Suchergebnisse

The subject of research is the theoretical aspects of the development of shadow autonomous power structure as a phenomenon of incomplete modernization in the information age, the patterns of its curvature, growth, shadow hybrid influences, accelerating the development of criminal macro– mechanisms of shadow redistribution of property and power, as inhibiting development factors. The purpose of the study is to further discursive study of the essence and causal complex of the shadow aspects of power processes, including the shadow elite among the multitude of shadow parallel spaces as factors enhancing innovation and criminogenic phenomena in the power sphere – the system of inhibiting, retrograde development factors. Methods of research. The paper uses a set of scientific methods and approaches, including systemic, historical, logical, which allowed to ensure the conceptual unity and effectiveness of the research. Results of the work. The article substantiates the need for a systemic study of the processes of shadowing of power, on which the development of parallel shadow reality is most significant, modern dangers of the development of the «top» of shadow power processes are investigated as inhibiting factors of social development. Application of results. The system of sciences from the field of government, economic security, law, a wide range of problems of socio–economic sciences from the study of dysfunctional development. Conclusions. The main conclusions of the study can be reduced to the formulation: 1) among the polysystems of modern power parallel realities, the special information destructive place is occupied by the shadow information parallel reality – the shadow autonomous power parallel para–society; 2) syncretism (hybridization) of power and oligarchic business is a powerful sectoral macro–social shadow groupings of parallel realities that monopolize the state–power resource in favor of the clan– power dominant structure; 3) the shadow power space acquires the features of a hybrid conflict; 4) in ...

The subject of progress is the theoretical aspects of progress of ownership of a system of galvanic social and economic progress, effective reform of suspension of business activities. The purpose of the study is to determine the content of power shadow processes of antimodernization development. Methods of research. A set of scientific methods and approaches, including systematic, historical, logical, was applied in the work, which made it possible to provide the conceptual unity of the research. Results of the work. The article substantiates the need to counteract the systematic shadowing of power relations, overcoming the development of processes of accelerated development of «autonomous» shadow power as the main shadowing factor of reform. Application of results. The system of sciences from the field of public administration, a wide range of socio–economic sciences with problems of dysfunctional development. Conclusions. The main results of the study and its theoretical results can be summarized as follows: 1) the initial megaproblem of studying the shadowing power mechanisms is the problem of power dysfunctions in Ukraine as a system of slowing down socio–economic progress, effective reform of social relations, power; 2) one of the fundamental aspects of the study is the conclusion that the construction of the theory of shadowing power as a base position requires the development of a special trend, attractor of antimodernization development inherent in the relations of shadowing power, power reform.

The subject of research is the theoretical aspects of the development of a shadow «autonomous» power space as a phenomenon of anti–modernization, a system of inhibition of reform, the laws of its curvature, growth, acceleration of the macromechanisms of the shadow redistribution of property and power instead of real reforms. The purpose of the study is a further discursive study of the causal complex of shadow aspects of power processes, including in the context of pseudo–modernization and quasi–reform as factors in enhancing shadow–criminogenic phenomena in the power sphere. Methods of research. The paper uses a set of scientific methods and approaches, including systemic, historical, logical, which allowed to ensure the conceptual unity and effectiveness of the research. Results of the work. The article substantiates the need for a systematic study of the processes of shadowing power, overcoming the development of processes of expansion of the «autonomous» shadow power as the main shadowing anti–reformist factor. Application of results. The system of sciences from the field of government, economic security, law, a wide range of problems of socio–economic sciences from the study of dysfunctional development. Conclusions. The main findings of the study can be reduced to the following: 1) among the polysystems of modern power shadow realities, a «destructive» shadow power occupies a special destructive anti–reformist place; 2) the study of the historical logic of reforms in Russia, the USSR and modern Ukraine testifies to them, as a system, pseudo–modernization, pseudo–effective shadow nature with respect to indigenous national interests, with the tasks, first of all, of strengthening their own power, realizing power parasitic interests, serving the interests of ruling clans dominant countries; 3) effective reformist activity of the authorities requires a systematic, targeted update of training for the modern ruling class with high professional qualities and deep patriotic convictions.