Suchergebnisse

Compares the normative conception of global governance as defined by panarchy -- the rule of all by all for all -- to the democratization urged by UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali (1995) & the control stressed by James N. Rosenau (1995). Panarchy is offered as a term to suggest normative standards by which systems of governance can be assessed while recognizing that no such state of governance exists, even on a small scale, today. Boutros-Ghali's vision of democracy is similar to panarchy with the exception that the globalized society still embodies substate dissident movements that contribute to the discomfiture of governments. Rosenau, in contrast, deemphasizes formal international institutions while stressing stability & order over democracy. M. Greenberg