Suchergebnisse

There are two aspects of the relation between government and interest groups which are of primary significance for the political scientist. One is the realistic approach to the study of interest groups, which gives attention to the demands of groups, their pressure on government, and the ways government yields to or tries to accommodate their conflicting demands. The other is the idealist tradition that the purpose of the state is the common weal, which has been expressed diversely, as for example, in the concepts of salus populi suprema lex and "public office is a public trust." If these two were necessarily in conflict, we should have to choose between ethical nihilism and utopianism. This paper moves from the assumptions that realism and idealism both have a place in the study of political science, today as in ancient tradition, and that in the study of the particular problem of government control of the economy, analysis of the upward impact of interest pressures and their accommodation through government policies should be supplemented by a search for the best means of strengthening the impact of the concept of the common weal in the decision-making process.

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Foreword -- Preface -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Duality, Change, and Stabilization -- 3. The Johnson White House: An Overview -- 4. Johnson's Management Style -- 5. Developing the Legislative Program -- 6. Developing Executive Policy -- 7. Directing the Executive Branch -- 8. Representing the President -- 9. Conclusion -- Appendix. The White House: Comments on Size and Service Functions -- Notes -- Index