Suchergebnisse

The aim of this article is to assess the consequences of the interpretation of the terms 'vehicle' and 'use of a vehicle' in the light of the case of Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Trigalev (C-162/13) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in accordance with the objectives set out in the Motor Insurance Directive.

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] The aim of this article is to assess the consequences of the interpretation of the terms 'vehicle' and 'use of a vehicle' in the light of the case ofDamijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Trigalev(C-162/13) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in accordance with the objectives set out in the Motor Insurance Directive. ; [straipsnis ir santrauka anglų kalba, santrauka lietuvių kalba] Šio straipsnio tikslas– įvertinti sąvokų "transporto priemonė" ir "transporto priemonės naudojimas" aiškinimo pasekmes, atsižvelgiant į Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo sprendimą bylojeDamijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Trigalev(C-162/13) ir Europos Sąjungos transporto priemonių draudimo direktyvoje siekiamus tikslus.

The aim of this article is to assess the consequences of the interpretation of the terms 'vehicle' and 'use of a vehicle' in the light of the case of Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Trigalev (C-162/13) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in accordance with the objectives set out in the Motor Insurance Directive.

The beginning of the 2020s ought to reflect a steady conclusion of the vast majority of the European Union's projects with regards to the new era of connectivity and mobility within the European Union dimension. We expect Intelligent Connected Vehicles (ICVs) to step into free circulation within the internal market. Since the operation of the ICVs depends on the number of data processing operations, data processing operations should be precisely determined and framed beforehand. ICVs data operations consist of extraordinarily large volumes and velocity of a data flow which previously existed in traditional relational database systems and could not have been processed within the desired timeframe. Even though the currently adopted database systems are ready to face the new level of data processing, a huge data stream is also faced with complex obstacles and new risks which have never been experienced beforehand. While seeking to ensure safe and secure introduction of a new level of data processing for connectivity and automation at the European Union market, the author precisely examines all potential risks and possibilities of integration into a uniform legal regulation to ensure secured ICVs data processing at all levels. The regulatory framework should document adequate security requirements and defences against ICVs attacks e.g. interference and remote-control interception.

In 21st century technological development never takes a break and progress itself is growing rapidly. The society reacts to the occurrence of new technologies, in particular while the usage of the above-stated technologies ends up in sharp conflicts. Regardless the type of technological product and the area where the latter is allocated, whenever the usage of new technologies produces a conflict it must be the case of a precise and qualitative legal regulation addressing the most accurate solution. In 2018, after the number of changes occurred within the motor insurance sector, European Commission admitted the necessary to include electrically power assisted cycles (EPACs) within the scope of the motor third party liability regulation. The regulation of ebikes in terms of the Motor Insurance Directive would be a wrong step at the European Union level due to the environmental, social, both human and financial resources reasons. At this stage, it is inevitably important to distinguish alternative transport, which must be accurately regulated at the European Union level from the one that shall remain untouched in terms of the legal intervention for the purposes of motor third party liability regulation. High technologies and technological progress are not always connected with inevitable necessity to provide with the legal regulation in particular field. Instead, both human and financial resources should be concentrated on the dimension of areas where conflicts are hardly or even impossible to be solved without imperative intervention of the qualitative legal regulation.

The aim of this article is to assess the consequences of the interpretation of the terms 'vehicle' and 'use of a vehicle' in the light of the case of Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Trigalev (C-162/13) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in accordance with the objectives set out in the Motor Insurance Directive.

In 21st century technological development never takes a break and progress itself is growing rapidly. The society reacts to the occurrence of new technologies, in particular while the usage of the above-stated technologies ends up in sharp conflicts. Regardless the type of technological product and the area where the latter is allocated, whenever the usage of new technologies produces a conflict it must be the case of a precise and qualitative legal regulation addressing the most accurate solution. In 2018, after the number of changes occurred within the motor insurance sector, European Commission admitted the necessary to include electrically power assisted cycles (EPACs) within the scope of the motor third party liability regulation. The regulation of ebikes in terms of the Motor Insurance Directive would be a wrong step at the European Union level due to the environmental, social, both human and financial resources reasons. At this stage, it is inevitably important to distinguish alternative transport, which must be accurately regulated at the European Union level from the one that shall remain untouched in terms of the legal intervention for the purposes of motor third party liability regulation. High technologies and technological progress are not always connected with inevitable necessity to provide with the legal regulation in particular field. Instead, both human and financial resources should be concentrated on the dimension of areas where conflicts are hardly or even impossible to be solved without imperative intervention of the qualitative legal regulation.

The aim of this article is to assess the consequences of the interpretation of the terms 'vehicle' and 'use of a vehicle' in the light of the case of Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Trigalev (C-162/13) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in accordance with the objectives set out in the Motor Insurance Directive.

