Suchergebnisse

The complexity of problems such as traditional local culture, low education factors and lack of community motivation are some of the problems that must be faced by the Serang City Government in implementing the BPNT program for KPM in Kasemen District, Serang City. The purpose of this study is to discuss the implementation of the BPNT program for KPM in Kasemen District, Serang City based on dynamic governance analysis. This study used a case study approach and informant retrieval was carried out by purposive sampling through interview and observation data collection techniques. The data were analyzed using the process of data classification, labeling and category arrangement based on research questions and interview transcripts for further data analysis. The results showed that the implementation of the BPNT program for KPM in Kasemen District, Serang City has not been fully implemented effectively and based on dynamic governance analysis, it is necessary to strengthen culture, capabilities and the three cognitive abilities as well as encourage effective government support, social capacity and public private partnerships. efforts to recommend policies in the BPNT program for KPM in Kasemen District, Serang CityKompleksitas permasalahan seperti budaya tradisional lokal, faktor pendidikan yang rendah dan kurangnya motivasi masyarakat menjadi beberapa permasalahan yang harus dihadapi oleh Pemerintah Kota Serang dalam melaksanakan program BPNT untuk KPM di Kecamatan Kasemen Kota Serang. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk membahas implementasi program BPNT untuk KPM di Kecamatan Kasemen Kota Serang berdasarkan analisis tata kelola dinamis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dan pengambilan informan dilakukan secara purposive sampling melalui teknik pengumpulan data wawancara dan observasi. Analisis data menggunakan proses klasifikasi data, pelabelan dan penyusunan kategori berdasarkan pertanyaan penelitian dan transkrip wawancara untuk analisis data selanjutnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ...

Dinamika kehidupan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia semakin berkembang seiring perkembangan tatanan kehidupan yang berdampak langsung terhadap hubungan antar masyarakat maupun hubungan masyarakat dengan pemerintahan. Indonesia merupakan negara hukum yang termanifestasikan kedalam konstitusi negara yang memberikan jaminan bagi masyarakat untuk turut serta menyelenggarakan tujuan-tujuan negara. Pasca runtuhnya rezim pemerintahan orde lama yang melahirkan reformasi birokrasi dan tatanan hukum pemerintahan. Momentum tersebut menjadi landasan terbentuknya berbagai gerakan sosial masyarakat dalam rangka menunjukan aspirasi dan kehendak masyarakat yang ditujukan baik antar masyarakat maupun terhadap pemerintahan. Perkembangan teknologi informasi serta adanya aras globalisasi yang tidak dapat dihindari, semakin mempercepat laju perubahan gerakan sosial yang sebelumnya hanya gerakan biasa, menjadi gerakan sosial yang terorganisir baik dibidang ekonomi, politik, sosial hingga agama. Lahirnya gerakan sosial merupakan dampak dari prinsip demokrasi yang memberikan ruang dan kesempatan bagi masyarakat untuk memperjuangkan hak-hak secara konstitusional. Perkembangan teknologi informasi terhadap gerakan sosial masyarakat perlu mendapatkan perhatian pemerintah, terlepas bahwa gerakan sosial merupakan bagian bagian prinsip demokrasi konstitusional. Gerakan sosial yang tidak diperhatikan oleh pemerintah di era globalisasi saat ini dikhawatirkan terpengaruh paham-paham radikalisme yang mengancam stabilitas pemerintahan. Gerakan sosial adalah hak setiap orang, dan mempertahankan serta menciptakan stabilitas negara adalah tanggungjawab pemerintah.

This Covid-19 began to infect almost all countries in early 2020, including in Indonesia, Covid-19 spread widely throughout the world and was declared as a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). In the current era of Big Data, large amounts of data have been generated and collected from a variety of rich data sources. Big Data is useful information and valuable knowledge. In this study, the method that will be used for data analysis is the K-Means algorithm with orange tools as a tool to display the results of data classification. One of the information that can be generated is Sentiment Analysis. The purpose of this research was to determining the information such as public sentiment on social media towards government policies in handling COVID-19. In this research, 2000 tweets were used. The keyword used related to government policies are sourced from several online media. The tools used to analyze this twitter data is using Orange Application. The selected keywords are covid19, lockdown, PSBB, and isolation. This keyword is used as a reference to retrieve tweet data from twitter. From each of these keywords, a sentiment classification process will be carried out automatically so that data or tweets are obtained and grouped into positive, negative and neutral sentiment classes. From the result of research conducted, public sentiment on social media towards government policies in handling this virus outbreak tends to be positive.

This article aims at discussing the New Public Management (NPM) approach that has been implemented in housing policies for low-income communities (MBR) in Indonesia and specifically describes how the NPM approach has diametrical relevance to the post-NPM approach. This research method uses a review approach. The data collection technique is through searching various sources and literature, both from NPM theories, regulations and historical documents on housing policy in Indonesia. Data analysis used in this study uses several stages, i.e., first a brief description of the history of Indonesia's housing policy during the Old Order, New Order s provided; the second stage focuses on the new order or reform era and explains how the housing approach for MBR in Indonesia has adopted the NPM policy, and the final section presents the direction of the housing policy reform in Indonesia based on the post-NPM paradigm. The result of the study indicates that the NPM approach in the context of housing policy for low-income communities (MBR) in Indonesia has not been fully able to overcome housing problems for low-income communities (MBR) and in principle the NPM approach requires socio-cultural, economic and political adaptation of Indonesia. The main point of this article is to encourage the realisation of an ideal housing policy for low-income communities (MBR) in the future through the application of a post-NPM approach as a correction and evaluation instrument while at the same time encouraging the housing policy reform for low-income communities (MBR) in Indonesia.

