Introduction and Context
In: Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, Band 110, S. 63-64
ISSN: 2169-1118
135 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, Band 110, S. 63-64
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 109, S. 322-326
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Regulation & governance, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 1-15
ISSN: 1748-5991
AbstractThe World Trade Organization (WTO) arguably shapes regulatory governance in more countries to a greater extent than any other international organization. This article provides a new framework for assessing the broader transnational regulatory implications of the WTO as part of a transnational legal order (TLO) in terms of four dimensions of regulatory change that permeate the state: (i) changes in the boundary between the market and the state (involving concomitantly market liberalization and growth of the administrative state); (ii) changes in the relative authority of institutions within the state (promoting bureaucratized and judicialized governance); (iii) changes in professional expertise engaging with state regulation (such as the role of lawyers); and (iv) changes in normative frames and accountability mechanisms for national regulation (which are trade liberal and transnational in scope). In practice, these four dimensions of change interact and build on each other. The article presents what we know to date and a framework for conducting further study of such transnational legal ordering.
In: ASIL Proceedings 2014 (Forthcoming)
SSRN
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 108, S. 369-370
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: Regulation & Governance, Band 9, Heft No.1, S. 1-15
SSRN
In: American journal of international law, Band 107, Heft 1, S. 192-198
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 107, Heft 1, S. 192-199
ISSN: 2161-7953
In a Mexican challenge against U.S. criteria for labeling tuna products as "dolphin-safe," the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO), on May 16, 2012, held against the United States while reversing various findings of the panel. The case was one of three WTO Appellate Body decisions issued in 2012 that interpreted and applied the key substantive provisions of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement or TBT) for the first time. Systemically, the decision is important for its interpretation of the TBT Agreement's substantive obligations, the types of labeling that fall within the scope of the Agreement, the legitimacy of labeling based on foreign process and production methods (PPMs), and the relation of other international law to WTO law.
In: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 23 (2012)
SSRN
In: American Journal of International Law, Issue 1, 2013
SSRN
In: European journal of international law, Band 23, Heft 2, S. 565-582
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: European journal of international law, Band 23, Heft 3, S. 669-693
ISSN: 1464-3596
In: Wisconsin Law Review, No.2, 2013, pp.607-628
SSRN
In: European Journal of International Law, Vol. 23 (2012)
SSRN
Working paper
In: Socioeconomic Review, Band 9, Heft 71, S. 394
SSRN
Working paper