In 21st century technological development never takes a break and progress itself is growing rapidly. The society reacts to the occurrence of new technologies, in particular while the usage of the above-stated technologies ends up in sharp conflicts. Regardless the type of technological product and the area where the latter is allocated, whenever the usage of new technologies produces a conflict it must be the case of a precise and qualitative legal regulation addressing the most accurate solution. In 2018, after the number of changes occurred within the motor insurance sector, European Commission admitted the necessary to include electrically power assisted cycles (EPACs) within the scope of the motor third party liability regulation. The regulation of ebikes in terms of the Motor Insurance Directive would be a wrong step at the European Union level due to the environmental, social, both human and financial resources reasons. At this stage, it is inevitably important to distinguish alternative transport, which must be accurately regulated at the European Union level from the one that shall remain untouched in terms of the legal intervention for the purposes of motor third party liability regulation. High technologies and technological progress are not always connected with inevitable necessity to provide with the legal regulation in particular field. Instead, both human and financial resources should be concentrated on the dimension of areas where conflicts are hardly or even impossible to be solved without imperative intervention of the qualitative legal regulation.

The beginning of the 2020s ought to reflect a steady conclusion of the vast majority of the European Union's projects with regards to the new era of connectivity and mobility within the European Union dimension. We expect Intelligent Connected Vehicles (ICVs) to step into free circulation within the internal market. Since the operation of the ICVs depends on the number of data processing operations, data processing operations should be precisely determined and framed beforehand. ICVs data operations consist of extraordinarily large volumes and velocity of a data flow which previously existed in traditional relational database systems and could not have been processed within the desired timeframe. Even though the currently adopted database systems are ready to face the new level of data processing, a huge data stream is also faced with complex obstacles and new risks which have never been experienced beforehand.While seeking to ensure safe and secure introduction of a new level of data processing for connectivity and automation at the European Union market, the author precisely examines all potential risks and possibilities of integration into a uniform legal regulation to ensure secured ICVs data processing at all levels. The regulatory framework should document adequate security requirements and defences against ICVs attacks e.g. interference and remote-control interception.

In 21st century technological development never takes a break and progress itself is growing rapidly. The society reacts to the occurrence of new technologies, in particular while the usage of the above-stated technologies ends up in sharp conflicts. Regardless the type of technological product and the area where the latter is allocated, whenever the usage of new technologies produces a conflict it must be the case of a precise and qualitative legal regulation addressing the most accurate solution. In 2018, after the number of changes occurred within the motor insurance sector, European Commission admitted the necessary to include electrically power assisted cycles (EPACs) within the scope of the motor third party liability regulation. The regulation of ebikes in terms of the Motor Insurance Directive would be a wrong step at the European Union level due to the environmental, social, both human and financial resources reasons. At this stage, it is inevitably important to distinguish alternative transport, which must be accurately regulated at the European Union level from the one that shall remain untouched in terms of the legal intervention for the purposes of motor third party liability regulation. High technologies and technological progress are not always connected with inevitable necessity to provide with the legal regulation in particular field. Instead, both human and financial resources should be concentrated on the dimension of areas where conflicts are hardly or even impossible to be solved without imperative intervention of the qualitative legal regulation.

The beginning of the 2020s ought to reflect a steady conclusion of the vast majority of the European Union's projects with regards to the new era of connectivity and mobility within the European Union dimension. We expect Intelligent Connected Vehicles (ICVs) to step into free circulation within the internal market. Since the operation of the ICVs depends on the number of data processing operations, data processing operations should be precisely determined and framed beforehand. ICVs data operations consist of extraordinarily large volumes and velocity of a data flow which previously existed in traditional relational database systems and could not have been processed within the desired timeframe. Even though the currently adopted database systems are ready to face the new level of data processing, a huge data stream is also faced with complex obstacles and new risks which have never been experienced beforehand. While seeking to ensure safe and secure introduction of a new level of data processing for connectivity and automation at the European Union market, the author precisely examines all potential risks and possibilities of integration into a uniform legal regulation to ensure secured ICVs data processing at all levels. The regulatory framework should document adequate security requirements and defences against ICVs attacks e.g. interference and remote-control interception.

The beginning of the 2020s ought to reflect a steady conclusion of the vast majority of the European Union's projects with regards to the new era of connectivity and mobility within the European Union dimension. We expect Intelligent Connected Vehicles (ICVs) to step into free circulation within the internal market. Since the operation of the ICVs depends on the number of data processing operations, data processing operations should be precisely determined and framed beforehand. ICVs data operations consist of extraordinarily large volumes and velocity of a data flow which previously existed in traditional relational database systems and could not have been processed within the desired timeframe. Even though the currently adopted database systems are ready to face the new level of data processing, a huge data stream is also faced with complex obstacles and new risks which have never been experienced beforehand. While seeking to ensure safe and secure introduction of a new level of data processing for connectivity and automation at the European Union market, the author precisely examines all potential risks and possibilities of integration into a uniform legal regulation to ensure secured ICVs data processing at all levels. The regulatory framework should document adequate security requirements and defences against ICVs attacks e.g. interference and remote-control interception.

"How does meaning get into the image? Where does it end?" asked Roland Barthes in his now-classic essay "Rhetoric of the image." At first glance, Barthes's questions might appear nonsensical, but as this discussion around the various uses and misuses of Evgenii Khaldei's photographs of war-time Budapest demonstrates, the question of meaning and truth in photography is anything but simple. This is because the meaning of a photograph is shaped by a multitude of factors, both internal and external to the image itself, and because the photographic medium, more so than other visual practices, lends itself to expectations of verisimilitude that obscure the complex relationship that photographs have to reality that they purportedly record.