This article aims at discussing the New Public Management (NPM) approach that has been implemented in housing policies for low-income communities (MBR) in Indonesia and specifically describes how the NPM approach has diametrical relevance to the post-NPM approach. This research method uses a review approach. The data collection technique is through searching various sources and literature, both from NPM theories, regulations and historical documents on housing policy in Indonesia. Data analysis used in this study uses several stages, i.e., first a brief description of the history of Indonesia's housing policy during the Old Order, New Order s provided; the second stage focuses on the new order or reform era and explains how the housing approach for MBR in Indonesia has adopted the NPM policy, and the final section presents the direction of the housing policy reform in Indonesia based on the post-NPM paradigm. The result of the study indicates that the NPM approach in the context of housing policy for low-income communities (MBR) in Indonesia has not been fully able to overcome housing problems for low-income communities (MBR) and in principle the NPM approach requires socio-cultural, economic and political adaptation of Indonesia. The main point of this article is to encourage the realisation of an ideal housing policy for low-income communities (MBR) in the future through the application of a post-NPM approach as a correction and evaluation instrument while at the same time encouraging the housing policy reform for low-income communities (MBR) in Indonesia.

Integrated approaches to natural resource management are often undermined by fundamental governance weaknesses. We studied governance of a forest landscape in East Lombok, Indonesia. Forest Management Units (Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan or KPH) are an institutional mechanism used in Indonesia for coordinating the management of competing sectors in forest landscapes, balancing the interests of government, business, and civil society. Previous reviews of KPHs indicate they are not delivering their potential benefits due to an uncertain legal mandate and inadequate resources. We utilized participatory methods with a broad range of stakeholders in East Lombok to examine how KPHs might improve institutional arrangements to better meet forest landscape goals. We find that KPHs are primarily limited by insufficient integration with other actors in the landscape. Thus, strengthened engagement with other institutions, as well as civil society, is required. Although new governance arrangements that allow for institutional collaboration and community engagement are needed in the long term, there are steps that the East Lombok KPH can take now. Coordinating institutional commitments and engaging civil society to reconcile power asymmetries and build consensus can help promote sustainable outcomes. Our study concludes that improved multi-level, polycentric governance arrangements between government, NGOs, the private sector, and civil society are required to achieve sustainable landscapes in Lombok. The lessons from Lombok can inform forest landscape governance improvements throughout Indonesia and the tropics. ; Forestry, Faculty of ; Non UBC ; Forest and Conservation Sciences, Department of ; Reviewed ; Faculty

Integrated approaches to natural resource management are often undermined by fundamental governance weaknesses. We studied governance of a forest landscape in East Lombok, Indonesia. Forest Management Units (Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan or KPH) are an institutional mechanism used in Indonesia for coordinating the management of competing sectors in forest landscapes, balancing the interests of government, business, and civil society. Previous reviews of KPHs indicate they are not delivering their potential benefits due to an uncertain legal mandate and inadequate resources. We utilized participatory methods with a broad range of stakeholders in East Lombok to examine how KPHs might improve institutional arrangements to better meet forest landscape goals. We find that KPHs are primarily limited by insufficient integration with other actors in the landscape. Thus, strengthened engagement with other institutions, as well as civil society,is required. Although new governance arrangements that allow for institutional collaboration and community engagement are needed in the long term, there are steps that the East Lombok KPH can take now. Coordinating institutional commitments and engaging civil society to reconcile power asymmetries and build consensus can help promote sustainable outcomes. Our study concludes that improved multi-level, polycentric governance arrangements between government, NGOs, the private sector, and civil society are required to achieve sustainable landscapes in Lombok. The lessons from Lombok can inform forest landscape governance improvements throughout Indonesia and the tropics.

In the era of digitalization of education and economy and the development of artificial intelligence, adolescents appear highly competitive compared with other generations in understanding digital technologies, acquiring expertise, and mastering modern means of communication, which normally causes intergenerational conflicts and the loss of an adult's personal and functional authority. The aim of this research was to develop and test a model for developing adolescents' communicative cultures in an institution of additional education. The research emphasizes the significance of personality-oriented, interactive-communicative, and cultural approaches and conducts a comparative analysis of the sources. Methodologically, the study relies on a quantitative method with primary sources. Besides, the findings of the study contribute to the existing limited stress on the importance of adolescents' communicative cultures from the perspective of the digitalization of additional education. The study finds that the use of digital options in education has reduced social interaction among students. However, the students prefer to use digital methods of learning as they find them more convenient for communication. Therefore, the digital communication culture has high potential in the educational sector. The findings are novel as this study is one of the few recent studies that examined how communicative culture has transformed due to digital means in education. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-SIED-019 Full Text: PDF