU). The quantitative analysis, which covers the EU transport acquis, reveals five main findings. First, the EU has a transposition deficit in this area, with almost 70% of all national legal instruments causing problems. Second, transposition delay is multifaceted. The results provide strong support for the assertion that distinguishing between the outcomes of the transposition process (on time, short delay or long delay) is a useful method of investigation. Third, factors specific to European directives (level of discretion and transposition deadline) and domestic-level factors (national transposition package and number of veto players) have different effects on the length of delay. Furthermore, the timing of general elections in member states as well as policy (sub)sector-related accidents influence the timeliness of national transposition processes.
In: Policy & politics: advancing knowledge in public and social policy, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 261-282
ISSN: 0305-5736
In: European Union politics: EUP, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 115-144
ISSN: 1465-1165
In: Die politische Ôkonomie des EU-Entscheidungs prozesses, S. 163-182
In: European Union Politics, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 115-143
This study supplements extant literature on implementation in the European Union (EU). The quantitative analysis, which covers the EU transport acquis, reveals five main findings. First, the EU has a transposition deficit in this area, with almost 70% of all national legal instruments causing problems. Second, transposition delay is multifaceted. The results provide strong support for the assertion that distinguishing between the outcomes of the transposition process (on time, short delay or long delay) is a useful method of investigation. Third, factors specific to European directives (level of discretion and transposition deadline) and domestic-level factors (national transposition package and number of veto players) have different effects on the length of delay. Furthermore, the timing of general elections in member states as well as policy (sub)sector-related accidents influence the timeliness of national transposition processes.
In: Journal of European integration: Revue d'intégration européenne, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 425-445
ISSN: 1477-2280
In: Journal of European integration, Band 29, Heft 4, S. 425-445
ISSN: 0703-6337
World Affairs Online
In: EIPASCOPE: bulletin, Heft 3, S. 27-34