Handbook on World Social Forum Activism
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 711-712
ISSN: 0035-2950
63 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Revue française de science politique, Band 62, Heft 4, S. 711-712
ISSN: 0035-2950
In: Sociologie du travail, Band 54, Heft 1, S. 138-139
ISSN: 1777-5701
In: Genèses: sciences sociales et histoire, Band 77, Heft 4, S. 137-151
ISSN: 1776-2944
Résumé Cet article s'attache à l'émergence du mouvement « Sauvons la recherche » à travers l'histoire du collectif, de la phase de mobilisation qui débute en janvier 2004 à son autodissolution en mars 2006. Écrit à la première personne – l'auteur ayant la particularité d'en avoir été acteur tout en étant sociologue des mouvements sociaux – il s'interroge sur le processus d'engagement et de désengagement, mais aussi, et plus profondément, sur le difficile équilibre de la position du chercheur et de la militante.
In: Twentieth century communism: a journal of international history, Heft 2, S. 66-91
ISSN: 1758-6437
In: Histoire_372Politique: politique, culture, société ; revue électronique du Centre d'Histoire de Sciences Po, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 7
ISSN: 1954-3670
In: Le mouvement social, Band 219-220, Heft 2, S. XIII-XIII
ISSN: 1961-8646
In: Sciences humaines: SH, Band 144, Heft 12, S. 22-22
In: Mouvements: des idées et des luttes, Band 27-28, Heft 3, S. 196
ISSN: 1776-2995
In: Mouvements: des idées et des luttes, Band 25, Heft 1, S. 108
ISSN: 1776-2995
In: International social science journal, Band 54, Heft 174, S. 473-481
ISSN: 1468-2451
This article defends the idea that terrorism, to which the term 'total violence' will be preferred, namely a deliberate strategy of blind violence against the civilian population accord‐ing to the principle of disjunction between victims ('non‐combatants', 'the innocent') and target (a government or other authority), is the civilian version of the extreme violence that is in most cases used by states. It identifies three processes that go to explain the emergence of this new form of violence. First, the historical process of the ideologisation and mythification of warfare, which permitted a substantial unleashing of state violence during the twentieth century and its civil society counterpart, arbi‐trary murder. Second, due prominence must be given in the analysis of violence to the purely technological factor, namely the new military and communication resources that hugely increase human capacity for destruction and its resultant terror effects. Lastly, there is an anthropological dimension, which, in the aggressor's relationship with the victim, places total violence in the category of extreme violence, as the conclusion of an a priori paradoxical linkage between the terrifying instrumentalisation of victims and the near mystical exaltation of their sacrifice.
In: International social science journal: ISSJ, Band 54, Heft 4 (174)
ISSN: 0020-8701
In: Revue internationale des sciences sociales, Band 174, Heft 4, S. 525
ISSN: 0304-3037
In: International social science journal: ISSJ, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 473-481
ISSN: 0020-8701
This article defends the idea that terrorism, to which the term "total violence" will be preferred, namely a deliberate strategy of blind violence against the civilian population according to the principle of disjunction between victims ("non-combatants," "the innocent") & target (a government or other authority), is the civilian version of the extreme violence that is in most cases used by states. It identifies three processes that go to explain the emergence of this new form of violence. First, the historical process of the ideologization & mythification of warfare, which permitted a substantial unleashing of state violence during the 20th century & its civil society counterpart, arbitrary murder. Second, due prominence must be given in the analysis of violence to the purely technological factor, namely the new military & communication resources that hugely increases the human capacity for destruction & its resultant terror effects. Lastly, there is an anthropological dimension, which, in the aggressor's relationship with the victim, places total violence in the category of extreme violence, as the conclusion of an a priori paradoxical linkage between the terrifying instrumentalization of victims & the near mystical exaltation of their sacrifice. 1 Photograph, 15 References. Adapted from the source document.
In: International social science journal: ISSJ, Band Dec
ISSN: 0020-8701
This article defends the idea that terrorism, to which the term 'total violence' will be preferred, namely a deliberate strategy of blind violence against the civilian population according to the principle of disjunction between victims ('non-combatants,' 'the innocent') and target (a government or other authority), is the civilian version of the extreme violence that is in most cases used by states. It identifies three processes that go to explain the emergence of this new form of violence. First, the historical process of the ideologization and mythification of warfare, which permitted a substantial unleashing of state violence during the 20th century and its civil society counterpart, arbitrary murder. Second, due prominence must be given in the analysis of violence to the purely technological factor, namely the new military and communication resources that hugely increases the human capacity for destruction and its resultant terror effects. Lastly, there is an anthropological dimension, which, in the aggressor's relationship with the victim, places total violence in the category of extreme violence, as the conclusion of an a priori paradoxical linkage between the terrifying instrumentalization of victims and the near mystical exaltation of their sacrifice. 1 Photograph, 15 References. (Original abstract - amended)
In: Cultures & conflits: sociologie politique de l'international, Heft 40
ISSN: 1777-5345