Local market socialism: Local corporatism in action in rural China
In: Theory and society: renewal and critique in social theory, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 301-354
ISSN: 1573-7853
88 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Theory and society: renewal and critique in social theory, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 301-354
ISSN: 1573-7853
In: Theory and society: renewal and critique in social theory, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 301-354
ISSN: 0304-2421
In: Public opinion quarterly: journal of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 562-573
ISSN: 0033-362X
See SA F3076/ASA/1971/0745.
In: The public opinion quarterly: POQ, Band 38, Heft 4, S. 562
ISSN: 1537-5331
In: Journalism quarterly, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 33-61
In: Journalism quarterly: JQ ; devoted to research in journalism and mass communication, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 33-40
ISSN: 0196-3031, 0022-5533
In: East Meets West, S. 35-70
In: Chinese Capitalisms, S. 13-62
In: The international journal of social psychiatry, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 176-187
ISSN: 1741-2854
A sample of Chinese-Americans in the District of Columbia was drawn to examine the relationship between the locus of control, the personality factor, and two indices of symptoms of psychological distress. The findings indicated that the externals scored higher on symptomatology than did the internals. A multivariate analysis further compared the predictive utility of locus of control with other determinants of psychiatric symptoms, i.e., sex, marital status, SES, kinship and friendship tie, and amount of life change. The evidence showed that locus of control is an important determinant of Chinese-Americans' symptomatology. It accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in the two indices of psychological distress than did the other independent variables.
The volume brings together some of the leading scholars around the world working on social capital to study how individuals and groups access and use their social relations and social connections to do better in society in order to achieve their goals.
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
In: Contemporary Accounting Research, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: China political economy, Band 3, Heft 1, S. 3-17
ISSN: 2516-1652
PurposeThe development of China's foreign exchange market and the reform of Chinese yuan (hereinafter "CNY") exchange rate are closely linked with each other. Their respective journey through the past 70 years can both be divided into three historical periods; as follows: China's foreign exchange market underwent a difficult exploration period, a formation and development period and an innovative development period; in the meanwhile, the formation mechanism of CNY exchange rate also witnessed three periods marked successively by a single exchange rate system with administrative pricing, an explorative formation mechanism of CNY exchange rate and a reformed, marketized CNY exchange rate mechanism.Design/methodology/approachIn the present world, the development of almost every country is closely linked to the international community, which is the result of the heterogeneity in system, market, humanity and history, in addition to the differences in natural resource endowments and the diversity in technology, administration, information, experience and diplomacy. International economic exchanges require foreign exchange, which gives rise to the existence and development of the foreign exchange market.FindingsThe 70-year history of China's foreign exchange market has proven the need to continue safeguarding national sovereignty and interests of the people, stick to the general direction of serving economic development, adhere to the strategy of steadily and orderly promoting the construction of the foreign exchange market, keep on making innovation in monetary policy operation and unbendingly stay away from any systemic financial risks.Originality/valueDuring the 70-year history of the new China, as an indispensable economic resource in China's economic development, the foreign exchange mechanism bolstered each stage of economic development and was always an important manifestation of China's economic sovereignty. It is argued that during the 30-year planned economy that preceded reform and opening-up, China pursued a closed-door policy with few international economic exchanges. The subtext of such argument is that China did not have (or hardly had much of) a foreign exchange mechanism during this period, which is clearly in conflict with historical evidence. In fact, although China did not have an open foreign exchange market before the reform and opening-up, it had a clear foreign exchange management system and exchange rate system.
In: Forthcoming at European Accounting Review
SSRN
Working paper