Suchergebnisse

This paper assesses the livelihood strategies of the forcibly displaced Myanmar nationals encamped in Cox's Bazar district of Bangladesh. Although the predominant source of livelihood of the encamped Rohingya households is supposed to be various sources of assistance and transfer receipts, almost 76 per cent of them report positive income from various sources, including farm activities, enterprises, labour market, remittance, and non-food transfers, despite restrictions on mobility and income generation through employment. While a few of the sources dampen income inequality, others exacerbate it. Similarly, while several factors facilitate participation in income generation both at the extensive and intensive margins, a few others appear to hinder the process. Both the diversity and the level of income appear to be higher for households in the old wave (arrived before 25 August 2017) compared to that in the new wave (arrived after 25 August 2017), possibly due to better integration and adaptation to the local environment and context. The encamped Rohingya households with supplementary earned income and receipts rather than exclusively depending on WFP assistance enjoy relatively better well-being, at least in terms of higher expenditure and dietary diversity. The evidence on the impact of earned income and receipts on household well-being indicators reinforces their appeal for the right to work.

In examining the phrase "فأنساه الشّیطان ذکر ربّه " as one of the Mutashābihat (i.e. allegorical phrases) of the Holy Qur'an, there are two views that one related the oblivion to the remembrance of God and attributed it to the Prophet Yūsuf (pbuh) and knows its reason as Satan's influence on the Prophet; and another, attributes oblivion to the king's butler who forgot the Yūsuf completely. After examining the Muḥkamat (i.e. decisive), which indicates that Satan had no way to have an influence on him. On the other hand, the evidences in the Muḥkamat of the Prophet Yūsuf (pbuh) also showed that he was one of the sincere and benefactor Prophets (pbuh), and possessed a divine commandment and knowledge that caused his infallibility. In the end it was proved that the reason for the prolongation of the prison of the Prophet Yūsuf that has come in the style of the verse was not his sin or error, but it was a divine tradition for testing the people.

ABSTRACT Criminal penalties in the Act No. 51 of 1960 provided for in Article 6 paragraph (1) the maximum amount of these fines is Rp 5,000. Because given the high land prices at this time, of course, the nominal amount of the fine is not in accordance with the development of the present value of the rupiah. Overcoming the Supreme Court issued Perma No. 2 of 2012 to adjust the penalties that exist in the Criminal Code and the fine adjustments associated with Act No. 51 of 1960. Formulation of the problems are: 1) What are the links between criminal penalties of Law No. 51 of 1960 with Perma No. 2 of 2012 in case No. 01 / Pid.C / 2016 / PN-LBS? 2) How does the application of criminal penalties contained in the law No. 51 of 1960, which is associated with Perma No. 2 of 2012 in case No. 01 / Pid.C / 2016 / PN-LBS ?. The research approach is yuridis normative. Source of data: 1) the primary legal materials, 2) secondary law and 3) tertiary legal materials. Data collection techniques: document study. The conclusions of research are: 1) The relation is between both forms of legislation can be seen from the example that is decided by the judge ruling in which the judge found rightly too Act No. 51 of 1960 also increased in value. 2) The application of criminal penalties by linking the Act No. 51 of 1960, which refers to the Perma No. 2 of 2012.Keywords: application, criminal, fines, soil.

The quantification of landlessness is a formidable task.
Conceptual ambiguities involved in the classification of landlessness
and data limitations compound the difficulties in the estimation.
Landlessness, which is an elusive concept, tends to acquire
interpretations which vary with the objectives, context and estimation
procedures adopted in different research endeavours. The denotation and
connotation of the concept of landlessness, the population of interest
(or at risk) and the objectives of measurement therefore need to be
spell out very clearly for a meaningful and policy-relevant exercise.
Identification of the state of landlessness using the criterion of
ownership and access to land, has often been made. While the 'ownership'
may be clear in certain contexts, that of 'access' needs further
explanations in terms of the nature, extent and type of access. A
related question, is the demarcation of the population or its subset
whose landlessness is to be estimated: are all the inhabitants of an
area or the ones who primarily depend on land for their livelihood be
regarded as the relevant population. The dependence on land needs to be
further specified whether the person is engaged in agricultural
operations as worker or not.