The Dialectics of Globalization: Whose Globalization Is It Anyway?
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 40, Supple, S. 266
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
26 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 40, Supple, S. 266
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 266
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
In: Third world quarterly, Band 45, Heft 6, S. 1035-1050
ISSN: 1360-2241
In: Cambridge review of international affairs, Band 36, Heft 3, S. 372-390
ISSN: 1474-449X
Politics, International Relations, Sociology, Asian Studies, Asian Politics and Law, Development, Migration, Ethnicity and Identity, General
BASE
In: Mershon International Studies Review, Band 40, Heft 2, S. 266
Politics, International Relations, Sociology, Asian Studies, Asian Politics and Law, Development, Migration, Ethnicity and Identity, General
In: Cambridge review of international affairs, Band 32, Heft 4, S. 521-540
ISSN: 1474-449X
In: Political science, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 86
ISSN: 0112-8760, 0032-3187
In: Democratic theory: an interdisciplinary journal, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 82-93
ISSN: 2332-8908
Liberal democracies often include rights of participation, guarantees of protection, and policies that privilege model citizens within a bounded territory. Notwithstanding claims of universal equality for "humanity," they achieve these goals by epistemically elevating certain traits of identity above "others," sustaining colonial biases that continue to favor whoever is regarded more "human." The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these fault lines, unveiling once more the often-hidden prevalence of inequalities that are based on race, gender, class, ethnicity, and other axes of power and their overlaps. Decolonial theories and practices analyze these othering tendencies and inequalities while also highlighting how sites of suffering sometimes become locations of solidarity and agency, which uncover often-erased alternatives and lessons.
In: International studies perspectives: ISP, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 25-64
ISSN: 1528-3585
AbstractDifference, a central concern to the study of international relations (IR), has not had its ontological foundations adequately disrupted. This forum explores how existential assumptions rooted in relational logics provide a significantly distinct set of tools that drive us to re-orient how we perceive, interpret, and engage both similarity and difference. Taking their cues from cosmological commitments originating in the Andes, South Asia, East Asia, and the Middle East, the six contributions explore how our existential assumptions affect the ways in which we deal with difference as theorists, researchers, and teachers. This initial conversation pinpoints key content and foci of future relational work in IR.